Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an updated meta-analysis.

Background: The use of cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) reveals conflicting data. Aims: This updated meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System. Methods: A literature search for relevant studies up to September 2022 was performed. Study outcomes were divided based on time period - overall (up to 30 days) and short (≤7 days). The outcomes studied include stroke (disabling, non-disabling), mortality, neuroimaging findings, transient ischaemic attack, acute kidney injury and major vascular and bleeding complications. Results: A total of 15 studies involving 294,134 patients were included. Regarding overall outcomes, significant reductions were noted for mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.88; p=0.008), all stroke (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88; p=0.006) and disabling stroke (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.74; p=0.003) using the SENTINEL device. No significant differences were noted for other outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity across the studies for mortality (p=0.013) and all stroke (p=0.003). Including only randomised data (n=4), there was only significant reduction in the incidence of disabling stroke (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17-0.89; p=0.026) in the SENTINEL group. In studies reporting ≤7-day outcomes (n=8), use of the SENTINEL device demonstrated significantly lower rates of all stroke (p<0.001), disabling stroke (p<0.001) and major bleeding complications (p=0.02). No differences in neuroimaging outcomes were noted. Conclusions: In this updated meta-analysis, use of the SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System was associated with lower rates of mortality, all stroke and disabling stroke, although significant heterogeneity was noted for mortality and all stroke. Including exclusively randomised data, there was only significant reduction in the incidence of disabling stroke. No significant adverse outcomes with device use were noted.

Impact of aortic annular size and valve type on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Data on patients with small aortic annuli (SAA) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are limited. We aim to describe the impact of aortic annular size, particularly SAA and TAVI valve type on valve haemodynamics, durability and clinical outcomes. METHOD: All patients in National Heart Centre Singapore who underwent transfemoral TAVI for severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis from July 2012 to December 2019 were included. Outcome measures include valve haemodynamics, prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), structural valve degeneration (SVD) and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.22±6.08, with 52.5% patients with small aortic annulus (<23mm), 33.2% patients with medium aortic annulus (23-26mm) and 14.3% patients with large aortic annulus (>26mm). There were more patients with self-expanding valve (SEV) (65.2%) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) (34.8%). There were no significant differences in indexed aortic valve area (iAVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), PPM, SVD or mortality across all aortic annular sizes. However, specific to the SAA group, patients with SEV had larger iAVA (SEV 1.19±0.35cm2/m2 vs BEV 0.88±0.15cm2/m2, P<0.01) and lower MPG (SEV 9.25±4.88 mmHg vs BEV 14.17±4.75 mmHg, P<0.01) at 1 year, without differences in PPM or mortality. Aortic annular size, TAVI valve type and PPM did not predict overall mortality up to 7 years. There was no significant difference in SVD between aortic annular sizes up to 5 years. CONCLUSION: Valve haemodynamics and durability were similar across the different aortic annular sizes. In the SAA group, SEV had better haemodynamics than BEV at 1 year, but no differences in PPM or mortality. There were no significant differences in mortality between aortic annular sizes, TAVI valve types or PPM.

Type 2 Endoleaks: Common and Hard to Eradicate yet Benign?

PURPOSE: The exact significance of type 2 endoleaks (T2ELs) and the indication and efficacy of treatment are widely debated. We report our experience with managing T2ELs in a tertiary Asian centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) between February 2006 and December 2016. Patients with T2ELs were identified, and their data were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients underwent EVAR, of which 67 (42.9%) developed T2ELs. Seven were lost to follow-up. The remaining 60 patients had a mean follow-up period of 50.3 ± 33.9 months-34 (56.7%) experienced T2ELs early and the rest (43.3%) had late T2ELs. Forty-one patients had isolated T2EL, whilst 19 had concomitant T1EL and/or T3EL. Spontaneous resolution occurred in 25 patients (41.7%). All T2ELs with stable sac size were on continued surveillance. Amongst those with persistent T2ELs associated with sac growth (n = 17), 14 underwent intervention, of which 7 (50%) received > 1 embolisation procedure. A total of 16 transarterial embolisation and 8 translumbar embolisation procedures were performed. Technical success rate was 75%. In the intervention group, 5 (35.7%) had complete and sustained resolution, 7 had persistent/recurrent T2ELs but stable sac size, and 2 had progressive sac expansion. Overall mortality due to sac rupture occurred in 2 patients with concomitant T2EL and T1EL/T3EL. CONCLUSION: T2ELs are common, albeit mostly benign if occurring in isolation and not in association with sac growth. Achieving complete T2EL resolution with embolisation is difficult even with reinterventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2B, retrospective study.

Prognostic Factors for Survival After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock.

The aim of this study is to examine factors that can predict mortality in patients that have veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) instituted for cardiogenic shock. A single-center, retrospective study of 127 patients who underwent VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock between January 2003 and December 2017 was conducted. Eighty-three (65%) patients survived to weaning or bridging therapy. Complications on VA-ECMO include: hemorrhage (40%), stroke (14%), requirement for dialysis (42%), and limb ischemia (24%). Univariate analysis revealed shorter ECMO duration, higher body mass index, preimplantation creatinine > 100 mmol/l, lower preimplantation serum albumin, and the development of stroke or limb ischemia on ECMO to be significantly associated with mortality while on ECMO. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression found shorter ECMO duration and lower preimplantation serum albumin to be significantly associated with mortality. VA-ECMO is an effective strategy in treating patients with cardiogenic shock and provides a reasonable chance of survival to weaning or bridging to other therapy. Preimplantation hypoalbuminemia, preimplantation serum creatinine > 100 mmol/l, and the development of stroke and limb ischemia while on VA-ECMO are strongly associated with mortality.

Staphylococcal driveline infections are the predominant type of left ventricular assist device associated infections in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) associated infections (LVADIs) have substantial morbidity and mortality. We aim to describe the incidence and epidemiology of LVADIs in an Asian cohort. This is currently not well studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 52 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1 May 2009-31 December 2014 in National Heart Centre Singapore. LVADIs were defined based on definitions proposed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. RESULTS: There were 39 males and 13 females. Seventy-three percent had Heartmate II LVAD implant while 27% received Heartware HVAD. Eighty-one percent were implanted as bridge to heart transplantation, 19% as destination therapy. Forty-five episodes of LVADIs occurred in 25 patients. Overall LVADI incidence was 47.5 cases per 100 patient-years. Driveline infections (58%) were the commonest type of LVADI. The commonest causative organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (33%), Staphylococcus aureus (31%) and Corynebacterium species (19%). Twelve percent of patients with LVADI required surgical debridement and one patient required pump exchange due to pump pocket infection. All-cause mortality was 13%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study add to the understanding and epidemiology of LVADIs, particularly in the Asian setting. This can contribute to the development of evidence based strategies to prevent and manage LVADIs.

Left Circumflex Artery Rupture with Left Atrial Tamponade and Functional Mitral Stenosis.

The growth in percutaneous transluminal devices has enabled operators to tackle more complex, native, and post-bypass surgery anatomy. However, complications such as coronary artery dissection, coronary perforation, retrograde aortic dissection, arrhythmias, and acute coronary syndrome still occur with resulting mortality rates of up to 4.2% in complex interventions. Perforation of the circumflex artery is of particular interest in view of its position and relation to the surrounding cardiac structures. This is a site of potential fluid collection, and as the left atrium is fixed to the parietal pericardium at the entry of the pulmonary veins, fluid in the oblique sinus can accumulate enough pressure to compress the left atrium and the coronary sinus. We present a case of left circumflex artery perforation which demonstrates the physiologic complications of coronary sinus and left atrial compression and the resultant functional mitral stenosis.