Retrospective Review of Intrathecal Hydromorphone Dose Range and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Optimal intrathecal dosing regimens for hydromorphone are not well established for analgesia after abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVES: We reviewed intrathecal hydromorphone doses and complications because dosing variability has been observed among anesthesiologists. We hypothesized that increasing doses of intrathecal hydromorphone would be associated with improved postoperative analgesia, but with increased rates of opioid-related adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A high-volume academic referral center in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of adults undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia supplemented preoperatively with intrathecal hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia from May 5, 2018, through May 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into 3 hydromorphone dosing groups: low-dose (50-100 µg), middle-dose (101-199 µg), and high-dose (200-300 µg). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess rates of severe postoperative pain, severe opioid-related adverse events, oversedation, and pruritus in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and within 24 hours after PACU discharge. RESULTS: Of 1,846 patients identified, 1,235 (66.9%) were in the low-dose group; 321 (17.3%), middle-dose group; and 290 (15.7%), high-dose group. Patients receiving the 2 higher doses had more extensive procedures. An unadjusted analysis showed differing rates of severe pain in the PACU by group: 306 (24.8%) in the low-dose, 73 (22.7%) middle-dose, and 45 (15.5%) in the high-dose group (P = 0.003); these differences, however, were no longer significant after an adjusted analysis (P = 0.34). Ten severe opioid-related events occurred; all were recognized in the PACU. Five events each occurred in the low-dose and high-dose groups versus none in the middle-dose group (P = 0.02). No other differences were identified with adjusted analyses. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of our study include its retrospective design and its conduct at a single center, along with the apparent, but difficult to characterize, treatment biases in hydromorphone dosing. CONCLUSIONS: No dose response was observed between intrathecal hydromorphone dose and postoperative analgesia, a finding that may reflect treatment bias. Higher rates of severe opioid-related events were detected for patients receiving high-dose hydromorphone in the PACU, but all other safety outcomes were similar between dosing regimens. KEY WORDS: Drug-related side effects, opioid analgesics, outcome assessment, postoperative pain, spinal injections.

Practical Anemia Bundle for Sustained Blood Recovery (PABST-BR) in critical illness: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is highly prevalent in critical illness and is associated with impaired outcomes during and after hospitalisation. However, the impact of interventions designed to attenuate or treat anaemia during critical illness on post-hospitalisation haemoglobin recovery and functional outcomes is unclear. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Practical Anemia Bundle for Sustained Blood Recovery (PABST-BR) clinical trial is a pragmatic, open-label, parallel group, single-centre, randomised clinical trial assessing the impact of a multifaceted anaemia prevention and treatment strategy versus standard care for improvement of haemoglobin concentrations and functional outcomes after critical illness. The intervention, which will be delivered early in critical illness for those with moderate-to-severe anaemia (ie, haemoglobin <100 g/L), includes three components: (1) optimised phlebotomy, (2) clinical decision support and (3) pharmacological anaemia treatment directed at the underlying aetiology of anaemia. In-person assessments will occur at 1 and 3 months post-hospitalisation for laboratory evaluations and multidimensional functional outcome assessments. The primary outcome is differences in haemoglobin concentrations between groups, with secondary endpoints of anaemia-related fatigue, physical function, cognition, mental health, quality of life, phlebotomy volumes and frequency, transfusions, readmissions and mortality through 1-year post-hospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, USA. A Data Safety Monitoring Plan has been created in accordance with the policies of the Institutional Review Board and the study funder, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The study will comply with NIH data sharing and dissemination policies. Results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Designing and testing strategies to optimise haemoglobin recovery and improve functional outcomes after critical illness remain important research gaps. The PABST-BR trial will inform the development of a larger multicentre clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05167734.

Apneic Technique in Laryngotracheal Surgery.

Background Apneic oxygenation can be applied to select laryngotracheal procedures to improve operative visualization and avoid potential complications associated with intubation and jet ventilation.  Aims/objectives The authors sought to determine if apneic oxygenation using a high-flow nasal cannula could be used as a safe alternative airway management strategy for the duration of select laryngotracheal procedures. Methods Single institution, multi-site retrospective review of 38 adult (>18 years old) patients undergoing apneic oxygenation in the setting of various laryngotracheal procedures from January 2017 through January 2018. Humidified oxygen was delivered via a high-flow nasal cannula. The data was collected and analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results Twenty-four women and 14 men, mean age 60.0 years (SD 16.1; 36-89) and 70.1 years (SD 7.2; 56-81), respectively, underwent a mean total apneic time of 23.9 minutes (13-40). A statistically significant correlation existed between apneic time and minimum oxygen saturation (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.38; p=0.018). Twenty-one patients resumed spontaneous ventilation without the need for jet ventilation, mask ventilation, or placement of a definitive airway during the procedure.  Conclusions and significance Apneic oxygenation allows for extended periods of operating without the need for the placement of an endotracheal tube in patients undergoing general anesthesia for select laryngotracheal procedures.

Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Recommendations From an Expert Panel.

Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has emerged as a powerful tool to help anesthesiologists guide patient care in both the perioperative setting and the subspecialty arenas. Although anesthesiologists can turn to guideline statements pertaining to other aspects of ultrasound use, to date there remains little in the way of published guidance regarding diagnostic PoCUS. To this end, in 2018, the American Society of Anesthesiologists chartered an ad hoc committee consisting of 23 American Society of Anesthesiologists members to provide recommendations on this topic. The ad hoc committee convened and developed a committee work product. This work product was updated in 2021 by an expert panel of the ad hoc committee to produce the document presented herein. The document, which represents the consensus opinion of a group of practicing anesthesiologists with established expertise in diagnostic ultrasound, addresses the following issues: (1) affirms the practice of diagnostic PoCUS by adequately trained anesthesiologists, (2) identifies the scope of practice of diagnostic PoCUS relevant to anesthesiologists, (3) suggests the minimum level of training needed to achieve competence, (4) provides recommendations for how diagnostic PoCUS can be used safely and ethically, and (5) provides broad guidance about diagnostic ultrasound billing.

Changing Resident Physician Studying Behaviors: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Goal Setting Versus Use of WOOP.

BACKGROUND: Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying. METHODS: Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.

Changing Physician Behavior With Implementation Intentions: Closing the Gap Between Intentions and Actions.

In medical education, even well-intentioned learners struggle to change their practice. This intention-action gap is a well-described phenomenon. Strong commitment to changing behaviors is important, but by itself it is only a modest predictor of goal attainment.Implementation intentions are an extensively studied strategy from cognitive psychology that have been shown to close the intention-action gap and increase goal attainment across myriad domains. Implementation intentions are "if-then" plans that specify an anticipated future situation and a planned response-"If I encounter situation X, then I will respond with action Y." They differ from simple goals, which specify only a desired behavior or outcome-"I intend to perform action Z." Despite this subtle difference, they have shown substantial effectiveness over goals alone in increasing goal attainment.In this article, the authors first describe implementation intentions, review the substantial body of evidence demonstrating their effectiveness, and explain the underlying psychological mechanisms. They then illustrate the connections between implementation intentions and established learning theory. The final section focuses on forming effective implementation intentions in medical education. The authors provide concrete examples across the continuum of learners (from medical students to attending physicians) and competencies, and make recommendations for when and how to employ implementation intentions.

Serotonin Syndrome: The Potential for a Severe Reaction Between Common Perioperative Medications and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed to patients of all ages. Although generally considered safe, therapy with SSRIs can be complicated by serotonin syndrome (SS), a life-threatening condition. We present a case of SS that developed in a young man who was receiving a stable dose of fluoxetine and then received several commonly used medications during an emergent appendectomy. Because polypharmacy in the perioperative setting may trigger SS, it is important for anesthesiologists to be cognizant of the interactions between SSRIs and common perioperative medications to formulate anesthetic plans that optimize patient safety.

Resident characterization of better-than- and worse-than-average clinical teaching.

BACKGROUND: Clinical teachers and trainees share a common view of what constitutes excellent clinical teaching, but associations between these behaviors and high teaching scores have not been established. This study used residents' written feedback to their clinical teachers, to identify themes associated with above- or below-average teaching scores. METHODS: All resident evaluations of their clinical supervisors in a single department were collected from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2008. A mean teaching score assigned by each resident was calculated. Evaluations that were 20% higher or 15% lower than the resident's mean score were used. A subset of these evaluations was reviewed, generating a list of 28 themes for further study. Two researchers then, independently coded the presence or absence of these themes in each evaluation. Interrater reliability of the themes and logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictive associations of the themes with above- or below-average evaluations. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-seven above-average and 285 below-average evaluations were evaluated for the presence or absence of 15 positive themes and 13 negative themes, which were divided into four categories: teaching, supervision, interpersonal, and feedback. Thirteen of 15 positive themes correlated with above-average evaluations and nine had high interrater reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient >0.6). Twelve of 13 negative themes correlated with below-average evaluations, and all had high interrater reliability. On the basis of these findings, the authors developed 13 recommendations for clinical educators. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed 13 recommendations for clinical teachers using the themes identified from the above- and below-average clinical teaching evaluations submitted by anesthesia residents.

Identifying meaningful outcome measures for the intensive care unit.

Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.

Decision support using anesthesia information management system records and accreditation council for graduate medical education case logs for resident operating room assignments.

Our goal in this study was to develop decision support systems for resident operating room (OR) assignments using anesthesia information management system (AIMS) records and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs and evaluate the implementations. We developed 2 Web-based systems: an ACGME case-log visualization tool, and Residents Helping in Navigating OR Scheduling (Rhinos), an interactive system that solicits OR assignment requests from residents and creates resident profiles. Resident profiles are snapshots of the cases and procedures each resident has done and were derived from AIMS records and ACGME case logs. A Rhinos pilot was performed for 6 weeks on 2 clinical services. One hundred sixty-five requests were entered and used in OR assignment decisions by a single attending anesthesiologist. Each request consisted of a rank ordered list of up to 3 ORs. Residents had access to detailed information about these cases including surgeon and patient name, age, procedure type, and admission status. Success rates at matching resident requests were determined by comparing requests with AIMS records. Of the 165 requests, 87 first-choice matches (52.7%), 27 second-choice matches (16.4%), and 8 third-choice matches (4.8%) were made. Forty-three requests were unmatched (26.1%). Thirty-nine first-choice requests overlapped (23.6%). Full implementation followed on 8 clinical services for 8 weeks. Seven hundred fifty-four requests were reviewed by 15 attending anesthesiologists, with 339 first-choice matches (45.0%), 122 second-choice matches (16.2%), 55 third-choice matches (7.3%), and 238 unmatched (31.5%). There were 279 overlapping first-choice requests (37.0%). The overall combined match success rate was 69.4%. Separately, we developed an ACGME case-log visualization tool that allows individual resident experiences to be compared against case minimums as well as resident peer groups. We conclude that it is feasible to use ACGME case-log data in decision support systems for informing resident OR assignments. Additional analysis will be necessary to assess the educational impact of these systems.