RESUMEN
Background: Advanced MRI-based neuroimaging techniques, such as perfusion and spectroscopy, have been increasingly incorporated into routine follow-up protocols in patients treated for high-grade glioma (HGG), to help differentiate tumor progression from treatment effect. However, these techniques' influence on clinical management remains poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the impact of MRI-based advanced neuroimaging on clinical decision-making in patients with HGG in the posttreatment setting. Methods: This prospective study, performed at a comprehensive cancer center from March 1, 2017, to October 31, 2020, included adult patients treated by chemoradiation for WHO grade 4 diffuse glioma who underwent MRIbased advanced neuroimaging (comprising multiple perfusion imaging sequences and spectroscopy) to further evaluate findings on conventional MRI equivocal for tumor progression versus treatment effect. The ordering neuro-oncologists completed surveys before and after each advanced neuroimaging session. The percent of care episodes with a change between the intended and actual management plan on the surveys conducted before and after advanced neuroimaging, respectively, was computed and compared with a previously published percent using the Wald test for independent samples proportions. Results: The study included 63 patients (mean age, 55±13 years; 36 women, 27 men) who underwent 70 advanced neuroimaging sessions. Ordering neuro-oncologists' intended and actual management plans on the surveys completed before and after advanced neuroimaging, respectively, differed in 44% (31/70, [95% CI: 33-56%]) of episodes, which differed from the previously published frequency of 8.5% (5/59) (p<.001). These management plan changes included selection of a different plan for 6/8 episodes with an intended plan to enroll patients in a clinical trial, 12/19 episodes with an intended plan to change chemotherapeutic agents, 4/8 episodes with an intended plan of surgical intervention, and 1/2 episodes with an intended plan of re-irradiation. The ordering neuro-oncologists found advanced neuroimaging to be helpful in 93% (95% CI: 87%-99%) (65/70) of episodes. Conclusion: Neuro-oncologists' management plans changed in a substantial fraction of adult patients with HGG who underwent advanced neuroimaging to further evaluate conventional MRI findings equivocal for tumor progression versus treatment effect. Clinical Impact: The findings support incorporation of advanced neuroimaging into HGG posttreatment monitoring protocols.
RESUMEN
Background: The aim of this study was to describe the oncologic outcomes of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) who had neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy with subsequent surgery. For context, we also reviewed patients who received BRAF-directed therapy after surgery, and those who did not have surgery after BRAF-directed therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care cancer center in Texas from 2017 to 2021. Fifty-seven consecutive patients with BRAFV600E-mutated ATC and at least 1 month of BRAF-directed therapy were included. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All patients had stage IVB (35%) or IVC (65%) ATC. Approximately 70% of patients treated with BRAF-directed therapy ultimately had surgical resection of residual disease. Patients who had neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy followed by surgery (n = 32) had 12-month OS of 93.6% [confidence interval (CI) 84.9-100] and PFS of 84.4% [CI 71.8-96.7]. Patients who had surgery before BRAF-directed therapy (n = 12) had 12-month OS of 74.1% [CI 48.7-99.5] and PFS of 50% [CI 21.7-78.3]. Finally, patients who did not receive surgery after BRAF-directed therapy (n = 13) had 12-month OS of 38.5% [CI 12.1-64.9] and PFS of 15.4% [CI 0-35.0]. Neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy reduced tumor size, extent of surgery, and surgical morbidity score. Subgroup analysis suggested that any residual ATC in the surgical specimen was associated with significantly worse 12-month OS and PFS (OS = 83.3% [CI 62.6-100], PFS = 61.5% [CI 35.1-88]) compared with patients with pathologic ATC complete response (OS = 100%, PFS = 100%). Conclusions: We observed that neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy reduced extent of surgery and surgical morbidity. While acknowledging potential selection bias, the 12-month OS rate appeared higher in patients who had BRAF-directed therapy followed by surgery as compared with BRAF-directed therapy without surgery; yet, it was not significantly different from surgery followed by BRAF-directed therapy. PFS appeared higher in patients treated with neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy relative to patients in the other groups. These promising results of neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy followed by surgery for BRAF-mutated ATC should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.