Effects of environmental cleaning bundles on reducing healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Environmental contamination with Clostridioides difficile plays an important role in the transmission of C. difficile infection (CDI) in healthcare and long-term care facilities, which results in prolonged length of stay, higher risk of mortality and increased healthcare costs. Environmental cleaning bundles are introduced to improve environmental cleanliness. This study aimed to evaluate whether environmental cleaning bundles applied in hospital, community and long-term care settings reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated CDI compared with conventional cleaning practices. Relevant databases, websites and trial registration platforms were searched. Two reviewers conducted study screening and selection, data collection, risk of bias assessment and evidence quality assessment independently. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3. Ten eligible studies [one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and nine non-RCTs] were included. No significant effect of environmental cleaning bundles on the CDI incidence rate was found [risk ratio (RR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.29; studies=2; I2=49%; very low quality]. However, the removal of surface markers was improved significantly (RR=1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.84; studies=3; I2=98%; very low quality), and the percentage of CDI rooms with positive cultures of C. difficile (RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.31; studies=4; I2=7%; moderate quality) was reduced significantly after the implementation of environmental cleaning bundles. Environmental cleaning bundles may consequently be helpful in improving the thoroughness of cleaning of environmental surfaces in hospital and long-term care settings. More well-conducted RCTs are expected to provide stronger evidence.

Feasibility of a guided participation discharge program for very preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that parents of very preterm infants expressed feelings of incompetence and experienced high levels of stress upon the discharge of their infants. We conducted a systematic review of seven studies and observed potential benefits for parental outcomes when using discharge interventions that adopted guided participation (GP). More evidence is needed on the effective doses of discharge interventions underpinned by the principles of GP. AIM: To investigate the feasibility and preliminarily estimate the effects on parental competence and stress outcomes of a newly developed, nurse-led, GP discharge program for mothers of very preterm infants. METHODS: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Mothers of infants with gestational ages of ≤32 weeks who had no congenital malformations and did not need to undergo major surgeries were recruited. All mothers were the primary caregivers to their infants. The intervention group received a nurse-led GP discharge intervention (three structured 30- to 60-min GP sessions and one follow-up phone call). The control group received usual care. The parental outcomes were measured using the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (C-PSOC) and Perceived Stress Scale (C-PSS) at baseline (T0), on the day of discharge (T1), after the follow-up phone call (within 72 h after discharge) (T2), and 1 month after discharge (T3). The outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations based on intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: Thirty infant-mother dyads were recruited. Greater improvements in the C-PSOC score were observed in the intervention group than in the control group at T1 and T2, although these differences were statistically insignificant. The intervention group exhibited greater improvements than the control group in the C-PSS scores at T1, T2, and T3, although these differences were also not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a GP discharge intervention could improve parenting competence and stress among mothers with very preterm infants. The absence of adverse events suggests that the GP discharge intervention could be feasibly implemented in NICU settings. This feasibility study was not powered to determine the effectiveness of the intervention but is anticipated to lay the foundation for a future full-scale study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03668912. Date of registration: 13 September 2018 (retrospectively registered).

Assessment of adherence to eczema treatment in Hong Kong children.

Introduction: Eczema is the most common childhood skin problem in Hong Kong. Treatment adherence is crucial in symptom management and the effectiveness of eczema management. The Problematic Experiences of Therapy Scale (PETS) is used to assess adherence to treatment among children with eczema. Objective: This study examined the psychometric properties of the translated Chinese version of PETS (C-PETS) among parents and caregivers of children with eczema. Methods: PETS was translated into Chinese and data obtained from a convenience sample of 147 Chinese participants from a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Results: The internal consistency of C-PETS with a Cronbach's α of 0.93 and good test-retest reliability with weighted Kappa ranging from 0.74 to 0.89 were obtained. Significant positive correlations were found among the C-PETS, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (r = 0.25, p = .002), and Severity Grading of Atopic Dermatitis scores (r = 0.38, p = .001). A significant negative correlation was found between C-PETS and Chinese adaptation of Generic Self-Efficacy scale (r = -0.40, p = .001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data supported the structural validity of C-PETS. Conclusion: This study indicates that C-PETS is a reliable and valid measure to evaluate treatment adherence for Chinese parents and caregivers of children with eczema.

Infection control practices among hospital health and support workers in Hong Kong.

A report by the Hong Kong government noted that hospital infection control standards were inadequate, requiring audit, development and implementation. In addition, hospital staff needed training in infection control measures. We investigated infection control practices among 162 hospital health workers (109 nurses, 45 doctors and 8 therapists) and 44 support workers in one acute hospital and two rehabilitation hospitals using a non-blinded, observational design. We examined compliance with isolation precautions and infection control guidelines, including proper wearing of a mask, goggles/face shield, or gown; handling patient care equipment, linen, and laundry; routine and terminal cleaning; and terminal cleaning of an isolation room. One major breakdown in compliance was use of sleeveless disposable plastic aprons instead of long-sleeved gowns during procedures likely to generate splashes or sprays of blood and body fluids. In more than half of the observed episodes, participants failed to disinfect medical devices, such as stethoscopes, before re-use. Thorough cleansing of commodes between patients was also lacking. Overall compliance with local and international infection control guidelines was satisfactory, but several aspects required improvement.

An evaluation of SARS and droplet infection control practices in acute and rehabilitation hospitals in Hong Kong.

1. This study has demonstrated that great efforts have been made by the Hospital Authority and the studied hospital cluster to contain and prevent infection, and that high levels of vigilance have been enforced in anticipation of future outbreaks of SARS and other droplet infections. 2. Most health care workers and support workers have good hospital infection control and isolation precaution knowledge levels. 3. Compliance with infection control guidelines is satisfactory and has increased compared with previous studies. 4. Most participants had positive perceptions of the guidelines and found the training programmes useful. 5. This study has identified several structures and infection control practice areas that need strengthening, including improving the clarity of some guidelines and minimising barriers to their implementation.