RESUMEN
Endodontist should know about the fracture resistance of endodontic treated teeth in different obturation techniques to make a proper choice for obturation of mechano-chemically prepared root canals. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically obturated teeth in five different obturation techniques namely single cone obturation (SCO), cold lateral compaction (CLC), cold free flow condensation, warm vertical compaction, injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Among experimental categories, maximum fracture resistance was observed in cold free flow condensation technique while minimum fracture resistance was observed in injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Cold free flow condensation technique using Gutta Flow2 has the potential to be used as obturation technique with minimum fracture resistance. Conventional techniques like CLC and SOC also offered good fracture resistance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, concerns have arisen regarding the sealing efficacy of traditional root canal obturation materials such as gutta-percha (GP) and various sealers. The resin-based obturation complexes like RealSealTM (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) and ResilonTM (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, CT) had been developed as replacements for conventional obturation materials, gutta-percha, and various types of sealers. Additionally, ActiV GPTM (Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA), a glass-ionomer-based obturation system, has gained attention. AIM: This in vitro study's objective was to evaluate ActiV GPTM/GI (glass ionomer) sealer's sealing capacity and compare it to that of ResilonTM/RealSeal TM as well as gutta-percha/AH PlusTM (Dentsply International Inc, York, PA) taken as a control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this in vitro investigation, 90 freshly excised single-rooted human premolars of the mandible were chosen. According to the substance used to seal the root canals, the teeth were randomly separated into three separate groups (n=30). Group 1: The ActiV GPTM obturation system was used to seal and obturate the canals. Group 2: ResilonTM/RealSealTM was used to obturate and block the canals. Group 3: GP points and AH PlusTM were used to seal the canals employing the lateral condensation methodology. All of the root surfaces-aside from the last 2 mm of the root-were painted with two coats of nail polish before being submerged in 2% methylene blue for a duration of 24 hours at a temperature of 37°C. The highest amount of dye leakage was determined using a stereomicroscope at 20X magnification. RESULTS: The extent of dye penetration at the apical region in specimens of the ActiV GPTM category was 4.93±1.48 mm. The depth of dye penetration at the apical region in specimens of the ResilonTM category was 2.78 ±1.62 mm. The extension of penetration of dye was 0.48± 0.46 mm in specimens of the GP/AH PlusTM category. The degree of microlikeage was maximum in ActiV GPTM specimens and it was minimum in GP/AH PlusTM specimens. The microlikeage in specimens of the Resilon category was greater than GP/AH plusTM while it was lower than ActiV GPTM specimens. The observations were statistically meaningful (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the dye penetration examination, it can be concluded that the root canal wall sealing capabilities of ActiV GPTM with GI Sealer were inferior to those of GP/AH PlusTM and ResilonTM with RealSealTM.