Using Rapid-Cycle Change to Improve COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy in Primary Care.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation and distrust exacerbated disparities in vaccination rates by race and ethnicity throughout the United States. Primary care, public health systems, and community health centers have shifted their vaccination outreach strategies toward these disparate, unvaccinated populations. To support primary care, we developed the SAVE Sprint model for implementing rapid-cycle change to improve vaccination rates by overcoming community outreach barriers and workforce limitations. Participants were recruited for the 10-week SAVE Sprint program through partnerships with the National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) and the Resilient American Communities (RAC) Initiative. The majority of the participants were from community health centers. Data were evaluated during the program through progress reports and surveys, and interviews conducted three months post-intervention were recorded, coded, and analyzed. The SAVE Sprint model of rapid-cycle change exceeded participants' expectations and led to improvements in patient education and vaccination among their vulnerable populations. Participants reported building new skills and identifying strategies for targeting specific populations during a public health emergency. However, participants reported that planning for rapid-pace change and trust-building with community partners prior to a health care crisis is preferable and would make navigating an emergency easier.

Enhancing Collaborative Learning for Quality Improvement: Evidence from the Improving Clinical Flow Project, a Breakthrough Series Collaborative with Project ECHO.

BACKGROUND: This project engaged teams from Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative to improve clinical flow (increase quality and efficiency of operations), using a novel combination of Breakthrough Series Collaborative tools with Project ECHO's telementoring model. This mixed methods study describes the collaborative and evaluates its success in generating improvement and developing QI capacity at participating FQHCs. METHODS: The 18-month collaborative used three in-person/virtual learning session workshops and weekly telementoring sessions with brief lectures and case-based learning. Participants engaged in QI work (for example, PDSAs [Plan-Do-Study-Act]) and tracked data for 10 care system measures to evaluate progress. These data were averaged across consistently reporting sites for standard run chart analysis. Semistructured interviews assessed the effectiveness and value of the approach for participants. RESULTS: Fifteen sites across the United States participated for one year (Cohort 1); 10 sites continued to 18 months (Cohort 2). Cohort 2 evidenced improvement for 6 measures: Patient/Family Experience, Patient Time Valued, Empanelment, Cycle Time, Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate, and Third Next Available Appointment. Progress varied across sites and measures. Participant interviews indicated value from both in-person and virtual activities, increased QI knowledge, and professional growth, as well as challenges when participants lacked time, engagement, leadership support, and consistent and committed staff. CONCLUSION: This novel collaborative structure is promising. Evidence indicates progress in building QI capacity and improving processes and patient experience across participating FQHCs. Future iterations should address barriers to improvement identified here. Additional work is needed to compare the efficacy of this approach to other collaborative modes.