Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 46: 295-302, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046319

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow transplantation is a breakthrough in the world of hematology and oncology. In our region, there is scarce literature studying emergency department visits among BMT patients, as well as their predictors of mortality. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the frequency, reasons, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting to the ED after a BMT, and to study the predictors of mortality in those patients. This study also compares those variables among the different types of BMT. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on all adult patients who have completed a successful BMT and visited the ED. RESULTS: Our study included 115 BMT patients, of whom 17.4% died. Those who died had a higher median number of ED visits than those who did not die. Around 36.5% presented with fever/chills with 29.6% diagnosed with pneumonia on discharge. We found that the odds of mortality were significantly higher among those who presented with dyspnea (p < .0005) and AMS (p = .023), among septic patients (p = .001), those who have undergone allogeneic BMT (p = .037), and those who were admitted to the ICU (p = .002). Moreover, the odds of mortality were significantly higher among hypotensive (p ≤0005) and tachycardic patients (p = .015). CONCLUSION: In our study, we have shown that BMT patients visit the ED very frequently and have high risk of in-hospital mortality. Moreover, our study showed a significant association between mortality and patients with dyspnea, AMS, sepsis, allogeneic BMT type, ICU admission, hypotension and tachycardia.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/mortalidad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Líbano/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria
2.
J Emerg Trauma Shock ; 13(3): 219-223, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33304073

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previously acknowledged as "bedside ultrasound", point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is gaining great recognition nowadays and more physicians are using it to effectively diagnose and adequately manage patients. To measure previous, present and potential adoption of PoCUS and barriers to its use in Canada, Woo et al established the questionnaire "Evaluation Tool for Ultrasound skills Development and Education" (ETUDE) in 2007. This questionnaire sorted respondents into innovators, early adopters, majority, and nonadopters. OBJECTIVES: In this article, we attempt to evaluate the prevalence of PoCUS and the barriers to its adoption in Lebanese EDs, using the ETUDE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The same questionnaire was again utilized in Lebanon to assess the extent of PoCUS adoption. Our target population is emergency physicians (EPs). To achieve a high response rate, hospitals all over Lebanon were contacted to obtain contact details of their EPs. Questionnaires with daily reminders were sent on daily basis. RESULTS: The response rate was higher in our population (78.8%) compared to Woo et al's (36.4%), as the questionnaire was sent by email to each physician with subsequent daily reminders to fill it. In fact, out of the total number of the surveyed (85 physicians), respondents were 67, of which 76.1% were males and of a median age of 43. Using ETUDE, results came as nonadopters (47.8%), majority (28.3%), early adopters (16.4%), and innovators (7.5%). Respondents advocated using PoCUS currently and in the future in five main circumstances: focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) (current 22.9%/future 62.9%), first-trimester pregnancy (current 17.1%/future 68.6%), suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm (current 5.7%/future 51.4%), basic cardiac indications (current 8.6%/future 57.1%), and central venous catheterization (current 22.9%/future 85.7%). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to tackle the extent of use and the hurdles to PoCUS adoption in Lebanese emergency medicine practice, using ETUDE. The findings from this study can be used in Lebanon to strengthen PoCUS use in the future.

3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(6): 1298.e1-1298.e3, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32081551

RESUMEN

Bacterial meningitis is a life-threatening condition that should be addressed as an emergency. The typical culprit microorganisms are targeted empirically with ceftriaxone and vancomycin, in the absence of an immunocompromised state. In this case report, however, we are describing a case of meningitis secondary to Weissella confusa, bacteria inherently resistant to the two drugs commonly used to empirically treat meningitis. Weissella spp. are Gram-positive, catalase-negative coccobacilli and an infrequent cause of infection in humans. Bacteremia followed by endocarditis are the typical clinical manifestations of W. confusa in humans. Other reported manifestations include post-operative osteomyelitis, thumb abscess, infected prosthetic joint, infected peritoneal fluid and peritonitis. To our knowledge, this is the first case of meningitis due to Weissella confusa in the literature. Therefore, we conclude that the isolation of Gram-positive coccobacilli resistant to vancomycin, especially in an immunocompromised host, should raise the suspicion of W. confusa.


Asunto(s)
Meningitis Bacterianas/microbiología , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/efectos de los fármacos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/fisiología , Masculino , Meningitis Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Punción Espinal/métodos , Weissella/efectos de los fármacos , Weissella/aislamiento & purificación , Weissella/patogenicidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...