A post hoc analysis of the EPAZ trial: The role of geriatric variables in elderly soft tissue sarcoma patients on toxicity and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The EPAZ study (NCT01861951) showed recently that pazopanib was non-inferior to doxorubicin in patients ≥60 years treated in first line for advanced soft tissue sarcoma . The current post-hoc analysis aimed to assess the prognostic impact of frailty. METHODS: Geriatric assessments were evaluated at baseline. Age >75 years, liposarcoma, ECOG = 2, G8 ≤14, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) ≥1 and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 were tested for their impact on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs), using univariate and multivariate analysis models. RESULTS: univariate analysis showed an increased risk of grade 3/4 AEs and SAEs for ECOG = 2, G8 score ≤14 or IADL ≥1, independent of treatment. The multivariate analysis exhibited for pazopanib a significantly reduced risk for grade 3/4 AEs (HR 0.53; p = 0.033), and in patients with G8 ≤14 an increased risk for SAEs (HR 2.67; p = 0.011). In the multivariate analysis, G8 ≤14 was a negative prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.82; p = 0.009) and IADL ≥1 for OS (HR 2.02; p = 0.007). ECOG = 2 was the strongest negative predictor for PFS (HR 4.39; p = 0.001) and OS (HR 3.74; p = 0.004). Neither age nor Charlson Comorbidity Index showed any impact on PFS, OS, incidence of grade 3/4 AEs or SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that age is not a denominator for outcome or toxicity in elderly patients with soft tissue sarcoma . Instead, geriatric and functional assessments should be used to counsel patients and tailor therapy to individual needs. Moreover, pazopanib has a reduced risk for grade 3/4 AEs compared to doxorubicin.

Sequential therapy for patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a historical prospective analysis of the German and Israeli experience.

Primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a dismal prognosis. The FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning protocol (total body irradiation or treosulfan-based) has been described as an effective approach in patients with refractory leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. A modified protocol (without amsacrine) has also recently been used. We retrospectively analyzed the transplantation characteristics and outcomes of all consecutive patients between the years 2003 and 2017 (n=51) diagnosed with primary refractory AML who underwent transplantation at the University of Cologne and the Tel Aviv Medical Center. Median age was 54 years and median follow up was 37 months. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 13 (range, 8-19) and 13 (range, 7-30) days, respectively. None of the patients had primary graft failure. Incidences of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), overall and moderate-severe chronic GvHD were 50% (95%CI: 41-67%), 12% (95%CI: 3-25%), 61% (95%CI: 47-72%), and 42% (95%CI: 34-51%), respectively. Anti-thymocyte globulin administration was associated with lower incidence of acute GvHD (HR: 0.327; P=0.02). Non-relapse mortality at three months and three years were 6% and 16%, respectively. Relapse incidences were 6% and 29%, respectively. Overall survival rates at three months, three and five years were 90%, 61%, and 53%, respectively. Chronic GvHD disease was associated with a decreased mortality rate (HR: 0.397; P=0.045). We conclude that sequential therapy in patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia is safe and provides a remarkable anti-leukemic effect with durable survival and should be considered for every patient with primary refractory disease.

OCTET-CY: a phase II study to investigate the efficacy of post-transplant cyclophosphamide as sole graft-versus-host prophylaxis after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide is increasingly used as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of bone marrow transplantation. No data have been published on the use of single-agent GvHD prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in the setting of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). METHODS: In a phase II trial, 11 patients with myeloma or lymphoma underwent conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan followed by T-replete PBSCT and application of 50 mg/kg/d of cyclophosphamide on day+3 and +4 without other concurrent immunosuppression (IS). RESULTS: Median time to leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet engraftment was 18, 21, and 18 d. The incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV GvHD was 45% and 27%, with a non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 36% at one and 2 yr. After median follow-up of 927 d, overall and relapse-free survival was 64% and 34%. Three patients did not require any further systemic IS until day+100 and thereafter. Analysis of immune reconstitution demonstrated rapid T- and NK-cell recovery. B- and CD3+/CD161+NK/T-cell recovery was superior in patients not receiving additional IS. CONCLUSION: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide as sole IS in PBSCT is feasible and allows rapid immune recovery. Increased rates of severe acute GvHD explain the observed NRM and may advise a temporary combination partner such as mTor-inhibitors in the PBSCT setting.