Postoperative thrombotic events following major surgery in patients with a history of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort analysis of commercially insured beneficiaries in the USA.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the synergistic risk of postoperative thrombosis in patients with a history of COVID-19 who undergo major surgery. Major surgery and SARS-CoV-2 infection are independently associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, but the magnitude of additional risk beyond surgery conferred by a COVID-19 history on the development of perioperative thrombotic events has not been clearly elucidated in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among commercially insured adults in the USA from March 2020 to June 2021 using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW), a longitudinal, real-world data asset containing deidentified administrative claims and electronic health records. We compared patients with prior COVID-19 who underwent surgery with control individuals who underwent surgery without a COVID-19 history and with control individuals who did not undergo surgery with and without a COVID-19 history. We assessed the interaction of surgery and previous COVID-19 on perioperative thrombotic events (venous thromboembolism and major adverse cardiovascular events) within 90 days using multivariable logistic regression and interaction analysis. RESULTS: Two million and two-hundred thousand eligible patients were identified from the OLDW. Patients in the surgical cohorts were older and more medically complex than nonsurgical population controls. After adjusting for confounders, only surgical exposure-not COVID-19 history-remained associated with perioperative thrombotic events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.81 to 4.36). The multiplicative interaction term (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.61) and the synergy index (0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04) suggest minimal effect modification of prior COVID-19 on surgery with regards to overall thrombotic risk. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of synergistic thrombotic risk from previous COVID-19 in patients who underwent selected major surgery relative to the baseline thrombotic risk from surgery alone.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons cherché à évaluer le risque synergique de thrombose postopératoire chez les patient·es ayant des antécédents de COVID-19 qui bénéficient d'une intervention chirurgicale majeure. La chirurgie majeure et l'infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 sont indépendamment associées à un risque accru de thrombose, mais l'ampleur du risque supplémentaire d'apparition de complications thrombotiques périopératoires, au-delà de la chirurgie et conféré par des antécédents de COVID-19, n'a pas été clairement élucidée dans la littérature. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective auprès d'adultes assuré·es commercialement aux États-Unis de mars 2020 à juin 2021 à l'aide de la base de données Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW), un actif de données longitudinales du monde réel contenant des requêtes administratives anonymisées et des dossiers de santé électroniques. Nous avons comparé les patient·es ayant déjà souffert de COVID-19 et ayant bénéficié d'une intervention chirurgicale avec des personnes témoins ayant bénéficié d'une intervention chirurgicale sans antécédents de COVID-19 et avec des personnes témoins n'ayant pas bénéficié de chirurgie, avec et sans antécédents de COVID-19. Nous avons évalué l'interaction de la chirurgie et des antécédents de COVID-19 avec les complications thrombotiques périopératoires (thromboembolie veineuse et événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs) dans les 90 jours à l'aide d'une régression logistique multivariée et d'une analyse des interactions. RéSULTATS: Deux millions deux cent mille personnes admissibles ont été identifiées à partir du registre OLDW. Les patient·es des cohortes chirurgicales étaient plus âgé·es et présentaient une plus grande complexité médicale que les personnes témoins de la population non chirurgicale. Après ajustement pour tenir compte des facteurs de confusion, seule l'exposition chirurgicale ­ et non les antécédents de COVID-19 ­ est restée associée aux complications thrombotiques périopératoires (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCa], 4,07; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 3,81 à 4,36). Le terme d'interaction multiplicative (RCa, 1,25; IC 95 %, 0,96 à 1,61) et l'indice de synergie (0,76; IC 95 %, 0,56 à 1,04) suggèrent une modification minimale de l'effet d'un diagnostic antérieur de COVID-19 sur la chirurgie en matière de risque thrombotique global. CONCLUSION: Nous n'avons trouvé aucune preuve de risque thrombotique synergique lié à une COVID-19 antérieure chez les patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une intervention chirurgicale par rapport au risque thrombotique de base lié à la chirurgie seule.

Reducing Volatile Anesthetic Waste Using a Commercial Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support Tool to Lower Fresh Gas Flows.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetic consumption can be reduced by minimizing excessive fresh gas flows (FGFs). Currently, it is unknown whether decision support tools embedded within commercial electronic health record systems can be successfully adopted to achieve long-term reductions in FGF rates. The authors describe the implementation of an electronic health record-based clinical decision support tool aimed at reducing FGF and evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in achieving sustained reductions in FGF rates and volatile anesthetic consumption. METHODS: On August 29, 2018, we implemented a decision support tool within the Epic Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) to alert providers of high FGF (>0.7 L/min for desflurane and >1 L/min for sevoflurane) during maintenance of anesthesia. July 22, 2015, to July 10, 2018, served as our baseline period before the intervention. The intervention period spanned from August 29, 2018, to December 31, 2019. Our primary outcomes were mean FGF (L/min) and volatile agent consumption (mL/MAC-h). Because a simple comparison of 2 time periods may result in false conclusions due to underlying trends independent of the intervention, we performed segmented regression of the interrupted time series to assess the change in level at the start of the intervention and the differences in slopes before and after the intervention. The analysis was also adjusted for potential confounding variables. Data included 44,899 cases using sevoflurane preintervention with 26,911 cases postintervention, and 17,472 cases using desflurane with 1185 cases postintervention. RESULTS: Segmented regression of the interrupted times series demonstrated a decrease in mean FGF by 0.6 L/min (95% CI, 0.6-0.6 L/min; P < .0001) for sevoflurane and 0.2 L/min (95% CI, 0.2-0.3 L/min; P < .0001) for desflurane immediately after implementation of the intervention. For sevoflurane, mL/MAC-h decreased by 3.8 mL/MAC-h (95% CI, 3.6-4.1 mL/MAC-h; P < .0001) after implementation of the intervention and decreased by 4.1 mL/MAC-h (95% CI, 2.6-5.6 mL/MAC-h; P < .0001) for desflurane. Slopes for both FGF and mL/MAC-h in the postintervention period were statistically less negative than the preintervention slopes (P < .0001 for sevoflurane and P < .01 for desflurane). CONCLUSIONS: A commercial AIMS-based decision support tool can be adopted to change provider FGF management patterns and reduce volatile anesthetic consumption in a sustainable fashion.

Intraoperative Use of Albumin in Major Noncardiac Surgery: Incidence, Variability, and Association With Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin use during major surgery is unknown, and a dearth of evidence governing its use in major noncardiac surgery has long precluded its standardization in clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate institutional variation in albumin use among medical centers in the United States during major noncardiac surgery and explore the association of intraoperative albumin administration with important postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The study is an observational retrospective cohort analysis performed among 54 U.S. hospitals in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group and includes adult patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia between January 2014 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of albumin administration. Secondary endpoints are acute kidney injury (AKI), net-positive fluid balance, pulmonary complications, and 30-day mortality. Albumin-exposed and albumin-unexposed cases were compared within a propensity score-matched cohort to evaluate associations of albumin use with outcomes. RESULTS: Among 614,215 major surgeries, predominantly iso-oncotic albumin was administered in 15.3% of cases and featured significant inter-institutional variability in use patterns. Cases receiving intraoperative albumin involved patients of higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and featured larger infused crystalloid volumes, greater blood loss, and vasopressor use. Overall, albumin was most often administered at high-volume surgery centers with academic affiliation, and within a propensity score-matched cohort (n=153,218), the use of albumin was associated with AKI (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.28, P <0.001), severe AKI (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34-1.56, P <0.001), net-positive fluid balance (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20, P <0.001), pulmonary complications (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.30-1.86, P <0.001), and 30-day all-cause mortality (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.26-1.49, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous albumin is commonly administered among noncardiac surgeries with significant inter-institutional variability in use in the United States. Albumin administration was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

Anesthesia Care for Cataract Surgery in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Importance: Cataract surgery in the US is routinely performed with anesthesia care, whereas anesthesia care for other elective, low-risk, outpatient procedures is applied more selectively. Objective: To identify predictors of anesthesia care in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing cataract surgery and evaluate anesthesia care for cataract surgery compared with other elective, low-risk, outpatient procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective observational cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older who underwent cataract surgery in 2017. The data were analyzed from August 2020 through May 2021. Interventions (for clinical trials) or Exposures (for observational studies): Anesthesia care during elective, low-risk, outpatient procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of anesthesia care during cataract surgery compared with other low-risk procedures; association of anesthesia care with patient, clinician, and health system characteristics; and proportion of patients experiencing a systemic complication within 7 days of cataract surgery compared with patients undergoing other low-risk procedures. Results: Among 36 652 cataract surgery patients, the mean (SD) age was 74.7 (6.1) years; 21 690 (59.2%) were female; 2200 (6.6%) were Black and 32 049 (87.4%) were White. Anesthesia care was more common among patients undergoing cataract surgery compared with patients undergoing other low-risk procedures (89.8% vs range of <1% to 70.2%). Neither the patient's age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .01) nor Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (CCI of ≥3: adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95-1.18; P = .28; reference, CCI score of 0-1) was strongly associated with anesthesia care for cataract surgery, but a model comprising a single variable identifying the ophthalmologist predicted anesthesia care with a C statistic of 0.96. Approximately 6.0% of ophthalmologists never used anesthesia care, 76.6% always used anesthesia care, and 17.4% used it for only a subset of patients. Fewer cataract surgery patients experienced systemic complications within 7 days (2833 [7.7%]), even when limited to patients of ophthalmologists who never used anesthesia care (108 [7.4%]), than patients undergoing other low-risk procedures (range, 13.2%-52.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that systemic complications occurred less frequently after cataract surgery compared with other elective, low-risk, outpatient procedures during which anesthesia care was less commonly used. Anesthesia care was not associated with patient characteristics, such as older age or worse health status, but with the ophthalmologists' usual approach to cataract surgery sedation. The study findings suggest an opportunity to use anesthesia care more selectively in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Opioid prescribing practices at hospital discharge for surgical patients before and after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2016 opioid prescribing guideline.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) March 2016 opioid prescribing guideline did not include prescribing recommendations for surgical pain. Although opioid over-prescription for surgical patients has been well-documented, the potential effects of the CDC guideline on providers' opioid prescribing practices for surgical patients in the United States remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) of 37,009 opioid-naïve adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery from 2013-2019 at an academic medical center. We assessed quarterly changes in the discharge opioid prescription days' supply, daily and total doses in oral morphine milligram equivalents (OME), and the proportion of patients requiring opioid refills within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: The discharge opioid prescription declined by -0.021 (95% CI, -0.045 to 0.003) days per quarter pre-guideline versus -0.201 (95% CI, -0.223 to -0.179) days per quarter post-guideline (p < 0.0001). Likewise, the mean daily and total doses of the discharge opioid prescription declined by -0.387 (95% CI, -0.661 to -0.112) and -7.124 (95% CI, -9.287 to -4.962) OME per quarter pre-guideline versus -2.307 (95% CI, -2.560 to -2.055) and -20.68 (95% CI, -22.66 to -18.69) OME per quarter post-guideline, respectively (p < 0.0001). Opioid refill prescription rates remained unchanged from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The release of the CDC opioid guideline was associated with a significant reduction in discharge opioid prescriptions without a concomitant increase in the proportion of surgical patients requiring refills within 30 days. The mean prescription for opioid-naïve surgical patients decreased to less than 3 days' supply and less than 50 OME per day by 2019.

Postoperative Respiratory Events in Surgical Patients Exposed to Opioid Analgesic Shortages Compared to Fully Matched Patients Non-exposed to Shortages.

INTRODUCTION: Shortages of opioid analgesics critically disrupt clinical practice and are detrimental to patient safety. There is a dearth of studies assessing the safety implications of drug shortages. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess perioperative opioid analgesic use and related postoperative hypoxemia (oxygen saturation less than 90%) in surgical patients exposed to prescription opioid shortages compared to propensity score-matched patients non-exposed to opioid shortages. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including adult patients who underwent elective surgery at The University of California San Francisco in the period August 2018-December 2019. We conducted a Gamma log-link generalized linear model to assess the effect of shortages on perioperative use of opioids and a weighted logistic regression to assess the likelihood of experiencing postoperative hypoxemia. RESULTS: There were 1119 patients exposed to opioid shortages and 2787 matched non-exposed patients. After full matching, patients exposed to shortages used a greater mean of morphine milligram equivalents/day (146.94; 95% confidence interval 123.96-174.16) than non-exposed patients (117.92; 95% confidence interval 100.48-138.38; p = 0.0001). The estimated effect was a 1.25 (95% confidence interval 1.12-1.40; p = 0.0001) times greater use of opioids in patients exposed to opioid shortages than non-exposed patients. After full matching, a greater proportion of patients exposed to shortages (19.06%) experienced hypoxemia compared with non-exposed patients (16.91%). In addition, a greater proportion of patients exposed to opioid shortages (1.20%) experienced hypoxemia reversed by intravenous naloxone administration compared with non-exposed patients (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the shortage prevalence, reliance on opioid medications, and related risk of respiratory depression, harm prevention measures remain critical to prevent postoperative complications that may compromise patients' safety.

The Triple Bottom Line and Stabilization Wedges: A Framework for Perioperative Sustainability.

We present a narrative review of environmental sustainability aimed at perioperative clinicians. The review will familiarize readers with the triple bottom line framework, which aims to align the goals of delivering high-quality patient care, promoting environmental sustainability, and improving the financial position of health care organizations. We introduce the stabilization wedges model for climate change action adopted for the perioperative setting and discuss areas in which perioperative leaders can make sustainable choices. The goal of this review is to increase awareness among perioperative physicians of the environmental impacts of surgical and anesthetic care, promote engagement with sustainability efforts as a topic of professional concern for our specialty, and inspire new research in perioperative environmental sustainability.

The association of multimodal analgesia and high-risk opioid discharge prescriptions in opioid-naive surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioids and multimodal analgesia are widely administered to manage postoperative pain. However, little is known on how improvements in inpatient pain control are correlated with high-risk (> 90 daily OME) discharge opioid prescriptions for opioid naïve surgical patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgery from June 2012 through December 2018 at a large academic medical center. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess whether multimodal analgesic drugs consumed in the 24 h prior to discharge was associated with a reduction in high-risk opioid discharge prescriptions. We identified other risk factors for receiving a high-risk discharge opioid prescription. RESULTS: Among the 32,511 patients, 83% of patients were discharged with an opioid prescription. In 2013, 34.1% of patients with a discharge opioid prescription received a high-risk prescription and this declined to 17.7% by 2018. Use of multimodal analgesic agents during the final 24 h of hospitalization increased each year, with over 80% receiving at least one multimodal analgesic agent by 2018. The median OME consumed in the 24 h prior to discharge peaked in 2013 at 31 and steadily decreased to 19.8 by 2018. There was a significant association between the use of acetaminophen in the 24 h prior to discharge and a high-risk prescription at discharge (p < 0.01). OMEs consumed in the 24 h prior to discharge was a significant predictor of receiving a high-risk discharge prescription, even at low doses. Other factors associated with receipt of a high-risk discharge opioid prescription included male gender, race, history of anxiety disorder, and discharge service. DISCUSSION: Use of multimodal analgesia regimens in hospitalized surgical patients in the 24 h prior to hospital discharge increased between 2012 and 2018. Simultaneously, opioid use prior to hospital discharge decreased. Despite these gains, approximately one in five discharge prescriptions was high-risk (> 90 daily OME). In addition, we found that prescribing of discharge opioids above inpatient opioid requirements remains common in opioid naive surgical patients. CONCLUSION: Providers should account for pre-discharge opioid consumption and use of multimodal analgesia when considering the total and daily OME's that may be appropriate for an individual surgical patient on the discharge opioid prescription.

A Novel Metric for Developing Easy-to-Use and Accurate Clinical Prediction Models: The Time-cost Information Criterion.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that clinicians use clinical prediction models to estimate future risk to guide decisions. For example, predicted fracture risk is a major factor in the decision to initiate bisphosphonate medications. However, current methods for developing prediction models often lead to models that are accurate but difficult to use in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and test whether a new metric that explicitly balances model accuracy with clinical usability leads to accurate, easier-to-use prediction models. METHODS: We propose a new metric called the Time-cost Information Criterion (TCIC) that will penalize potential predictor variables that take a long time to obtain in clinical settings. To demonstrate how the TCIC can be used to develop models that are easier-to-use in clinical settings, we use data from the 2000 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (n=6311) to develop and compare time to mortality prediction models using a traditional metric (Bayesian Information Criterion or BIC) and the TCIC. RESULTS: We found that the TCIC models utilized predictors that could be obtained more quickly than BIC models while achieving similar discrimination. For example, the TCIC identified a 7-predictor model with a total time-cost of 44 seconds, while the BIC identified a 7-predictor model with a time-cost of 119 seconds. The Harrell C-statistic of the TCIC and BIC 7-predictor models did not differ (0.7065 vs. 0.7088, P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Accounting for the time-costs of potential predictor variables through the use of the TCIC led to the development of an easier-to-use mortality prediction model with similar discrimination.

Preoperative Medical Testing and Falls in Medicare Beneficiaries Awaiting Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: Delaying cataract surgery is associated with an increased risk of falls, but whether routine preoperative testing delays cataract surgery long enough to cause clinical harm is unknown. We sought to determine whether the use of routine preoperative testing leads to harm in the form of delayed surgery and falls in Medicare beneficiaries awaiting cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study using 2006-2014 Medicare claims. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries 66+ years of age with a Current Procedural Terminology claim for ocular biometry. METHODS: We measured the mean and median number of days between biometry and cataract surgery, calculated the proportion of patients waiting ≥ 30 days or ≥ 90 days for surgery, and determined the odds of sustaining a fall within 90 days of biometry among patients of high-testing physicians (testing performed in ≥ 75% of their patients) compared with patients of low-testing physicians. We also estimated the number of days of delay attributable to high-testing physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of falls occurring between biometry and surgery, odds of falling within 90 days of biometry, and estimated delay associated with physician testing behavior. RESULTS: Of 248 345 beneficiaries, 16.4% were patients of high-testing physicians. More patients of high-testing physicians waited ≥ 30 days and ≥ 90 days to undergo surgery (31.4% and 8.2% vs. 25.0% and 5.5%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). Falls before surgery in patients of high-testing physicians increased by 43% within the 90 days after ocular biometry (1.0% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.0001). The adjusted odds ratio of falling within 90 days of biometry in patients of high-testing physicians versus low-testing physicians was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.19; P = 0.008). After adjusting for surgical wait time, the odds ratio decreased to 1.07 (95% CI, 1.00-1.15; P = 0.06). The delay associated with having a high-testing physician was approximately 8 days (estimate, 7.97 days; 95% CI, 6.40-9.55 days; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with delayed surgery included patient race (non-White), Northeast region, ophthalmologist ≤ 40 years of age, and low surgical volume. CONCLUSIONS: Overuse of routine preoperative medical testing by high-testing physicians is associated with delayed surgery and increased falls in cataract patients awaiting surgery.

Language-Related Disparities in Pain Management in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit for Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Race and ethnicity are associated with disparities in pain management in children. While low English language proficiency is correlated with minority race/ethnicity in the United States, it is less frequently explored in the study of health disparities. We therefore investigated whether English language proficiency influenced pain management in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in a cohort of children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our pediatric hospital in San Francisco. Our primary exposure was English language proficiency, and our primary outcome was administration of any opioid medication in the PACU. Secondary outcomes included the amount of opioid administered in the PACU and whether any pain score was recorded during the patient's recovery period. Statistical analysis included adjusting for demographic covariates including race in estimating the effect of language proficiency on these outcomes. In our cohort of 257 pediatric patients, 57 (22.2%) had low English proficiency (LEP). While LEP and English proficient (EP) patients received the same amount of opioid medication intraoperatively, in multivariable analysis, LEP patients had more than double the odds of receiving any opioid in the PACU (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.22-4.92). LEP patients received more oral morphine equivalents (OME) than EP patients (1.64 OME/kg, CI 0.67-3.84), and they also had almost double the odds of having no pain score recorded during their PACU recovery period (OR 1.93, CI 0.79-4.73), although the precision of these estimates was limited by small sample size. Subgroup analysis showed that children over the age of 5 years, who were presumably more verbal and would therefore undergo verbal pain assessments, had over triple the odds of having no recorded pain score (OR 3.23, CI 1.48-7.06). In summary, English language proficiency may affect the management of children's pain in the perioperative setting. The etiology of this language-related disparity is likely multifactorial and should be investigated further.

Perioperative Prescribing Practices of Extended-Release Opioids in Noncancer Surgical Patients, 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release (ER) opioids are indicated for the management of persistent moderate to severe pain in patients requiring around-the-clock opioid analgesics for an extended period of time. Concerns have been raised regarding safety of ER opioids due to its potential for abuse and dependence. However, little is known about perioperative prescribing practices of ER opioids. This study assessed perioperative prescribing practices of ER opioids in noncancer surgical patients stratified by type of opioid exposure prior to admission and examined predictors of postoperative opioid administration in oral morphine equivalents (OME). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the University of California San Francisco Medical Center electronic health record data. This study included 25,396 adult noncancer patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia in the period 2015-2018. The primary study outcome was predictors of postoperative administration of opioids in hospitalized surgical patients. Secondary outcomes included patients discontinued and initiated on ER opioids during their hospital stay. RESULTS: substance use disorder diagnosis and use of opioids, surgery type, and postoperative administration of nonopioid analgesics were associated with postoperative administration of opioids (P < .0001). The estimated adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of postoperative administration of OME prior to admission in ER opioid users (170.08 mg; 147.08-196.67) was twice the amount for opioid-naïve patients (81.36 mg; 70.7-93.63; P < .0001). One in 5 prior to admission ER opioid users were weaned off ER opioids while hospitalized without adversely affecting their postoperative pain or hospital length of stay (LOS). Four of 5 patients who used ER opioids prior to admission also received ER opioids after surgery, whereas, 1 in 100 opioid-naïve patients received ER opioids during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variability in the perioperative prescribing practices of ER opioids in hospitalized noncancer surgical patients by use of opioids prior to admission and surgery type. Pain medicine practitioners and surgeons may play a significant role tackling the surgery-related risk of exposure to ER opioids and decreasing opioid-related complications.

Association Between Physician Industry Payments and Cost of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical spine specialists receive considerable amounts of industry support that may impact the cost of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between industry payments received by spine surgeons and the total hospital and operating room (OR) costs of an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: All ACDF cases were identified among the Medicare carrier files from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, and matched to the Medicare inpatient baseline file. The total hospital and OR charges were obtained for these cases. Charges were converted to cost using year-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Surgeons were identified among the Open Payments database, which is used to quantify industry support. Analyses were performed to examine the association between industry payments received and ACDF costs. RESULTS: Matching resulting in the inclusion of 2209 ACDF claims from 2013-2014. In 2013 and 2014, the mean total cost for an ACDF was $21,798 and $21,008, respectively; mean OR cost was $5878 and $6064, respectively. Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated no significant differences in the mean total or OR cost for an ACDF based on quartile of general industry payment received (P = 0.21 and P = 0.54), and linear regression found no association between industry general payments, research support, or investments on the total hospital cost (P = 0.41, P = 0.13, and P = 0.25, respectively), or OR cost for an ACDF (P = 0.35, P = 0.24, and P = 0.40, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that spine surgeons performing ACDF surgeries may receive industry support without impacting the cost of care.

Assessment of Unused Opioids Following Ambulatory Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a risk factor for opioid initiation and subsequent abuse. Discharge opioid prescription patterns after surgery are often varied and not evidence based, which may lead to unnecessary prescription of opioids. We aimed to assess opioid prescribing and unused opioid prescriptions in ambulatory surgery patients at our academic hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study based on phone survey and electronic medical records. Adult patients who underwent ambulatory surgery at our large, multisite, tertiary-care hospital system were asked whether they were using the opioids that were prescribed at discharge. Our main outcomes were opioid prescription (defined as being prescribed an opioid on discharge) and unused opioid prescription (defined as being prescribed an opioid but not taking any opioids on postoperative day 1). We evaluated predictors of opioid prescription and unused opioid prescription through univariable and multivariable analyses. We also stratified outcomes by surgical service. RESULTS: Of 4248 adult patients who underwent ambulatory surgical procedures, 3279 (77.2%) responded to the survey. Of all responders, 2146 (65.4%) were prescribed postoperative opioids, and 1240 (57.8%) reported not taking them on postoperative day 1. The highest rates of unused opioid prescriptions were for patients whose primary service were orthopedic surgery (65%) and plastic surgery (62%). DISCUSSION: Opioid prescribing and unused opioid prescriptions are prevalent in our hospital's ambulatory surgical population. Patients undergoing selected ambulatory surgical procedures may not require as much opioid as is currently being prescribed.

Assessment of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Opioid Analgesics Requiring Prior Opioid Tolerance.

Importance: Opioid-tolerant only (OTO) medications, such as transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl products and certain extended-release opioid analgesics, require prior opioid tolerance for safe use, as patients without tolerance may be at increased risk of overdose. Studies using insurance claims have found that many patients initiating these medications do not appear to be opioid tolerant. Objectives: To measure prevalence of opioid tolerance in patients initiating OTO medications and to determine whether linked electronic health record (EHR) data contribute evidence of opioid tolerance not found in insurance claims data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a national database of deidentified longitudinal health information, including medical and pharmacy claims, insurance enrollment, and EHR data, from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. Data included 131 756 US residents with at least 183 days of continuous enrollment in commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance (including medical and pharmacy benefits) who had received an OTO medication and who had no inpatient stays in the 30 days prior to starting an OTO medication; of these, 20 044 individuals had linked EHR data within the prior 183 days. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018. Exposures: Initiating an OTO medication. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prior opioid tolerance demonstrated through pharmacy fills or EHR data on prescriptions written. Results: Among 153 385 OTO use episodes identified, 89 029 (58.0%) occurred among women, 62 900 (41.0%) occurred among patients with Medicare Advantage insurance, 39 394 (25.7%) occurred in the Midwest, 17 366 (11.3%) occurred in the Northeast, 73 316 (47.8%) occurred in the South, and 23 309 (15.2%) occurred in the West. Less than half of use episodes (73 117 episodes [47.7%]) involved patients with evidence in claims data of opioid tolerance prior to initiating therapy with an OTO medication, including 31 392 of 101 676 episodes (30.9%) involving transdermal fentanyl, 1561 of 2440 episodes (64.0%) involving transmucosal fentanyl, 36 596 of 43 559 episodes (84.0%) involving extended-release oxycodone, and 3568 of 5710 episodes (62.5%) involving extended-release hydromorphone. Among 20 044 OTO use episodes with linked EHR and claims data, less than 1% of OTO episodes identified in claims had evidence of opioid tolerance in structured EHR data that was not present in claims data (108 episodes [0.5%]). After limiting the sample to OTO episodes identified in claims with a matching OTO prescription within 14 days in the structured EHR data, only 40 of 939 episodes (4.0%) occurred among patients with evidence of tolerance that was not present in claims data. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that most patients initiating OTO medications did not have evidence of prior opioid tolerance, suggesting they were at increased risk of opioid-related harms, including fatal overdose. Data from EHRs did not contribute substantial additional evidence of opioid tolerance beyond the data found in prescription claims. Future research is needed to understand the clinical rationale behind these observed prescribing patterns and to quantify the risk of harm to patients associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing.