The utility of endoscopy prior to bariatric surgery: an 11-year retrospective analysis of 885 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of routine preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (p-EGD) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Many medical problems that are common in patients with obesity, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernias, have important implications for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. While p-EGD is considered standard of care prior to antireflux surgery, the role of p-EGD in bariatric surgery patients remains controversial. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We performed a retrospective chart review of 885 patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a university hospital-based bariatric surgery program between March 2011 and February 2022. Clinical history, demographics, and preoperative EGD reports were reviewed for abnormal findings. RESULTS: Of the 885 patients evaluated in this study, one or more abnormal EGD findings were observed in 83.2% of patients. More than half of our patients (54.7%) presented with history of heartburn, reflux, or GERD. EGD findings demonstrated a hernia in 43.1% of patients [(Type I: 40.6%; Type II: 0.5%; Type III: 2.1%)]. 68.0% of patients were biopsied. Among patients who were biopsied, other findings included gastritis (32.4%), esophagitis (8.0%), eosinophilic esophagitis (4.7%), or duodenitis (2.7%). We found ulcers in 6.7% of patients. Pathology was consistent with H. pylori in 9.8% of biopsies taken and consistent with BE in 2.7%. Following routine p-EGD, 11.2% of patients were placed on PPI and 8.3% were recommended to stop NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated pathology are common in the bariatric population. Preoperative EGD in patients undergoing bariatric surgery frequently identifies clinically significant UGI pathology. This may have important implications for medical and surgical management. Given the rate of abnormal preoperative endoscopic findings in obese patients, the work-up for bariatric surgery should align with the current recommendations for foregut surgery.

Repairing small type I hiatal hernias at the time of RYGB is not necessary to achieve resolution of reflux symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with severe obesity, but there is variability in surgeon opinion regarding whether small type I hiatal hernias (HH) require routine repair concurrently with RYGB. We sought to examine whether leaving small type I HHs unrepaired during RYGB affected GERD outcomes. METHODS: Pre-operatively our patients all receive endoscopy, and select patients with reflux symptoms receive esophagram based on attending surgeon practice and preference. We routinely repair paraesophageal hernias (PEH) concurrently with RYGB, but refrain from repairing small type I HH if, intra-operatively, the gastric fat pad and cardia are below the diaphragm with no evidence of retraction into the mediastinum. Records from 268 consecutive patients undergoing primary RYGB between January 2016 and February 2021 who completed pre-operative GERD-HRQL assessments were reviewed for presence of type I HH or PEH. Mann-Whitney U tests examined the pre-operative to post-operative change in GERD-HRQL in patients with type I HH left unrepaired at the time of RYGB (HH group) and patients with no hernia (NH group). RESULTS: Pre-operatively, GERD-HRQL scores were not statistically different between HH group (median = 7, mean = 8.5, n = 100) and NH group (median = 6.5, mean = 7.2, n = 141) (p > 0.05). Post-operatively, there was no increase in GERD-HRQL scores patients whose hernias were left unrepaired. Neither group had clinically pathologic post-operative GERD-HRQL scores, with median 6 months scores of 1 for HH group (n = 68) versus 1.5 for NH group (n = 90) (p > 0.05), and median 12 months scores of 1.5 for HH group (n = 40) versus 1 for NH group (n = 56) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Repair of small type I HH is not necessary to achieve effective, durable resolution of reflux symptoms with RYGB. Omitting repair reduces operative time, cost, and potential risk without adverse impact on post-operative reflux symptoms.

What is the Best Inguinal Hernia Repair?

As the management of inguinal hernias have evolved over hundreds of years, so too has our paradigm of what constitutes the "best repair." To best answer what the ideal inguinal hernia repair is, the authors take an in-depth look at considerations to the patient, the provider, and the health care system.

Influence of sociodemographic variables on weight loss outcomes up to 3-years following primary bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Our group has previously demonstrated that low socioeconomic status (SES) independently predicts ≤ 25th percentile weight-loss following bariatric surgery (BS). Given that sociodemographic metrics can be separated into income, education, and race, we sought to investigate how each metric independently impacted weight loss following BS. METHODS: Patients from a single academic institution who underwent bariatric surgery from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by income (low/high), education (≤ high school/ ≥ college), and race (black/white) then compared using univariate analysis. Variables significant on univariate analyses were subsequently used for a greedy 1:3 propensity score match with a caliper of 0.2. After matching, groups were balanced on demographics, social/medical/psychological history, and surgery type. Percent excess body weight loss for each post-operative time point was compared using appropriate univariate analyses. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 571 patients were included. Unmatched race analysis demonstrated black patients were significantly younger (p = 0.05), single (p < 0.0001), in a lower income bracket (p < 0.0001), and experienced less weight loss at 2- (p = 0.01), 6- (p = 0.007), 12- (p = 0.008) and 24- (p = 0.007) months post-op. After matching, black patients continued to experience less weight loss at 2- (p = 0.01) and 6- (p = 0.03) months, which trended at 1 year (p = 0.06). Initial income analysis demonstrated patients in the low-income group (LIG) were more likely to be black (p < 0.0001), have ≤ high school education (p = 0.004), a higher preoperative BMI (p = 0.008), and lower postoperative weight loss at 2- (p = 0.001), 6- (p = 0.01), and 12- (p = 0.04) months after surgery. After matching, no differences were observed up to 3-years post-op. Analysis of education demonstrated no effect on weight loss in both unmatched and matched analyses. CONCLUSION: Unmatched analysis demonstrated that low income and race impact short-term weight loss after BS. After matching, however, race, not socioeconomic status, predicted weight loss outcomes up to 1-year.

Use of the MMPI-2 personality profile in predicting 30-day ED-visits and readmissions following primary bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is used for psychological screening of bariatric surgery (BS) candidates. To date, no studies have analyzed the relationship between MMPI-2 and early returns to hospital. The aim of this study was to determine whether high T scores on the MMPI-2 clinical scales were associated with early return to hospital after primary bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients who completed an MMPI-2 evaluation, undergoing primary BS from 2014 to 2016 were evaluated. T score for the tested scales were collected and stratified into a high T score (T > 65) vs not (T < 65). The optimal 'cut-point' (specific number of high T scores predicting likelihood for 30-day ED-visit/hospital readmission) was calculated using Youden's Index (J) = Max(c) [sensitivity (c) + specificity (c) - 1], where c = number of scales with a T score > 65. Patients were stratified based on the optimal cut-point which was determined to be ≥ 4 high T scores. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify differences between groups and predictors for early ED-visits and hospital readmissions. RESULTS: 375 patients had psychological evaluations available for review. Patients were divided into those with ≥ 4 high T scores (Scr(≥4); n = 86) versus not (Scr (<4); n = 289). Multivariate analysis showed Scr(≥ 4) (aOR 2.99, CI 1.20-7.47; p = 0.019), bipolar disorder (aOR 4.82, CI 1.25-18.83; p = 0.022), and urgent hospital complications (aOR 6.81, CI 2.02-22.91; p = 0.002), were significant independent predictors of 30-day readmissions. Early ED-visits were significantly predicted by public insurance (aOR 3.30, CI 1.22-8.91; p = 0.019), but the effect of the Scr(≥4) profile (aOR 2.42, CI 0.97-6.09; p = 0.06), while influential, did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: Differences in personality traits may be associated increased 30-day readmissions following primary bariatric surgery. Our study represents a novel application of the MMPI-2.

Tobacco use is not associated with increased risk of recurrent reflux 5 years after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use worsens gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD). Smoking cessation improves GERD symptoms, but its impact on the efficacy of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) is unclear. In this retrospective cohort study, we hypothesized that non-smokers would demonstrate greater long-term improvements in disease-specific quality of life than active smokers. METHODS: Data were maintained in an IRB-approved prospective database, and patients were stratified according to tobacco use. Postoperative follow-up occurred in clinic and long-term follow-up via telephone interview. Outcomes measured were gastroesophageal health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and GERD symptom scale (GERSS) scores, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cessation, and satisfaction with surgery. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-five patients underwent primary LARS, and 31 (13%) were active smokers with 18 median pack-years [10-30]. Baseline PPI use (96% vs. 94%, p = 0.64), presence of a hiatal hernia (79% vs. 68%, p = 0.13), esophagitis (28% vs. 45%, p = 0.13), and DeMeester score (41.9 vs. 33.6, p = 0.47) were similar. Baseline GERD-HRQL and GERSS scores and their post-surgical decreases were also similar between groups. PPI cessation was achieved in 92% of non-smokers and 94% of smokers (p = 0.79), and GERD-HRQL scores decreased to 4 [1-7] and 5 [0-12], respectively (p = 0.53). After 59 [25-74] months, GERD-HRQL scores were 5 [2-11] and 2 [0-13] (p = 0.61) and PPI cessation was maintained in 69% and 79% of patients (p = 0.59). Satisfaction with surgery was similar between smokers and non-smokers (88% vs. 87%, p = 0.85). Female gender was significantly associated with increased improvements in GERD-HRQL (p < 0.01) and GERSS scores (p = 0.04) postoperatively but not at long-term follow-up. Patients without a hiatal hernia were less likely to achieve long-term PPI cessation compared to those with a hernia (OR 0.23, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years, smokers demonstrate similar symptom resolution, PPI cessation rates, and satisfaction with surgery as non-smokers. Active smoking does not appear to negatively impact long-term symptomatic outcomes of LARS.

Thermal Coagulation Device for Treating Cervical Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite being a highly preventable disease. Nine out of every 10 deaths due to cervical cancer occur in developing regions with limited access to medical care and unique resource constraints. To address cervical cancer prevention within the confines of these unique limitations, our team of students and faculty advisors at the University of Utah's Center for Medical Innovation developed a low-cost, portable technology that utilizes thermal coagulation, a form of heat ablation, to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of students worked with clinical and industry advisors to develop a globally applicable treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia through a systematic process of problem validation, stakeholder analysis, user-centered design, business plan development, and regulatory clearance. RESULTS: Our efforts resulted in the development of a functional, self-contained, battery-operated prototype within 72 days, followed by Food and Drug Administration clearance of a finalized device within 18 months. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary university programs that leverage the capabilities of academic-industry partnerships can accelerate the development and commercialization of affordable medical technologies to solve critical global health issues.

Watchful waiting versus elective repair for asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the decision of watchful waiting (WW) versus elective laparoscopic hernia repair (ELHR) for minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEH) with respect to cost-effectiveness. BACKGROUND: The current recommendation for minimally symptomatic PEHs is watchful waiting. This standard is based on a decision analysis from 2002 that compared the two strategies on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Since that time, the safety of ELHR has improved. A cost-effectiveness study for PEH repair has not been reported. METHODS: A Markov decision model was developed to compare the strategies of WW and ELHR for minimally symptomatic PEH. Input variables were estimated from published studies. Cost data was obtained from Medicare. Outcomes for the two strategies were cost and QALY's. RESULTS: ELHR was superior to the WW strategy in terms of quality of life, but it was more costly. The average cost for a patient in the ELHR arm was 11,771 dollars while for the WW arm it was 2207. CONCLUSION: This study shows that WW and ELHR both have benefits in the management of minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias.

Dual Ring Wound Protector Reduces Circular Stapler Related Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: While there are various techniques to create the gastrojejunostomy during a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), many surgeons prefer using a circular stapler. One drawback of this method, however, is the higher incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). To investigate the effect of a dual ring wound protector on SSIs during LRYGB. METHODS: In April 2016, our bariatric surgical group implemented an intervention whereby a dual ring wound protector in conjunction with a conical EEA stapler introducer was used when creating the gastrojejunostomy. SSIs from pre- and post-intervention were compared using Fisher's exact test. Only LRYGBs performed with a circular stapler were included in our analysis. Student's t test and χ2 were used to compare pre- and post-intervention groups with respect to demographics and co-morbidities. RESULTS: Between April 2015 and January 31st, 2017, our surgeons performed 158 LRYGBs using a circular stapler for the gastrojejunostomy. There were 84 patients (53%) in the pre-intervention group and 74 (47%) in the post-intervention group. The pre- and post-intervention groups were not statistically different. The SSI rate for the pre-intervention group was 9.5% while the SSI rate was 1.35% in the post-intervention group (p = 0.0371). The use of a dual ring wound protector for LRYGBs with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy was associated with an 86% relative risk reduction in SSIs. CONCLUSION: Using a dual ring wound protector in conjunction with a conical EEA introducer for LRYGBs with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy significantly decreased SSIs.

Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Physician review websites such as Vitals and Healthgrades are becoming an increasingly popular tool for patients to choose providers. We hypothesized that the scores of these surveys poorly represent the true value of patient satisfaction when compared to a validated survey instrument. METHODS: Answers from Vitals and Healthgrades online surveys were compared to the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey (PGMPS) for 200 faculty members at a university hospital for FY15. Weighted Pearson's correlation was used to compare Healthgrades and Vitals to PGMPS. RESULTS: While statistically significant, both Vitals and Healthgrades had very low correlations with the PGMPS with weighted coefficients of 0.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.34, P = 0.025) and 0.27 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.42, P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Online physician rating websites such as Vitals and Healthgrades poorly correlate with the PGMPS, a validated measure of patient satisfaction. Patients should be aware of these limitations and, consequently, should have access to the most accurate measure of patient satisfaction.

Early Diagnosis and Prevention of Ischemic Enterocolitis in Massive Burns.

To summarize the most salient literature regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prevention of ischemic enterocolitis (IE) in thermal injury. IE is a poorly characterized gastrointestinal complication associated with large burns. This entity occurs irrespective of abdominal trauma. The diagnostic challenges, paucity of treatment options and related complications make IE particularly lethal. Herein we present a case of profound IE in a 40-year-old male who sustained 80% total body surface area (TBSA) burns. We provide an overview of our current understanding of IE, discuss early diagnostic strategies, and review possible treatment options. Although there are several promising biomarkers of early IE and potential treatment strategies, prospective studies are lacking. IE secondary to massive thermal injury is a lethal complication of severely burned patients. Early recognition and evidenced-based treatment strategies are paramount to successful management of patients with IE. Additional research and prospective trials are warranted given this devastating complication of massive burns.

Preventing Returns to the Emergency Department FollowingBariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits following bariatric surgery represent a significant source of inefficient resource utilization. This study aimed to identify potential strategies aimed at preventing unnecessary returns to the ED following bariatric surgery. The study was conducted in University Hospital, USA. METHODS: The electronic medical records of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery at our institution between January 2011 and October 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding procedure, gender, age, preoperative BMI, obesity-related comorbid conditions, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and reasons for ED visits within 90 days of surgery were obtained. Six practitioners (four attending surgeons, one resident physician, and one physician assistant) independently reviewed patient chief complaint and clinical findings at the time of ED returns. Reasons for ED return were scored as either preventable or non-preventable. "Preventable" denoted that an ED return could potentially be avoided by means of a system change in our bariatric practice. RESULTS: Our institution performed 361 bariatric procedures during the study period. Of these, 65 patients had 91 ED visits, 23 of which resulted in readmissions, and two of which required operative interventions. The ≤90-day all-cause postoperative ED visit rate was 18% (n = 65). Of the 91 ED visits, 47% were deemed preventable (n = 43). The most common preventable reasons for ED returns were nausea, vomiting, dehydration (NVD) (27.9%), postoperative pain (25.6%), wound evaluations (20.9%), and compliance issues (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ED visits following bariatric surgery are prevalent and costly. Many of these visits are potentially preventable. Implementing outpatient strategies to address these causes will likely attenuate inefficient resource utilization.

Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.

INTRODUCTION: Ferromagnetic heating is a new electrosurgery energy modality that has proven effective in hemostatic tissue dissection as well as sealing and dividing blood vessels and vascularized tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a ferromagnetic-based laparoscopic vessel sealing device with respect to sealing and dividing vessels and vascularized tissue and to compare performance against current vessel sealing technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A laparoscopic vessel sealing device, Laparoscopic FMsealer (LFM), was studied for efficacy in sealing and dividing blood vessels and comparative studies against predicate ultrasonic, Harmonic Ace+(US), and/or bipolar, LigaSure 5 mm Blunt Tip and/or Maryland (BP), devices in vivo using a swine model and in vitro for comparison of seal burst pressure and reliability. Mann-Whitney and Student t test were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: In division of 10 cm swine small bowel mesentery in vivo, the laparoscopic FMsealer [12.4±1.8 sec (mean±SD)], was faster compared with US (26.8±2.5 s) and BP (30.0±2.7 s), P<0.05 LFM versus US and BP. Blinded histologic evaluation of 5 mm vessel seals in vivo showed seal lateral thermal spread to be superior in LFM (1678±433 µm) and BP (1796±337 µm) versus US (2032±387 µm), P<0.001. In vitro, seal burst strength and success of sealing 2 to 4 mm arteries were as follows (mean±SD mm Hg, % success burst strength >240 mm Hg): LFM (1079±494 mm Hg, 98.1% success) versus BP (1012±463, 99.0%), P=NS. For 5 to 7 mm arteries: LFM (1098±502 mm Hg, 95.3% success) versus BP (715±440, 91.8%), P<0.001 in burst strength and P=NS in % success. Five 60 kg female swine underwent 21-day survival studies following ligation of vessels ranging from 1 to 7 mm in diameter (n=186 total vessels). Primary seal was successful in 97%, 99% including salvage seals. There was no evidence of postoperative bleeding at sealed vessels at 21-day necropsy. CONCLUSION: The Laparoscopic FMsealer is an effective tool for sealing and dividing blood vessels and vascularized tissue and compares favorably to current technologies in clinically relevant end points.

Industry-academic partnerships: an approach to accelerate innovation.

BACKGROUND: Biotechnology companies are process-driven organizations and often struggle with their ability to innovate. Universities, on the other hand, thrive on discovery and variation as a source of innovation. As such, properly structured academic-industry partnerships in medical technology development may enhance and accelerate innovation. Through joint industry-academic efforts, our objective was to develop a technology aimed at global cervical cancer prevention. METHODS: Our Center for Medical Innovation assembled a multidisciplinary team of students, surgical residents, and clinical faculty to enter in the University of Utah's annual Bench-to-Bedside competition. Bench-to-Bedside is a university program centered on medical innovation. Teams are given access to university resources and are provided $500.00 for prototype development. Participation by team members are on a volunteer basis. Our industry partner presented the validated need and business mentorship. The team studied the therapeutic landscape, environmental constraints, and used simulation to understand human factors design and usage requirements. A physical device was manufactured by first creating a digital image (SOLIDWORKS 3D CAD). Then, using a 3-dimensional printer (Stratasys Objet30 Prime 3D printer), the image was translated into a physical object. Tissue burn depth analysis was performed on raw chicken breasts warmed to room temperature. Varying combinations of time and temperature were tested, and burn depth and diameter were measured 30 min after each trial. An arithmetic mean was calculated for each corresponding time and temperature combination. User comprehension of operation and sterilization was tested via a participant validation study. Clinical obstetricians and gynecologists were given explicit instructions on usage details and then asked to operate the device. Participant behaviors and questions were recorded. RESULTS: Our efforts resulted in a functional battery-powered hand-held thermocoagulation prototype in just 72 d. Total cost of development was <$500. Proof of concept trials at 100°C demonstrated an average ablated depth and diameter of 4.7 mm and 23.3 mm, respectively, corresponding to treatment efficacy of all grades of precancerous cervical lesions. User comprehension studies showed variable understanding with respect to operation and sterilization instructions. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with using industry-academic partnerships as a means to create medical technologies resulted in the rapid production of a low-cost device that could potentially serve as an integral piece of the "screen-and-treat" approach to premalignant cervical lesions as outlined by World Health Organization. This case study highlights the impact of accelerating medical advances through industry-academic partnership that leverages their combined resources.

The prevalence and impact of defensive medicine in the radiographic workup of the trauma patient: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Defensive medicine is estimated to cost the United States $210 billion annually. Trauma surgeons are at risk of practicing defensive medicine in the form of reflexively ordering computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study is to quantify the monetary impact and radiation exposure related to the radiographic workup of trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study involving 295 trauma patients at Level I trauma center. Physicians were surveyed regarding specific CT scans ordered, likelihood of significant injuries found on scans, and which scans would have been ordered in a hypothetical, litigation-free environment. RESULTS: Four hundred sixteen of 1,097 CT scans (38%) were ordered out of defensive purposes. Nine CT scans (2.2%) that would not have been ordered resulted in a change in management. Defensively ordered CT scans resulted in nearly $120,000 in excess charges and 8.8 mSv of unnecessary radiation per patient. CONCLUSION: Defensively ordered CT scan in the workup of trauma patients is a prevalent and costly practice that exposes patients to potentially unnecessary and harmful radiation.