Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(2): 182-189, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882155

RESUMEN

During the COVID-19 pandemic, government social marketing messages support strategies of suppression (often stay-at-home orders or lockdowns) and/or mitigation (through testing, isolation, and tracing). Success at lowering the virus reproduction rate (R0) depends on social marketing messaging that rapidly changes behaviors. This study explores a potential side effect of a successful antivirus public health messaging campaign, when employees are back at work but the virus threat has not disappeared, that leads to on-the-job stress. The authors surveyed office employees in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China, where a nearly 2-month COVID-19 quarantine ended in late March 2020 and work locations reopened with strong public health messaging to encourage cooperation with continued virus spread suppression strategies-an approach likely to be followed in numerous countries. This study examines the relationship of pandemic public messaging sensitivity with tension and negative emotions on the job. Canonical correlation analysis is used with a sample of 1154 respondents, 4 predictor variables (reference group, self-regulation, media, and risk), and 2 criterion variables (negative emotions and job tension). Results show employees are differentially affected by the pandemic background noise. Those more sensitive to social-level virus risks and more open to reference group influence report increased levels of negative emotions and work tension.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Comunicación , Reinserción al Trabajo/psicología , Mercadeo Social , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , China , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(24)2020 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Objective assessment of shoulder joint active range of motion (AROM) is critical to monitor patient progress after conservative or surgical intervention. Advancements in miniature devices have led researchers to validate inertial sensors to capture human movement. This study investigated the construct validity as well as intra- and inter-rater reliability of active shoulder mobility measurements using a coupled system of inertial sensors and the Microsoft Kinect (HumanTrak). METHODS: 50 healthy participants with no history of shoulder pathology were tested bilaterally for fixed and free ROM: (1) shoulder flexion, and (2) abduction using HumanTrak and goniometry. The repeat testing of the standardised protocol was completed after seven days by two physiotherapists. RESULTS: All HumanTrak shoulder movements demonstrated adequate reliability (intra-class correlation (ICC) ≥ 0.70). HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.93 and 0.85) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.75 and 0.53) for measuring free shoulder flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Similarly, HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.81 and 0.94) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.70 and 0.93) for fixed flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Construct validity between HumanTrak and goniometry was adequate except for free abduction. The differences between raters were predominately acceptable and below ±10°. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the HumanTrak system is an objective, valid and reliable way to assess and track shoulder ROM.


Asunto(s)
Rango del Movimiento Articular , Hombro , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
J Altern Complement Med ; 25(12): 1206-1214, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580714

RESUMEN

Objective: To quantify differences in patient expectations of healthscape (e.g., interior environment) across Western medicine (WM) and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) paradigms. Data sources/study setting: Primary survey data comprise 469 Taiwanese consumers. National insurance coverage of both TCM and WM is an ideal setting to test for differences in healthscape expectations. Study design: Respondents report their recent experience as either exclusive users of TCM, exclusive WM, neither, or dual usage (both TCM and WM), and are randomly assigned to one of two surveys (identical except one refers to WM contexts, the other TCM) to rate the importance of 28 healthscape factors derived from previous studies. Data collection/extraction methods: Multivariate analysis of variance is used to test the research hypotheses. Principal findings: Dual users accept some differences across paradigms. In contrast, exclusive WM users apply their existing WM expectations to TCM contexts, raising the possibility of dissatisfaction and low adoption. Conclusions: A person's experience with TCM is related to acceptance of healthscape differences. Medical service providers of TCM, and by extension complementary and alternative medicine, should devise strategies to ease initial visitation by exclusive WM users. Healthscape designs need not be modeled closely on a WM standard, as dual users accept differences.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud , Medicina Tradicional China , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Taiwán , Adulto Joven
4.
Aust J Physiother ; 55(1): 17-23, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19226238

RESUMEN

QUESTION: Is the addition of passive mobilisation of shoulder region joints to advice and exercise for patients with shoulder pain and stiffness more effective than advice and exercise alone? DESIGN: Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 90 people who had shoulder pain and stiffness for more than one month. INTERVENTION: All participants received advice and exercise. The experimental group also received passive joint mobilisation of shoulder region joints. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included pain and disability measured with the 13-point Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures were self-perceived global improvement measured on a 6-point scale and active ranges of motion. Subjects received a maximum of 10 sessions of therapy. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline, one month, and six months. RESULTS: The experimental group had 3% (95% CI -5 to 11) less pain and disability than the control group at one month and 1% (95% CI -13 to 16) less pain at six months, which are statistically nonsignificant. Their global perceived effect was 0.1 out of 5 (95% CI -0.2 to 0.4) worse than the control group at one month and 0.1 (95% CI -0.5 to 0.7) better at 6 months, which are also statistically non-significant. Differences between groups in all range of motion measures were small and statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: The addition of passive joint mobilisation of shoulder region joints is not more effective than advice and exercise alone for shoulder pain and stiffness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN 12605000080628.


Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Terapia Pasiva Continua de Movimiento , Lesiones del Hombro , Dolor de Hombro/rehabilitación , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Articulación del Hombro/patología , Método Simple Ciego , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA