Five-year Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Hypoparathyroidism Treated With and Without rhPTH(1-84).

CONTEXT: Chronic hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT) is conventionally managed with oral calcium and active vitamin D. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-84) (rhPTH[1-84]) is a therapy targeting the pathophysiology of HypoPT by replacing parathyroid hormone. OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with chronic HypoPT receiving or not receiving rhPTH(1-84) during a 5-year period. DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective analysis of patients with chronic HypoPT treated with or without rhPTH(1-84). PATIENTS: Sixty-nine patients with chronic HypoPT from 4 open-label, long-term trials (NCT00732615, NCT01268098, NCT01297309, and NCT02910466) composed the rhPTH(1-84) cohort and 53 patients with chronic HypoPT not receiving rhPTH(1-84) from the Geisinger Healthcare Database (01/2004-06/2016) composed the historical control cohort. INTERVENTIONS: The rhPTH(1-84) cohort (N = 69) received rhPTH(1-84) therapy; the historical control cohort (N = 53) did not receive rhPTH(1-84). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in eGFR from baseline during a 5-year follow-up were examined in multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: At baseline, demographic characteristics and eGFR were similar between cohorts, though the proportions with diabetes and cardiac disorders were lower in the rhPTH(1-84) cohort. At the end of follow-up, mean eGFR increased by 2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the rhPTH(1-84) cohort, while mean eGFR fell by 8.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the control cohort. In the adjusted model, the difference in the annual eGFR change between the rhPTH(1-84) cohort and the control cohort was 1.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Estimated glomerular filtration rate was preserved for over 5 years among patients with chronic HypoPT receiving rhPTH(1-84) treatment, contrasting with an eGFR decline among those not receiving rhPTH(1-84).

Identifying a subpopulation with higher likelihoods of early response to treatment in a heterogeneous rare disease: a post hoc study of response to teduglutide for short bowel syndrome.

PURPOSE: Teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-2 analog, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing parenteral support (PS) among patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). This study aims to identify a subpopulation of SBS-IF patients for whom teduglutide has an especially pronounced effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were from a 24-week, Phase III trial (Study of Teduglutide Effectiveness in Parenteral Nutrition-Dependent SBS Subjects; NCT00798967) that randomized SBS-IF patients with PS dependency to receive teduglutide (n=43) or placebo (n=43). Two prediction models (1 for each arm) were developed for response, defined as 20% reduction in weekly PS at Weeks 20 and 24. Potential predictors included demographics, disease characteristics, and concomitant medications. Patients were then ranked based on the effect score, an individualized predicted response rate difference with teduglutide versus placebo. A subpopulation of patients with a pronounced benefit from teduglutide versus placebo was identified. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients included versus those not included in the subpopulation. RESULTS: Six predictors of response to teduglutide were selected: older age, volvulus as the cause of major intestinal resection, baseline PS volume >6 L per week, longer time since start of PS dependency, absence of ileocecal valve, and lower percentage of colon remaining. Higher percentage of colon remaining and volvulus were the selected predictors for response to placebo. A subpopulation of patients more likely to respond to teduglutide was identified as those with the top 60% effect scores. The difference in response rate between teduglutide and placebo was 62% in the subpopulation, which was substantially higher than the difference of 33% in the overall population. Mean PS day reduction was also significantly higher for teduglutide compared to placebo in the subpopulation. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment characteristics as predictors of response to teduglutide versus placebo within 24 weeks were identifiable in the clinical trial population of SBS-IF patients.

Access to diagnosis, treatment, and supportive services among pharmacotherapy-treated children/adolescents with ADHD in Europe: data from the Caregiver Perspective on Pediatric ADHD survey.

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood psychiatric disorders and negatively impacts caregivers' lives. Factors including barriers to accessing care, dissatisfaction with support services, and lack of caregiver resources may contribute to this. OBJECTIVES: To report caregivers' experiences of ADHD diagnosis, behavioral therapy (BT), and supportive care for children/adolescents with ADHD. METHODS: The Caregiver Perspective on Pediatric ADHD (CAPPA) survey included caregivers of children/adolescents (6-17 years) from ten European countries who were currently receiving/had received ADHD pharmacotherapy in the previous 6 months. Caregivers reported experiences of obtaining an ADHD diagnosis, access to BT, availability of caregiver resources, and level of health care/school support. Pan-EU and country-specific descriptive statistics are reported; responses were compared across countries. RESULTS: Of 3,616 caregivers, 66% were female. Mean age of children/adolescents was 11.5 years; 80% were male. Mean time from the first doctor visit to diagnosis was 10.8 (95% confidence interval 10.2, 11.3) months; 31% of caregivers reported the greatest degrees of difficulty in obtaining an ADHD diagnosis; 44% of children/adolescents did not receive BT. Forty-seven percent of caregivers reported that sufficient resources were available, 44% were "very satisfied"/"satisfied" with medical care, and 50% found health care providers "very supportive"/"somewhat supportive". Mainstream schools were attended by 82% of children/adolescents. Of those, 67% of caregivers thought schools could help more with the child/adolescent's ADHD and 48% received extra help/special arrangement. Results varied significantly between countries (P<0.001, all parameters). CONCLUSION: Almost a third of caregivers reported a high degree of difficulty in obtaining an ADHD diagnosis for their child/adolescent, less than half felt that sufficient resources were available, and gaps in support from health care providers/schools were identified. Findings underscore the need to improve access to diagnosis and provision of supportive services to enable better standards of care, and potentially reduce the impact of child/adolescent ADHD on caregivers' lives.

Caregiver perspective on pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: medication satisfaction and symptom control.

The caregiver perspective on pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) study (CAPPA) was a web-based, cross-sectional survey of caregivers of children and adolescents (6-17 years of age) with ADHD and was conducted in 10 European countries. CAPPA included caregiver assessments of global medication satisfaction, global symptom control, and satisfaction with ADHD medication attributes. Overall, 2,326 caregiver responses indicated that their child or adolescent was currently receiving ADHD medication and completed the "off medication" assessment required for inclusion in the present analyses. Responses to the single-item global medication satisfaction question indicated that 88% were satisfied (moderately satisfied to very satisfied) with current medication and 18% were "very satisfied" on the single-item question. Responses to the single-item global symptom control question indicated that 47% and 19% of caregivers considered their child or adolescent's symptoms to be "controlled" or "very well controlled", respectively. Significant variations in response to the questions of medication satisfaction and symptom control were observed between countries. The correlation between the global medication satisfaction and global symptom control questions was 0.677 (P<0.001). Global medication satisfaction was significantly correlated (P<0.001) with all assessed medication attributes, with the highest correlations observed for symptom control (r=0.601) and effect duration (r=0.449). Correlations of medication attributes with global symptom control were generally lower than with global medication satisfaction but were all statistically significant (P<0.001). CAPPA medication satisfaction and symptom control were also significantly correlated (P<0.001) with symptom control as based on the ADHD-Rating Scale-IV symptom score and the number of bad days per month when on medication. In conclusion, caregiver responses in this European sample suggest that current treatment could potentially be improved. The observed correlations of global medication satisfaction with global symptom control and other CAPPA assessments, including medication attributes, provide support for the inter-connectivity of the medication satisfaction and symptom control.

Factors associated with caregiver burden among pharmacotherapy-treated children/adolescents with ADHD in the Caregiver Perspective on Pediatric ADHD survey in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Burden on caregivers of children/adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is multidimensional, but incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: To analyze caregiver burden across the concepts of work, social/family life, and parental worry/stress, in relation to selected contributing factors. METHODS: The online Caregiver Perspective on Pediatric ADHD survey was fielded in ten European countries. Analysis included children/adolescents (6-17 years) who were receiving/had received ADHD pharmacotherapy in the previous 6 months. Caregivers recorded their child's/adolescent's symptoms "on"/"off" medication (ie, when the caregiver reported that the child/adolescent forgot/chose not to take medication, before the onset of medication effect, or medication worn off). Effects of ADHD severity, comorbidities, and medication adherence on each burden outcome were assessed (multiple regression models). RESULTS: In total, 2,326 caregivers were included (children/adolescents' mean age: 11.5 years, 80% male). Caregivers reported missed/altered work, avoiding social activity, increased parental worry/stress, and strain on family life, despite using ADHD pharmacotherapy. Child/adolescent comorbidities and ADHD severity were significantly related to all burden concepts measured; the strongest comorbidity associations were with altered work (odds ratios [ORs] =1.68 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.33, 2.12], 1.87 [1.37, 2.54], 3.47 [2.51, 4.78] for 1, 2, 3+ comorbidities, respectively) and planning the day around the child/adolescent (OR =1.42 [95% CI 1.17, 1.72], 1.73 [1.33, 2.15], 2.65 [1.99, 3.53]); the strongest severity associations were: quitting a job (OR =1.41 [95% CI 1.26, 1.59]) and planning a day around the child/adolescent (OR =1.26 [95% CI 1.20, 1.32]). Increased medication adherence was most associated with reducing the caregiver burden for altered work (OR =0.57 [95% CI 0.45, 0.72]), worrying about how they are being perceived as a parent (OR =0.68 [0.56, 0.83]), and avoiding social activity (OR =0.56 [0.45, 0.68]), but not family or stress burden. CONCLUSION: Burdens related to work, social activity, family life, and parental worry/stress were experienced by the caregivers of children/adolescents with ADHD, despite using ADHD pharmacotherapy. Better understanding of clinical/treatment characteristics most associated with the components of caregiver burden may help improve ADHD management and may ease caregiver burden.

Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US.

PURPOSE: Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months. METHODS: Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data. RESULTS: Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.

Cost effectiveness of guanfacine extended-release versus atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: application of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison.

BACKGROUND: About 7% of children and adolescents are diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the US. Patients with ADHD who are intolerant of or do not have an optimal response to stimulants often use non-stimulants as alternative therapies. Guanfacine extended-release (GXR) and atomoxetine (ATX) are the only non-stimulants approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for once-daily use in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD in the US. ATX has been on the market since 2002 while GXR was recently approved in 2009. To date, there is no comparative effectiveness or cost-effectiveness study comparing the two drugs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of GXR versus ATX for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents, using the comparative efficacy results from a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). METHODS: The MAIC method was used to compare the efficacy between GXR (target dose and lower doses) and ATX (target dose) in the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. Individual patients in the GXR trials were weighted such that the summary baseline characteristics and the efficacy of the placebo arm of the GXR trials matched exactly with those from published ATX trials. After weighting, the efficacy (i.e. change in the ADHD rating scale, fourth edition [ADHD-RS-IV] total score from baseline) was compared between each GXR dosing group and the ATX group. The results from the MAIC analyses were used to populate a 1-year Markov model that is used to compare the cost effectiveness of GXR versus ATX from a US third-party payer perspective. Effectiveness outcomes for each treatment group were estimated as the proportion of responders, defined as patients with ≥25% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline, and average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities associated with response/non-response and disutilities due to adverse events were applied in the model. Costs included drug and medical service costs and were inflated to 2011 US dollars ($US). Incremental cost/QALY and incremental cost/responder were estimated. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying all model parameters, including costs, utilities, and response rate. RESULTS: The target dose of GXR was 0.12 mg/kg/day. In match-adjusted populations with balanced baseline characteristics, patients receiving GXR at the dose of 0.09-0.12(p = 0.0016) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] and 0.075-0.09 mg/kg/day (p = 0.0248) had better efficacy, while those receiving GXR at the dose of 0.046-0.075 mg/kg/day had comparable efficacy (p = 0.0699), compared with patients receiving ATX at the target dose of 1.2 mg/kg/day. In the base case of the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), GXR had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $US10 637/QALY and $US853/responder, compared with ATX (incremental costs: $US74; incremental effectiveness: 0.007 QALYs and 86 responders per 1000 patients treated). Results of all univariate sensitivity analyses showed that the model results were robust to changes in model inputs. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first application of the novel comparative efficacy method of MAIC to a CEA model. The MAIC results indicate that GXR (0.075-0.12 mg/kg/day) was more effective than ATX (1.2 mg/kg/day) in the trial population. The CEA results indicate that GXR is cost effective compared with ATX for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.

Achieving glycemic goal with initial versus sequential combination therapy using metformin and pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare glycemic goal achievement (HbA(1c) < 7%) in type 2 diabetes patients receiving initial metformin plus pioglitazone combination therapy and initial metformin monotherapy augmented with pioglitazone in a cohort follow-up study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult patients were identified from the Ingenix Impact database (01/01/99-03/31/07). Qualified patients had a baseline HbA(1c) ≥ 7%; a second laboratory value within 9 months; no other anti-diabetic prescriptions 6 months before or 30 days after treatment initiation; and continuous enrollment during baseline. The index date was the date on which the second medication was initiated. Goal achievement was compared independently at 6, 12 and 18 months using a chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to control for baseline differences. Last observation carried forward was used to impute missing HbA(1c) values. Sub-group analysis was conducted on patients with baseline HbA(1c) values between 7% and 9%, and >9%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients achieving glycemic goal at each specified time point. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients received initial combination therapy and 347 patients received sequential therapy. A greater proportion of initial combination patients achieved the glycemic goal compared to sequential patients at months 6, 12 and 18 (66.5 vs. 49.6%; 65.9 vs. 48.1%; 65.9 vs. 48.4%, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). Logistic regression confirmed these findings (odds ratios [OR]: 3.18-3.31). Sub-group analysis showed a more pronounced advantage for aggressive initial combination treatment among patients with HbA(1c) > 9% (OR: 5.39-6.04) than among patients with HbA(1c) between 7% and 9% (OR: 2.28-2.79). CONCLUSIONS: Initial combination therapy patients are more likely to achieve glycemic control than sequential therapy patients, especially for patients with baseline HbA(1c) > 9%. This study is limited by the relatively small sample size and the frequency of HbA(1c) reporting. Future research could examine goal achievement using a larger sample and more complete laboratory data to confirm these findings.

Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: a managed care perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part III.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). METHODS: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices-Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. RESULTS: The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. CONCLUSION: Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.