Incorporating low haemoglobin into a risk prediction model for conversion in minimally invasive gynaecologic oncology surgeries.

BACKGROUND: A well-known complication of laparoscopic management of gynaecologic masses and cancers is the need to perform an intraoperative conversion to laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to identify novel patient risk factors for conversion from minimally invasive to open surgeries for gynaecologic oncology operations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1356 patients ≥18 years of age who underwent surgeries for gynaecologic masses or malignancies between February 2015 and May 2020 at a single academic medical centre. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the effects of older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status, and lower preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) on odds of converting from minimally invasive to open surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the discriminatory ability of a risk prediction model for conversion. RESULTS: A total of 704 planned minimally invasive surgeries were included with an overall conversion rate of 6.1% (43/704). Preoperative Hb was lowest for conversion cases, compared to minimally invasive and open cases (11.6 ± 1.9 vs 12.8 ± 1.5 vs 11.8 ± 1.9 g/dL, p<.001). Patients with preoperative Hb <10 g/dL had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3.94 (CI: 1.65-9.41, p=.002) for conversion while patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had an adjusted OR of 2.86 (CI: 1.50-5.46, p=.001) for conversion. ROC curve analysis using predictive variables of age >50 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, ASA physical status >2, and preoperative haemoglobin <10 g/dL resulted in an area under the ROC curve of 0.71. Patients with 2 or more risk factors were at highest risk of requiring an intraoperative conversion (12.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Lower preoperative haemoglobin is a novel risk factor for conversion from minimally invasive to open gynaecologic oncology surgeries and stratifying patients based on conversion risk may be helpful for preoperative planning.

Minimally invasive surgery for management of gynaecologic masses (masses that affect the female reproductive organs) is often preferred over more invasive surgery, because it involves smaller surgical incisions and can have overall better recovery time. However, one unwanted complication of minimally invasive surgery is the need to unexpectedly convert the surgery to an open surgery, which entails a larger incision and is a higher risk procedure. In our study, we aimed to find patient characteristics that are associated with higher risk of converting a minimally invasive surgery to an open surgery. Our study identified that lower levels of preoperative haemoglobin, the protein that carries oxygen within red blood cells, is correlated with higher risk for conversion. This new risk factor was used with other known risk factors, including having higher age, higher body mass index, and higher baseline medical complexity to create a model to help surgical teams identify high risk patients for conversion. This model may be useful for surgical planning before and during the operation to improve patient outcomes.

The past, present, and future of opioid prescribing: Perioperative opioid use in gynecologic oncology patients after laparotomy at a single institution from 2012 to 2021.

Objective: To describe the evolution of perioperative opioid management in gynecologic oncology patients after open surgeries and determine current opioid over-prescription rates. Methods: Part one of this two-part study was a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent laparotomy by a gynecologic oncologist from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2021, comparing changes in clinical characteristics, pain management and discharge opioid prescription sizes between fiscal year 2012 (FY2012) and 2020 (FY2020). In part two, we prospectively surveyed patients after laparotomy in 2021 to determine opioid use after hospital discharge. Results: 1187 patients were included in the chart review. Demographic and surgical characteristics remained stable from FY2012 to FY2020 with differences notable for increased rates of interval cytoreductive surgeries for advanced ovarian cancer and decreased rates of full lymph node dissection. Median inpatient opioid use decreased by 62 % from FY2012 to FY2020. Median discharge opioid prescription size was 675 oral morphine equivalents (OME) per patient in FY2012 and decreased by 77.7 % to 150 OME in FY2020. Of 95 surveyed patients in 2021, median self-reported opioid use after discharge was 22.5 OME. Patients had an excess of opioids equivalent to 1331 doses of 5-milligram oxycodone tablets per 100 patients. Conclusion: Inpatient opioid use in our gynecologic oncology open surgical patients and post-discharge opioid prescription size significantly decreased over the last decade. Despite this progress, our current prescribing patterns continue to significantly overestimate patients' actual opioid use after hospital discharge. Individualized point of care tools are needed to determine an appropriate opioid prescription size.

Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for treating hypotension during general anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised, crossover, feasibility, and pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative complications. The use of vasopressors is often required to correct hypotension but the best vasopressor is unknown. METHODS: A multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover, feasibility and pilot trial was conducted across five hospitals in California. Phenylephrine (PE) vs norepinephrine (NE) infusion as the first-line vasopressor in patients under general anaesthesia alternated monthly at each hospital for 6 months. The primary endpoint was first-line vasopressor administration compliance of 80% or higher. Secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day mortality, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), hospital length of stay, and rehospitalisation within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 3626 patients were enrolled over 6 months; 1809 patients were randomised in the NE group, 1817 in the PE group. Overall, 88.2% received the assigned first-line vasopressor. No drug infiltrations requiring treatment were reported in either group. Patients were median 63 yr old, 50% female, and 58% white. Randomisation in the NE group vs PE group did not reduce readmission within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio=0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.39), 30-day mortality (1.01; 0.48-2.09), AKI (1.1; 0.92-1.31), or MINS (1.63; 0.84-3.16). CONCLUSIONS: A large and diverse population undergoing major surgery under general anaesthesia was successfully enrolled and randomised to receive NE or PE infusion. This pilot and feasibility trial was not powered for adverse postoperative outcomes and a follow-up multicentre effectiveness trial is planned. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04789330 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Intraoperative Use of Albumin in Major Noncardiac Surgery: Incidence, Variability, and Association With Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of albumin use during major surgery is unknown, and a dearth of evidence governing its use in major noncardiac surgery has long precluded its standardization in clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate institutional variation in albumin use among medical centers in the United States during major noncardiac surgery and explore the association of intraoperative albumin administration with important postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The study is an observational retrospective cohort analysis performed among 54 U.S. hospitals in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group and includes adult patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia between January 2014 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of albumin administration. Secondary endpoints are acute kidney injury (AKI), net-positive fluid balance, pulmonary complications, and 30-day mortality. Albumin-exposed and albumin-unexposed cases were compared within a propensity score-matched cohort to evaluate associations of albumin use with outcomes. RESULTS: Among 614,215 major surgeries, predominantly iso-oncotic albumin was administered in 15.3% of cases and featured significant inter-institutional variability in use patterns. Cases receiving intraoperative albumin involved patients of higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and featured larger infused crystalloid volumes, greater blood loss, and vasopressor use. Overall, albumin was most often administered at high-volume surgery centers with academic affiliation, and within a propensity score-matched cohort (n=153,218), the use of albumin was associated with AKI (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.28, P <0.001), severe AKI (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34-1.56, P <0.001), net-positive fluid balance (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20, P <0.001), pulmonary complications (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.30-1.86, P <0.001), and 30-day all-cause mortality (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.26-1.49, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous albumin is commonly administered among noncardiac surgeries with significant inter-institutional variability in use in the United States. Albumin administration was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

Fluids, vasopressors, and acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery between 2015 and 2019: a multicentre retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Practice patterns related to intraoperative fluid administration and vasopressor use have potentially evolved over recent years. However, the extent of such changes and their association with perioperative outcomes, such as the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), have not been studied. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of major abdominal surgeries in adults across 26 US hospitals between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition (KDIGO) using only serum creatinine criteria. Univariable linear predictive additive models were used to describe the dose-dependent risk of AKI given fluid administration or vasopressor use. RESULTS: Over the study period, we observed a decrease in the volume of crystalloid administered, a decrease in the proportion of patients receiving more than 10 ml kg-1 h-1 of crystalloid, an increase in the amount of norepinephrine equivalents administered, and a decreased duration of hypotension. The incidence of AKI increased between 2016 and 2019. An increase of crystalloid administration from 1 to 10 ml kg-1 h-1 was associated with a 58% decreased risk of AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite decreased duration of hypotension during the study period, decreased fluid administration and increased vasopressor use were associated with increased incidence of AKI. Crystalloid administration below 10 ml kg-1 h-1 was associated with an increased risk of AKI. Although no causality can be concluded, these data suggest that prevention and treatment of hypotension during abdominal surgery with liberal use of vasopressors at the expense of fluid administration is associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI.

Rethinking Disparities in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy: Identifying Drivers of Disparate Surgical Approach to Myomectomy Between African American and White Women.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify drivers of disparities among patients undergoing surgical management of myomas when stratified by self-identified patient race. DESIGN: This is a retrospective institutional review board-approved chart review of all patients who underwent a myomectomy at a large academic center. Surgical approach to myomectomy was classified as abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic. Myoma burden was quantified preoperatively using uterine volume, intraoperatively by number of myomas listed on operative report, and postoperatively by myoma weight from pathology reports. SETTING: A large tertiary care hospital containing a comprehensive myoma treatment center. PATIENTS: A total of 265 white patients and 121 African American patients who underwent a myomectomy between January 2012 and October 2018 were included in the study population. INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomy. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted myomectomy were classified as minimally invasive myomectomy. Multivariable logistic regression models and a propensity score matching algorithm were used to match African American (AA) women and white women for myoma burden. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 386 women were included in the study. AA women (31%; n = 121) had higher myoma burden than white women by preoperative imaging (AA: 36% with 3 or more myomas; white: 19% with 3 or more myomas; p <.01) and operative report (>8 AA: 31% vs white 13%; p <.01). Despite this, AA women underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at similar rates as compared with white women when adjusted for myoma burden, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, hypertension, and surgical indication (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.2 myomas; p <.01). Sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching found similar results. CONCLUSION: In this population, AA women had a higher myoma burden than white women. When matched for myoma burden, however, there was no statistically significant difference between rates of minimally invasive myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy. This finding was consistent when controlling for myoma burden measured by preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative methods of measurement. Further studies are needed to better characterize this disparity at other hospitals and to investigate ways to increase access and equity among patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy.

International multicentre observational study to evaluate the association between perioperative red blood cell transfusions and 1-year mortality after major cancer surgery (ARCA-1): study design, statistical analysis plan and study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Blood transfusion is still common in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. Blood transfusion can be associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient -1 (ARCA-1) aims to assess in a large cohort of patients the current incidence, pattern of practice and associations between perioperative blood transfusions and 1-year survival in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ARCA-1 is a prospective international multicentre observational study that will include adult patients scheduled to have major cancer surgical procedures with the intention to cure, and an overnight planned hospital admission. The study will be opened for 1 year for enrolment (7 January 2020-7 February 2021). Each centre will enrol patients for 30 days. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary endpoints are rate of perioperative blood product use, cancer-specific mortality at 1 year and PFSs and 30-day morbidity and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04491409.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Decreases Postoperative Length of Stay and Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze differences in length of stay, opioid use, and other perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion who received either liposomal bupivacaine (LB) or epidural analgesia. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy with urinary diversion from 2015-2019 in the early recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Patients received either LB or epidural catheter analgesia for post-operative pain control. LB was injected at the time of fascial closure to provide up to 72 hours of local analgesia. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay. Secondary outcomes were post-operative opioid use, time to solid food, time to ambulation, and direct hospitalization costs. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine associations between analgesia type and discharge. RESULTS: LB use was independently associated with shorter post-operative length of stay compared to epidural use (median (IQR) 4.9 days (3.9-5.8) vs 5.9 days (4.9-7.9), P<.001), less total opioid use (mean 188.3 vs 612.2 OME, P <.001), earlier diet advancement (mean 1.6 vs 2.4 days, P <.001), and decreased overall direct costs ($23,188 vs $29,628, P <.001). 45% of patients who received LB were opioid-free after surgery, none in the epidural group. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, LB use was independently associated with earlier discharge (HR 2.1, IQR 1.0-4.5). CONCLUSION: Use of LB in open radical cystectomy is associated with reduced LOS, less opioid exposure, and earlier diet advancement.

Using provider-focused education toolkits can aid enhanced recovery programs to further reduce patient exposure to opioids.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based perioperative analgesia is an important tactic for reducing patient exposure to opioids in the perioperative period and potentially preventing new persistent opioid use. STUDY DESIGN: We assessed the impact of a multifaceted optimal analgesia program implemented in the setting of a mature surgical pathway program at an academic medical center. Using existing multidisciplinary workgroups established for continuous process improvement in three surgical pathway areas ((colorectal, gynecology, and urologic oncology (cystectomy)), we developed an educational toolkit focused on implementation strategies for multimodal analgesia and non-pharmacologic approaches for managing pain with the goal of reducing opioid exposure in hospitalized patients. We analyzed prospectively collected data from pathway patients before dissemination of the toolkit (July 2016-June 2017; n = 869) and after (July 2017-June 2018; n = 838). We evaluated the association between program implementation and use of oral morphine equivalents (OME), average pain scores, time to first ambulation after surgery, urinary catheter duration, time to solid food after surgery, length of stay, discharge opioid prescriptions, and readmission. RESULTS: Multivariate regression demonstrated that the program was associated with significant decreases in intraoperative OME (14.5 ± 2.4 mEQ (milliequivalents) reduction; p < 0.0001), day before discharge OME (18 ± 6.5 mEQ reduction; p < 0.005), day of discharge OME (9.6 ± 3.28 mEQ reduction; p < 0.003), and discharge prescription OME (156 ± 22 mEq reduction; p < 0.001). Reduction in OME was associated with earlier resumption of solid food (0.58 ± 0.15 days reduction; p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Our multifaceted optimal analgesia program to manage perioperative pain in the hospital was effective and further improved analgesia in the setting of a mature enhanced recovery program.

Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion for post-operative analgesia after major abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared continuous epidural infusion (CEI) against programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery. It has not been established whether the modality of epidural medication administration affects postoperative pain and other patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of PIEB against CEI in postoperative pain management after a broad range of surgeries with abdominal incisions, all managed in the context of an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Postoperative acute care. PATIENTS: 120 patients scheduled for major surgery involving abdominal incisions with planned postoperative epidural analgesia were enrolled as study participants. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received a standardized epidural solution containing ropivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 2 µg/ml. The CEI group received this solution as a continuous infusion, while the PIEB group received this solution as programmed intermittent boluses. MEASUREMENTS: The primary study outcome was the total local anesthetic used over the first 24 h post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included pain severity, pain interference, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary outcome of total amount of local anesthetic administered in the first 24-hour postoperative period (PIEB: 123 mg [Interquartile Range (IQR): 114-136]; CEI: 126 mg [IQR: 120-134]). There were also no differences in average pain severity, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, number of PCEA requests and incidence of adverse events at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that within the context of an established ERAS program, PIEB and CEI modes of epidural analgesia can be equally efficacious and safe in providing postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery.

Medicaid and Medicare payer status are associated with worse surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative outcomes by primary payer status for patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent elective surgery for gynecologic malignancies between 2015 and 2019. Patient outcomes were compared by payer status using logistic regression. Sociodemographic and clinical covariates were selected a priori and included age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, body mass index, smoking status, malignancy site, surgery type, race, estimated income, marital status, and medical interpreter requirement. RESULTS: A total of 1894 patients comprised the study sample. In the multivariate model, compared to patients with private insurance, Medicaid and Medicare patients were more likely to mobilize >24 h after surgery (OR 1.9, p < 0.05 and OR 3.2, p < 0.001, respectively), to require ICU admission (OR 4.0, p < 0.05 and OR 5.0, p < 0.05, respectively), and to have longer lengths of stay (OR 1.8, p < 0.05 and OR 2.2, p < 0.001, respectively). Medicaid patients were also more likely to have higher total hospital costs (OR 1.7, p < 0.05). Payer status was not associated with postoperative pain, postoperative opiate use, or 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid and Medicare payer status are associated with worse postoperative outcomes in patients with gynecologic malignancies. The poor outcomes of Medicaid patients - a cohort defined by limited income - are noteworthy. The etiology is likely multifactorial, arising from a complex interplay of factors ranging from system issues such as access to care to the unique health status of a population bearing a high burden of disease and socioeconomic adversity.

International multicenter observational study on assessment of ventilatory management during general anaesthesia for robotic surgery and its effects on postoperative pulmonary complication (AVATaR): study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as an alternative minimally invasive surgical option. Despite its growing applicability, the frequent need for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position could significantly affect respiratory mechanics during RAS. AVATaR is an international multicenter observational study aiming to assess the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), to characterise current practices of mechanical ventilation (MV) and to evaluate a possible association between ventilatory parameters and PPC in patients undergoing RAS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: AVATaR is an observational study of surgical patients undergoing MV for general anaesthesia for RAS. The primary outcome is the incidence of PPC during the first five postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include practice of MV, effect of surgical positioning on MV, effect of MV on clinical outcome and intraoperative complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02989415; Pre-results.

Patient-reported outcomes 6 months after enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been established as perioperative strategies associated with improved outcomes. However, intermediate and long-term patient-reported outcome data for patients undergoing ERAS interventions remain limited. We utilized an automated telephone survey 6 months post-colorectal surgery from patients who participated in an ERAS program to determine 6-month patient-reported outcomes and associated predictive factors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study, using an automated telephone survey and researcher-administered telephone questionnaire 6 months after patients underwent abdominal colorectal surgery. Six-month significant outcomes were defined by persistent pain, hospital readmission, and patient satisfaction. Patients reporting these outcome variables were compared with patients who met none of these criteria. Additionally, analysis was performed to determine differences between patients that did and did not respond to the 6-month survey. A chi-square test was used to determine any relationship for categorical variables, a two independent sample t test for length of procedure/stay, and a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for pain scores. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four of 324 patients contacted 6 months after surgery completed the automated telephone survey (47.53%). There was no statistical difference between patient populations completing and not completing the survey. Hospital 6-month readmission was associated with patients with a diagnosis of cancer (P = .049) and with a longer mean length of index procedure (282 vs. 206 minutes, P = .006). Median 6-month pain scores were higher for patients that underwent an open procedure compared to laparoscopic (Z = - 2.06, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term benefits of an ERAS program were mostly confirmed. Longer procedure time and patients with cancer correlated with an increased likelihood of hospital 6-month readmission, suggesting that perioperative outcomes in complex cancer patients need to be evaluated over a longer time frame. In addition, invasiveness of procedure continues to have a significant effect on pain scores even 6 months later.

Enhanced recovery after surgery-Preoperative fasting and glucose loading-A review.

In this review, we explore the rationale and history behind the practice of preoperative fasting in elective surgery including the gradual move toward longer fasting and the more recent change in direction of practice. Gastric emptying physiology and the metabolic effects of prolonged fasting and carbohydrate loading are examined. Most recent guidelines related to these topics are discussed and practical recommendations for implementing these guidelines are suggested.

High-Dose Interleukin-2: Evaluation of a Standardized Order Set for Biotherapy in an Intensive Care Unit
.

BACKGROUND: Life-threatening toxicity may result from administration of high-dose (HD) interleukin-2 (IL-2). Patients receiving HD IL-2 treatment often experience severe adverse side effects, which result in the interruption of treatment. 
. OBJECTIVES: A standardized order set (SOS) was developed for patients with melanoma or renal cell carcinoma receiving HD IL-2. The aims of the study were to determine compliance of clinicians to the SOS, report the completed doses and major side effects of HD IL-2, and document the satisfaction level of clinicians.
. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 40 health records of patients with melanoma or renal cell carcinoma who were treated with HD IL-2 was conducted to determine compliance to the SOS. Staff satisfaction with the SOS was surveyed.
. FINDINGS: The SOS was successfully implemented with a provider compliance rate of 90%. Cardiovascular side effects were the most common. Clinicians found the SOS very satisfactory or superior in guiding care and treatment of side effects.

Successful implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite international data indicating that Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, which combine evidence-based perioperative strategies, expedite recovery after surgery, few centers have successfully adopted this approach within the U.S. We describe the implementation and efficacy of an ERAS program for colorectal abdominal surgery in a tertiary teaching center in the U.S. METHODS: We used a multi-modal and continuously evolving approach to implement an ERAS program among all patients undergoing colorectal abdominal surgery at a single hospital at the University of California, San Francisco. 279 patients who participated in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery program were compared to 245 previous patients who underwent surgery prior to implementation of the program. Primary end points were length of stay and readmission rates. Secondary end points included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of urinary catheterization, and time to first solid meal. RESULTS: ERAS decreased both median total hospital length of stay (6.4 to 4.4 days) and post-procedure length of stay (6.0 to 4.1 days). 30-day all-cause readmission rates decreased from 21 to 9.4 %. Pain scores improved on postoperative day 0 (3.2 to 2.1) and day 1 (3.2 to 2.6) despite decreased opioid. Median time to first solid meal decreased from 4.7 to 2.7 days and duration of urinary catheterization decreased from 74 to 46 h. Similar improvements were observed in all other secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that a multidisciplinary, iterative, team-based approach is associated with a reduction in hospital stay and an acceleration in recovery without increasing readmission rates.

Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Improving Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway facilitates early recovery and discharge in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study. Consecutive gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgery between July 1 and November 5, 2014, were treated on an enhanced recovery pathway. Enhanced recovery pathway components included patient education, multimodal analgesia, opioid minimization, nausea prophylaxis as well as early catheter removal, ambulation, and feeding. Cases were matched in a one-to-two ratio with historical control patients on the basis of surgery type and age. Primary endpoints were length of hospital stay, rates of discharge by noon, 30-day hospital readmission rates, and hospital costs. RESULTS: There were 165 patients included in the final cohort, 55 of whom were enhanced recovery pathway patients. Enhanced recovery patients were more likely to be discharged on postoperative day 1 compared with patients in the control group (91% compared with 60%, P<.001, odds ratio 6.7, 95% confidence interval 2.46-18.04). Fifteen percent of enhanced recovery patients achieved discharge by noon compared with 4% of historical control patients (P=.03). Postoperative pain scores decreased (2.6 compared with 3.12, P=.03) despite a 30% reduction in opioid use. Average total hospital costs were decreased by 12% in the enhanced recovery group ($13,771 compared with $15,649, P=.01). Readmission rates, mortality, and reoperation rates did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: An enhanced recovery pathway in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology minimally invasive surgery is associated with significant improvements in recovery time, decreased pain despite reduced opioid use, and overall lower hospital costs.