Identify potential clinical significance of long noncoding RNA forkhead box P4 antisense RNA 1 in patients with early stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Previous studies have shown that forkhead box P4 antisense RNA 1 (FOXP4-AS1) is dysregulated in tumor tissues and can serve as a prognostic indicator for multiple cancers. However, the clinical significance of FOXP4-AS1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to recognize the possible clinical significance of long noncoding RNA FOXP4-AS1 in patients with early stage PDAC. A total of 112 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PDAC cohort, receiving RNA sequencing, were involved in the study. Survival analysis, functional mechanism, and potential small molecule drugs of target therapy of FOXP4-AS1 were performed in this study. Survival analysis in TCGA PDAC cohort suggested that patients with high FOXP4-AS1 expression had significantly augmented possibility of death than in PDAC patients with lower FOXP4-AS1 expression (adjusted P = .008; adjusted HR = 2.143, 95% CI = 1.221-3.760). In this study, a genome-wide RNA sequencing dataset was used to identify 927 genes co-expressing with FOXP4-AS1 in PDAC tumor tissues. A total of 676 differentially expressed genes were identified between different FOXP4-AS1 expression groups. Functional enrichment analysis of these genes and gene set enrichment analysis for PDAC genome-wide RNA sequencing dataset was done. We have found that FOXP4-AS1 may function in PDAC by participating in biological processes and pathways including oxidative phosphorylation, tricarboxylic acid cycle, classical tumor-related pathways such as NF-kappaB as well as Janus kinase/signal transducers in addition to activators of transcription, cell proliferation, and adhesion. In addition, we also screened two potential targeted therapeutic small molecule drugs (dimenhydrinate and metanephrine) for FOXP4-AS1 in PDAC. In conclusion, our present study demonstrated that higher expression of FOXP4-AS1 in PDAC tumor tissues were related with an inferior medical outcome. Through multiple genome-wide approaches, we identified the potential molecular mechanisms of FOXP4-AS1 in PDAC and two targeted therapeutic drugs for it.

Different radiation treatment in esophageal carcinoma: a clinical comparative study.

PURPOSE: Conventional fractionation radiation therapy (CFRT), 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), are always applied to treat esophageal carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to analyse the therapeutic results and acute radiation side effects of radiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: From March 2008 to May 2010, 117 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated at our hospital were included into this study. Thirty-eight (32.48%?) patients were treated with CFRT, 32 with 3DCRT and 47 with IMRT. The data were retrospectively collected and analysed. RESULTS: The objective response rates (complete/CR plus partial response/PR) in the CFRT group, 3DCRT group and IMRT group were 96.88, 92.11, and 91.49%, respectively (p=0.617). Furthermore, the one-year survival of the 3 groups was 77.9, 87.5 and 86.7%, respectively (p=0.193), and the 2-year survival 38.6, 55.1 and 57.7%, respectively (p=0.211). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis in the IMRT+3DCRT groups was significantly higher compared with the CFRT group (p=0.012) and the incidence of acute radiation- induced pneumonitis, bronchitis and myelosuppression in the IMRT+3DCRT groups were lower compared with the CFRT group (p<0.01, p=0.028, and p=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both IMRT and 3DCRT methods can improve the clinical therapeutic outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma and decrease the incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis, radiation bronchitis and bone marrow suppression.