Visceral Metastasis: A Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the visceral metastasis as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with spinal metastases through an exploratory meta-analysis. METHODS: Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies from 2000-2016. The effect estimates for the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled with a random- or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: In total, 18 eligible studies were retrieved with 5468 participants from nine countries. The overall pooled effect size for HR and RR was 1.50 and 3.79, respectively, which was proved to be statistically significant. In the subgroup of prostate cancer (PCa) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), statistical significance and marginal statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.35-2.29) and (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.99-2.48), respectively. However, in the subgroup of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and renal cancer, statistical significance was not achieved (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.75-1.83, Z = 0.70, P = 0.486). The results did not show any evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that visceral metastasis was a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases as a whole. Interestingly, the onset of visceral metastases differentially impacted the survival in different primary tumors. Therefore, the prognostic value of visceral metastasis might be related to the type of primary tumor.

Treatment for Thoracic Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament with Posterior Circumferential Decompression.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of the posterior approach for thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (TOPLL) by using a special "L" osteotome. METHODS: The present study enrolled 16 consecutive patients (9 men and 7 women) between May 2009 and September 2013. All patients underwent a posterior circumferential decompression osteotomy and segmental instrumentation with interbody fusion. The mean age at surgery was 57.3 years (range, 37-68 years). Patients' data, clinical manifestation, blood loss, length of surgery, complications, visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Frankel grading system before and after surgery were collected and evaluated, retrospectively. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 30 ± 19 months (range, 12-50 months). All patients were successfully treated with posterior compression and segmental instrumentation with interbody fusion. The average operation time was 261.6 ± 51.3 min (range, 190-310 min). The mean blood loss was 980.3 ± 370.5 mL (range, 600-2100 mL). All patients had subjective improvement of motor power and gait. Average preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were 4.2 ± 1.7 and 7.8 ± 2.5 points, respectively. Differences in the overall JOA scores showed significant postoperative improvement. At the last follow-up, all patients improved either by one or two Frankel grades. There was a significant difference between preoperative VAS scores and those 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the 3-month and 12-month results (P > 0.05). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred in 3 patients. Acute neurological deterioration was encountered postoperatively in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Treatment with posterior transpedicular osteotomy and circumferential decompression was found to be safe, effective, reliable, and technically feasible, and keeping the thoracic cavity intact avoids many shortcomings of anterior surgery and results in a satisfactory spinal decompression.