Uncovering the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis: a machine learning approach.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular skin condition that is associated with significant psychosocial and economic burden and a diminished quality of life and work productivity. Accurate diagnosis of HS is challenging due to its unknown etiology, which can lead to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis that results in increased patient and healthcare system burden. We applied machine learning (ML) to a medical and pharmacy claims database using data from 2000 through 2018 to develop a novel model to better understand HS underdiagnosis on a healthcare system level. The primary results demonstrated that high-performing models for predicting HS diagnosis can be constructed using claims data, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 81%-82% observed among the top-performing models. The results of the models developed in this study could be input into the development of an impact of inaction model that determines the cost implications of HS diagnosis and treatment delay to the healthcare system.

CTRP13 alleviates palmitic acid-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis and endothelial cell dysfunction in HUVECs.

C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein 13 (CTRP13) has been reported to participate in cardiovascular diseases. However, the role and molecular mechanism of CTRP13 in obesity-induced endothelial cell damage is still unclear. In palmitic acid (PA)-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), qRT-PCR and western blot were used to examine CTRP13 expression. CCK-8 and TUNEL assays were adopted to assess cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. ROS level and MDA content were evaluated by their commercial kits and inflammatory cytokines were measured using ELISA. Endothelial cell dysfunction was evaluated by detecting NO production and eNOS expression, and tube formation assay was performed to assess angiogenesis. AMPK pathway-related proteins were detected by western blot. The results showed that CTRP13 was downregulated in PA-induced HUVECs. CTRP13 overexpression reduced PA-induced cell viability loss and oxidative stress in HUVECs. Moreover, CTRP13 overexpression suppressed PA-induced inflammation and apoptosis, improved angiogenesis ability, and alleviated endothelial cell dysfunction in HUVECs. In addition, CTRP13 overexpression activated AMPK pathway and regulated the expressions of downstream NOX1/p38 and KLF2. Furthermore, compound C countervailed the impacts of CTRP13 overexpression on cell viability, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis and endothelial function in PA-induced HUVECs. To sum up, CTRP13 overexpression may alleviate PA-induced endothelial cell damage.

Economic Burden of Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: This retrospective study gathered medical/pharmacy claims data on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) between January 01, 2000 and March 31, 2019 from the IBM MarketScan commercial claims database to assess the real-world impact of fatigue on healthcare costs in patients newly diagnosed with IBD. Methods: Eligible participants were ≥18 years, newly diagnosed with IBD (≥2 separate claims), and had ≥12 months of continuous database enrollment before and after fatigue diagnosis. The date of fatigue diagnosis was the index date; participants were followed for 12 months post-index. Patients with (cases) or without (controls) fatigue were matched 1:1 by propensity score matching. Patients with evidence of prior IBD diagnosis/treatment, or those with a chronic disease other than IBD wherein fatigue is the primary symptom, were excluded. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), including hospitalizations, inpatient and outpatient visits, and associated costs were compared between cases and controls. Results: Matched IBD cohorts (21 321 cases/21 321 controls) were identified (42% Crohn's disease [CD] and 58% ulcerative colitis [UC]) with similar baseline characteristics (average age: 46 years; 60% female). Cases versus controls had significantly more all-cause outpatient visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 1.64 [1.61, 1.67], P < .001) and all-cause hospitalizations (IRR [95% CI]: 1.92 [1.81, 2.04], P < .001); as well as significantly higher all-cause total direct healthcare costs (mean: $24 620 vs. $15 324; P < .001). Similar findings were observed for IBD-related outcomes, as well as in CD- and UC-specific subgroups. Conclusions: Presence of fatigue is associated with an increase in HCRU and total medical costs among patients newly diagnosed with IBD.

One-Year Medication Adherence and Persistence in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of Upadacitinib, Adalimumab, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated 12 months adherence and persistence among Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib) and adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This retrospective analysis used administrative claims data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases (2018-2022). Eligible adults had ≥ 1 RA diagnosis before the index date, ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for index medication, and ≥ 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment pre- and post-index. Adherence to treatment [defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%], risk of treatment discontinuation, and mean time to discontinuation were assessed during the 12 months follow-up. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS: In total, 6317 patients were included (683 upadacitinib, 3732 adalimumab, 132 baricitinib, 1770 tofacitinib). Compared with upadacitinib, patients initiating adalimumab [aOR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.69, 0.96)], baricitinib [0.46 (0.31, 0.68)], and tofacitinib [0.74 (0.62, 0.88)] were significantly less likely to achieve PDC ≥ 80%. Risk of treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in patients treated with adalimumab [aHR (95% CI): 1.14 (1.01, 1.29)], baricitinib [1.48 (1.16, 1.90)], and tofacitinib [1.22 (1.07, 1.38)] compared with upadacitinib. Mean time to discontinuation was 256 (upadacitinib), 249 (adalimumab), 221 (baricitinib), and 239 (tofacitinib) days. Similar results were observed in patients with prior TNFi use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA, regardless of recent TNFi experience, initiating upadacitinib were significantly more likely to be adherent and less likely to discontinue therapy compared to adalimumab, baricitinib, and tofacitinib in the first 12 months of treatment.

Real-world dose escalation of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States.

AIM: To compare real-world dose escalation of risankizumab with other US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biologic treatments for management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) in the United States. METHODS: The Merative® MarketScan® Research Database was used to identify adults with ≥2 medical claims for PsO, ≥3 claims of the index biologic medication in the maintenance period, and ≥6 months continuous enrollment pre-induction and ≥6 months after initiation of the maintenance period. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 dosing intervals where the average daily dose was ≥30% higher than the expected daily dose (per FDA-approved dosing). Comparisons between risankizumab and other cohorts were made using chi-square tests and logistic regression models. RESULTS: At the 30% threshold, the percentage of patients with dose escalation in the full maintenance period was significantly lower with risankizumab (2.0%) compared with other drug classes (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-12/23, IL-17, or other IL-23 inhibitors: 17.6%, 10.0%, 18.3%, or 7.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each) and individual biologics (adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and guselkumab; 17.9%, 10.0%, 15.7%, 18.0%, and 7.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A significantly lower proportion of risankizumab-treated patients with PsO had dose escalations compared with patients treated with other biologics.

Development and initial validation of the HS-IGA: a novel hidradenitis suppurativa-specific investigator global assessment for use in interventional trials.

BACKGROUND: Few validated instruments exist for use in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) trials. OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel HS Investigator Global Assessment (HS-IGA) and to validate its psychometric properties. METHODS: Development of HS-IGA involved discussion among stakeholders, including patients, within HISTORIC. Data from replicate phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating HS treatment were utilized. Multivariate models identified lesion type and body region as variables of importance. Classification and regression trees for ordinal responses were built. Validation included assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive validity, responsiveness and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: There were 3024 unique measurements available in PIONEER I. Mean and median lesion counts by region were largely <10 and were highest in axillary and inguinal regions. The mean and median number of regions involved were ≤ 3 for individual lesions and combinations. Regardless of lesion type, axillary and inguinal regions most influenced the HS-IGA score. Accordingly, regions were combined into a six-point IGA based on the maximum lesion number in either upper or lower body regions with a score of 0 (0-1 lesions), 1 (2-5), 2 (6-10), 3 (11-15), 4 (16-20) and 5 (≥ 20 lesions). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0·91 (95% confidence interval 0·87-0·94). Spearman's rank order correlations (SROCs) with HS-PGA and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) were 0·73 and 0·51, respectively (P < 0·001 for both comparisons). SROCs with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), pain numerical rating scale and HS-QoL were 0·42, 0·34 and -0·25, respectively (P < 0·001 for all comparisons). HS-IGA was responsive at weeks 12 and 36. Predictive convergent validity was very good with HS-PGA (area under the curve = 0·89) and with HiSCR (area under the curve = 0·82). Predictive divergent validity was low with DLQI and HS-QoL. CONCLUSIONS: HS-IGA has moderate-to-strong psychometric properties and is simple to calculate.

Interrelationship between 2019-nCov receptor DPP4 and diabetes mellitus targets based on protein interaction network.

Patients with diabetes are more likely to be infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the risk of death is significantly higher than ordinary patients. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) is one of the functional receptor of human coronavirus. Exploring the relationship between diabetes mellitus targets and DPP4 is particularly important for the management of patients with diabetes and COVID-19. We intend to study the protein interaction through the protein interaction network in order to find a new clue for the management of patients with diabetes with COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus targets were obtained from GeneCards database. Targets with a relevance score exceeding 20 were included, and DPP4 protein was added manually. The initial protein interaction network was obtained through String. The targets directly related to DPP4 were selected as the final analysis targets. Importing them into String again to obtain the protein interaction network. Module identification, gene ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were carried out respectively. The impact of DPP4 on the whole network was analyzed by scoring the module where it located. 43 DPP4-related proteins were finally selected from the diabetes mellitus targets and three functional modules were found by the cluster analysis. Module 1 was involved in insulin secretion and glucagon signaling pathway, module 2 and module 3 were involved in signaling receptor binding. The scoring results showed that LEP and apoB in module 1 were the highest, and the scores of INS, IL6 and ALB of cross module associated proteins of module 1 were the highest. DPP4 is widely associated with key proteins in diabetes mellitus. COVID-19 may affect DPP4 in patients with diabetes mellitus, leading to high mortality of diabetes mellitus combined with COVID-19. DPP4 inhibitors and IL-6 antagonists can be considered to reduce the effect of COVID-19 infection on patients with diabetes.

The efficacy and safety of glucokinase activators for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucokinase activators (GKAs) are a novel family of glucose-lowering agents used for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment with different GKAs has been shown to reduce blood glucose levels in these patients. We compared the efficacy/safety of GKAs in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus through a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles published before December 30, 2020. We computed the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change from baseline to the study endpoint for GKA versus placebo treatments. RESULTS: A total of 4 articles (5 studies) were included in the meta-analysis. GKAs were associated with reductions in glycated hemoglobin levels from baseline (WMD, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.466% to -0.134%). No significant difference between GKA and placebo treatment was observed in the results of fasting plasma glucose levels from baseline (WMD 0.013 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.304-0.33 mmol/L). A significantly higher change in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2-h PPG) levels (WMD -2.434 mmol/L; 95% CI, -3.304 to -1.564 mmol/L) was observed following GKA than placebo treatment. GKAs were associated with a higher prevalence of causing hypoglycemic events than placebo treatment (risk difference [RD], 0.06; 95% CI 0.013-0.106). GKAs had no association with the risk of developing adverse effects (RD, 0.038; 95% CI, -0.03-0.106) and serious adverse events (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.004-0.023). CONCLUSIONS: GKAs were more effective for postprandial blood glucose control. However, these agents showed a significantly high risk of causing hypoglycemia. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021220364.

The efficacy and safety of glucokinase activators for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucokinase activators are a novel family of glucose-lowering agents used for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Glucokinase activators blind to GK activate the enzyme allosterically. Treatment with different GKAs has been shown to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the efficacy/safety of glucokinase activators in T2DM patients through a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles published before December 30, 2020. Two independent reviewers extracted the information from article. The quality of articles were assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the 5 items of scale proposed by Jadad. We computed the weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for a change from baseline to the study endpoint for glucokinase activators vs placebo. Egger test and Begg test were used to assess the possible publication bias caused by the tendency of published studies to be positive. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis will compare the efficacy and safety of glucokinase activators and placebo for the treatment of T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis will provide advanced evidence on the efficacy and safety of glucokinase activators for the treatment of T2DM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and patient consent are not required because this study is a literature-based study. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021220364.

Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF), introduced in 2018 to reduce injection-site pain, compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a US claims database (IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database) from February 2018 to January 2020. Patients at least 18 years of age who were naïve to adalimumab 6 months before the index date (date of first adalimumab claim) and with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy coverage were eligible for the study. Adherence was assessed by determining the proportion of days covered (PDC) and the percentage of patients with PDC ≥ 80% during the 12-month follow-up period. Persistence was evaluated by measuring the rate of discontinuation and days to discontinuation (i.e., time on treatment) from the index date over the 12-month follow-up period. Continuous adherence outcomes (PDC) were evaluated using linear regression models. Binary adherence outcomes (PDC ≥ 80%) were assessed using logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess persistence outcomes. RESULTS: There were 2195 and 1005 patients in the ADA-CF and ADA-C cohorts, respectively, with most using adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (ADA-CF 29.7%, ADA-C 27.2%) and psoriasis (ADA-CF 24.5%, ADA-C 31.9%). Significantly greater adherence was achieved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C (mean PDC [standard deviation] 0.68 [0.30] vs 0.61 [0.32], P < 0.0001). A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving ADA-CF (47.2%) vs ADA-C (39.6%) had PDC ≥ 80% (P < 0.0001). The discontinuation rate was significantly lower for the ADA-CF cohort (46.4%) compared with ADA-C (55.9%, P < 0.0001), resulting in a 27% lower likelihood of discontinuation during the 12-month follow-up period (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.82; P < 0.0001) and longer time on treatment (260 vs 232 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence are significantly improved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C.

Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy and Incidence of Parkinson Disease Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Importance: Despite established genetic and pathophysiologic links between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Parkinson disease (PD), clinical data supporting this association remain scarce. Although systemic inflammation is considered a potential biological mechanism shared between the 2 diseases, the role of reduced systemic inflammation through IBD-directed anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in PD risk is largely unknown. Objective: To compare the incidence of PD among individuals with or without IBD and to assess whether PD risk among patients with IBD is altered by anti-TNF therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing information in the Truven Health MarketScan administrative claims database and the Medicare Supplemental Database between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2016. Individuals were selected who had at least 2 claims for IBD diagnoses, at least 6 months of follow-up, and no prior diagnosis of PD on or before the IBD index date. Exposure to Anti-TNF therapy was measured from the anti-TNF index date to the last date of anti-TNF coverage or the end of enrollment or PD index date, whichever was earliest. Incidence rates per 1000 person-years were calculated, and crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios were estimated by Poisson regression models and presented with 95% CIs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of PD among patients with IBD with or without exposure to anti-TNF therapy. Results: In total, 144 018 individuals with IBD were matched on age, sex, and year of index date with 720 090 unaffected controls. Of them, 1796 individuals had at least 2 PD diagnoses and at least 1 filled PD-related prescription. The mean (SD) age of individuals with IBD was 51 (17) years, and 44% were men. The incidence of PD among patients with IBD was 28% higher than that among unaffected matched controls (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.44; P < .001). A 78% reduction in the incidence rate of PD was detected among patients with IBD who were exposed to anti-TNF therapy compared with those who were not exposed (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.88; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: A higher incidence of PD was observed among patients with IBD than among individuals without IBD. Early exposure to antiinflammatory anti-TNF therapy was associated with substantially reduced PD incidence. These findings support a role of systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis of both diseases. Further studies are required to determine whether anti-TNF treatment administered to high-risk individuals may mitigate PD risk.

Effect of Adalimumab on Clinical Outcomes and Health-related Quality of Life Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in a Clinical Practice Setting: Results From InspirADA.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomised trials have described the benefits of adalimumab [ADA] for ulcerative colitis [UC]; however, few data are available on health-related quality of life [HRQL] and health care costs in clinical practice. METHODS: InspirADA, a multicentre, prospective study, evaluated the effect of ADA in patients with moderate to severe UC treated according to usual clinical practice. Outcomes assessed were: Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] response/remission rates; changes in HRQL; all-cause direct costs; and UC-related direct and indirect costs from baseline to Week 26. RESULTS: Data from 463 patients were analysed. At Week 26, 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 71%) of patients achieved response; 48% [95% CI: 44%, 53%] were in remission. For the overall population, significant [all p < 0.001] improvements from baseline to Week 26 were observed for the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ] (mean change ± standard deviation [SD]: 17.4 ± 14.5) and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level [EQ-5D-5L] (index: 0.1 ± 0.2; visual analogue scale [VAS]: 19.5 ± 25.8). Parallel improvements were seen in work productivity [11% absolute decrease in absenteeism; 25% absolute decrease in impairment while working; and 27% absolute decrease in impairment of ability to perform daily activities, all p < 0.001]. Among study completers, cumulative all-cause medical costs and UC-related medical costs were significantly [both p < 0.001] reduced by 59% and 77%, respectively, 6 months after initiation of therapy compared with the preceding 6 months. The safety profile of ADA was consistent with that observed in previous clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: ADA therapy in usual clinical practice is effective at improving and maintaining symptomatic control, improving HRQL, and decreasing costs of medical care among patients with UC.

Effect of Adalimumab on Visual Functioning in Patients With Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, and Panuveitis in the VISUAL-1 and VISUAL-2 Trials.

Importance: Adalimumab was recently approved for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Objective: To assess the effect of adalimumab on the visual functioning and quality of life in patients with corticosteroid-dependent noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Design: A post hoc analysis of clinical trials of adults with active (VISUAL-1) and inactive (VISUAL-2) noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis was conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, Australia, Latin America, and Japan. A total of 217 patients (110 adalimumab, 107 placebo) in VISUAL-1 and 226 patients (115 adalimumab, 111 placebo) in VISUAL-2 were studied using intent-to-treat analyses. The clinical trials were conducted between August 10, 2010, and May 14, 2015. Interventions: In VISUAL-1 and VISUAL-2, patients were randomized to receive adalimumab, 80-mg, subcutaneous loading dose followed by 40 mg every other week or placebo for 80 weeks. All patients underwent prednisone tapering, with patients in VISUAL-1 receiving an initial prednisone burst. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) composite score questionnaire assessed the impact of visual impairment from the patient's perspective; scores on the questionnaire range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related quality of life. The change in NEI VFQ-25 from best state achieved prior to week 6 (VISUAL-1) and from baseline state (VISUAL-2) to the final or early termination visit was determined in each group and statistically compared using analysis of variance. The temporal effects of adalimumab and placebo on NEI VFQ-25 were investigated using a longitudinal model. Results: Of the 217 patients in VISUAL-1, 124 (57.1%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 42.7 (14.9) years. Of the 226 patients in VISUAL-2, 138 (61.1%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (13.4). In VISUAL-1, the change from final score to best score in NEI VFQ-25 was -1.30 for adalimumab and -5.50 for placebo-a difference of 4.20 (95% CI, 1.04 to 7.36; P = .01) associated with adalimumab compared with placebo. In VISUAL-2, the change from baseline NEI VFQ-25 was 3.36 for adalimumab and 1.24 for placebo-a difference of 2.12 (95% CI, -0.81 to 5.04; P = .16). In both trials, the longitudinal models showed a significant difference in NEI VFQ-25 between adalimumab and placebo of 3.07 (95% CI, 2.09 to 4.06; P < .001) and 4.66 (95% CI, 0.05 to 9.26; P = .048) in the VISUAL-1 (74.15 vs 71.08) and VISUAL-2 (82.39 vs 77.73) trials, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This post hoc analysis suggests that adalimumab is associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported visual functioning for patients with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01138657 (VISUAL-1) and NCT01124838 (VISUAL-2).

Impact of Participation in the Adalimumab (Humira) Patient Support Program on Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Course: Results from the PASSION Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are treated with adalimumab (ADA) are offered a proprietary patient support program (PSP, AbbVie Care®). The main objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of ADA on RA treatment course over time in the context of PSP utilization. METHODS: PASSION was a 78-week post-marketing observational study of RA patients with an insufficient response to ≥1 DMARD newly initiating ADA in routine clinical care that was conducted in Europe, Israel, Mexico, Puerto Rico, and Australia. One prior biologic DMARD was allowed. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID; improvement of ≥0.22 compared to baseline) in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at week 78. Additionally, multiple clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated over time. Patients were categorized based on their participation in the PSP: ever (PSP users) vs. never (PSP non-users). Safety events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Overall, 42.8% of PSP users achieved the MCID in HAQ-DI at week 78 (improvement of at least 0.22 compared to baseline). From 1025 enrolled, 48.7% of patients were PSP users while treated with ADA. The percentage of patients achieving MCID in the HAQ-DI was higher in PSP users vs. PSP non-users (48.1 vs. 37.8%) at week 78 (p < 0.001, NRI). Most of the studied clinical outcomes and PROs showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) from baseline to week 78 favoring PSP users over PSP non-users. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe RA who initiated ADA, improvements in clinical, functional, and PROs were achieved in real-world settings with significantly greater improvements among PSP users in comparison with PSP non-users. FUNDING: AbbVie. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01383421.

Effect of adalimumab on the work-related outcomes scores in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of adalimumab plus MTX (ADA + MTX) vs MTX monotherapy on work-related outcomes in early RA patients with elevated risk of employment loss. METHODS: A post hoc analysis at weeks 26 and 24 from the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation with Methotrexate and Adalimumab (OPTIMA) and PRevention Of Work Disability (PROWD) trials, respectively, was conducted in MTX-naïve RA patients randomized to ADA + MTX or placebo (PBO) + MTX. Work instability was assessed using the RA-Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS) and work productivity was measured with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Employed patients with a baseline RA-WIS score ⩾10, indicating medium to high risk for job loss, were included (OPTIMA, n = 320; PROWD, n = 124). RESULTS: Patients receiving ADA + MTX in OPTIMA had significantly greater improvements in RA-WIS compared with PBO + MTX (mean change -7.22 vs -5.23, respectively). Significantly higher percentages of patients in the ADA + MTX group experienced improvements in one or more risk category (58 vs 47%) and ⩾5 (55 vs 43%), ⩾7 (47 vs 35%) and ⩾9 (42% vs 26%) points in their RA-WIS score. These trends were seen in PROWD but were not significant. In OPTIMA, patients receiving ADA + MTX showed significant changes in percentage points from baseline vs PBO + MTX in activity impairment, presenteeism and overall work impairment (-32.0 vs -23.7, -24.6 vs -17.1, -27.3 vs -18.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among early RA patients with elevated risk of employment loss, ADA + MTX therapy was associated with a significant reduction in work instability vs PBO + MTX. Significantly greater percentages of patients receiving ADA + MTX therapy achieved clinically meaningful improvements in their RA-WIS scores.

ASAS40 and ASDAS clinical responses in the ABILITY-1 clinical trial translate to meaningful improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life and work productivity in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of achieving Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40) response or an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID) state on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA). METHODS: Data are from ABILITY-1, a phase 3 trial of adalimumab vs placebo in nr-axSpA patients. PROs included the HAQ for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) score and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Patients were grouped by clinical response using ASAS40 response and ASDAS disease states at week 12. Changes in PROs from baseline to week 12 were compared between groups using analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline scores. RESULTS: At week 12, 47 of 179 patients were ASAS40 responders and 26 of 176 patients achieved ASDAS-ID (ASDAS <1.3). Compared with non-responders (n = 132), ASAS40 responders (n = 47) had a significantly greater improvement in mean HAQ-S (-0.65 vs -0.05, P < 0.0001), SF-36 PCS (12.4 vs 0.7, P < 0.0001), presenteeism (-24.7 vs -2.2, P < 0.0001), overall work impairment (-23.9 vs -2.5, P < 0.0001) and activity impairment (-33.5 vs -0.9, P < 0.0001) at week 12. Similarly, ASDAS-ID, ASDAS clinically important improvement (ASDAS-CII; improvement >1.1) and major improvement (ASDAS-MI; improvement >2.0) were associated with significantly greater improvements from baseline in the majority of the PROs. CONCLUSION: Among nr-axSpA patients, ASAS40, ASDAS-CII and ASDAS-MI response and achievement of ASDAS-ID were associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life and work productivity in a higher percentage of patients.

Reliability and Validity of the Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS) in a clinical trial setting. METHODS: Secondary analyses were conducted using data from a 56-week, randomized controlled trial of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patient-reported outcome measures included the RA-WIS, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Pain, data for which were collected at baseline and at weeks 12, 16, 24, and 56. Data were analyzed for reliability, validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: Among 148 patients whose data were analyzed, more than half were women (56.1%) with a mean age of 46.8 years. On average, patients experienced RA symptoms for 8.7 months; the mean 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was 5.9, and the mean HAQ - Disability Index was 1.3. The RA-WIS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability (α = 0.89 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91, respectively). At baseline and week 24, moderate to strong correlations were seen between RA-WIS total scores and the HAQ, the Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and the Pain Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire, ranging from 0.47 to 0.81 (all P < 0.0001). Mean RA-WIS total scores and work disability risk levels discriminated between clinical severity scores on the DAS28, the HAQ - Disability Index, and the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (all P < 0.05). Mean baseline to week 24 RA-WIS total change scores were significantly different among American College of Rheumatology responder groups (P ≤ 0.0001) and between DAS28 remission status groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence supporting the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the RA-WIS for evaluating work disability in patients with RA in a clinical trial setting.

Adalimumab therapy is associated with reduced risk of hospitalization in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adalimumab is effective for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed whether adalimumab, in addition to standard UC therapy, reduced the risk for hospitalization (from all causes, from complications of UC, or from complications of UC or the drugs used to treat it) and colectomy in patients with moderate to severe UC compared with placebo. METHODS: Data were combined from patients that received induction therapy (a 160-mg dose followed by an 80-mg dose of adalimumab) or placebo in 2 trials (ULTRA 1 and ULTRA 2; n = 963). The risks of hospitalization and colectomy were compared between groups using unadjusted rates during the 8-week induction period, and patient-year-adjusted rates during 52 weeks. Statistical differences between groups were determined using the χ(2) method and Z score normal approximations. Numbers of hospitalizations were compared using Poisson regression with time offset. RESULTS: Significant reductions in risk of all-cause, UC-related, and UC- or drug-related hospitalizations (by 40%, 50%, and 47%, respectively; P < .05 for all comparisons) were observed within the first 8 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Significantly lower incidence rates for all-cause (0.18 vs 0.26; P = .03), UC-related (0.12 vs 0.22; P = .002), and UC- or drug-related (0.14 vs 0.24; P = .005) hospitalizations were observed during 52 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Rates of colectomy did not differ significantly between patients given adalimumab vs placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe UC, the addition of adalimumab to standard of care treatment reduced the number of hospitalizations for any cause, as well as for UC-related and UC- or drug-related complications, compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00385736 and NCT00408629.