Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Letermovir (LTV), an antiviral with exclusive activity against Cytomegalovirus (CMV), is approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. The use of LTV in the pediatric HCT population is off-label, and has limited literature to support its use. PROCEDURE: This was a single-center, retrospective, matched (1:1 LTV:non-LTV) cohort study of allogeneic HCT recipients transplanted at Children's Hospital Colorado from 2015 to 2022. The primary endpoint was clinically significant CMV DNAemia (defined as a CMV viral load >1000 copies/mL or any CMV DNAemia leading to preemptive treatment) through 6 months post transplant. Secondary outcomes included time to clinically significant CMV DNAemia, drug adverse effects, and dose adjustments of concomitant cyclosporine and voriconazole (known drug interactions). RESULTS: We compared 41 patients who received LTV prophylaxis to 41 patients who received no CMV prophylaxis. There was less clinically significant CMV DNAemia through D+180 in the LTV group (9.8% vs. 17.0%, p = .33). Overall, LTV was well tolerated, and 87.8% of patients experienced no adverse effects related to the drug. There was no observed pattern in LTV effect on cyclosporine serum concentrations, but LTV was associated with decreased voriconazole trough levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, the use of LTV prophylaxis in pediatric stem cell patients was associated with reduced clinically significant CMV DNAemia through D+180.

Basiliximab as maintenance immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients: A single pediatric center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant recipients are at risk for complications from prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive drugs, pharmacokinetic challenges in maintaining consistent immunosuppression, and medication non-adherence. Basiliximab (BAS), an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, is used for induction therapy across many pediatric heart transplant centers, but use as maintenance immunosuppression has not been well described. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single pediatric center cohort study of heart transplant recipients who received BAS for maintenance immunosuppression (defined as >2 monthly doses) from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Ten patients met study criteria with a median age of 17.5 (5-22) years and median 9.6 (1.2-18.9) years since transplant at time of BAS initiation. The primary indications for BAS use were recurrent rejection (n = 4), fluctuating immunosuppression levels (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 3). A median of 5.5 (3-32) monthly BAS doses were received. Three patients had a rejection event while on BAS. Calcineurin inhibitor exposure was reduced in 70% of patients. Three of the 10 patients were alive at last follow-up. There was one documented infection during BAS use, and no hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly BAS infusions were well tolerated and allowed for reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure in most patients. Mortality commonly occurred despite BAS use, potentially reflecting the acuity of this patient cohort. BAS can be considered for maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric patients with fluctuating immunosuppressive levels and/or renal dysfunction. More studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes and explore expanded use of BAS in the pediatric heart transplant population.