RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer have improved, especially among human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative subtypes. The frequency and significance of biomarker profile change in residual disease are unclear. This study aimed to determine the rate of biomarker profile changes after NAC and the impact on clinical outcomes in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Upon institutional review board approval, the study identified 634 consecutive patients treated with NAC between 2010 and 2022 at two academic institutions. The study cohort was focused on patients with residual disease who underwent biomarker profile retesting. Biomarker profile change for each subtype was compared across groups using Fisher-Irwin tests. Cox Proportional Hazards Model and Kaplan-Meier plots were performed to evaluate the association of changed versus unchanged biomarker profile with event-free survival. RESULTS: Biomarker retesting was performed for 259 (61.4 %) of 422 patients with residual disease. Biomarker profile change occurred in 18.1 % overall and was significantly higher among those with pre-NAC HER2+ disease (32.7 %, 17/52) than among those with HER2-disease (14.5 %, 30/207) (p = 0.004). Conversion of pre-NAC biomarker profiles of HR+HER2- and HR+HER2+ to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) post-NAC may be associated with worse event-free survival, hazard ratios of 2.23 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.90-5.53; p = 0.08), trending toward significance, and 36.7 (95 % CI, 2.2-610.8; p = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results from one of the largest contemporary cohorts demonstrated that biomarker profile change in patients with residual disease after NAC was common. Furthermore, specific biomarker profile change in residual disease may have prognostic value. These findings strengthen the rationale for routine re-testing of biomarkers in residual disease after NAC.
RESUMEN
The differential diagnosis of malignant spindle cell neoplasms in the breast most frequently rests between malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT) and metaplastic carcinoma (MBC). Diagnosis of MPT can be challenging due to diffuse stromal overgrowth, keratin (CK) and/or p63 immunopositivity, and absent CD34 expression, which can mimic MBC, especially in core biopsies. Distinction of MPT from MBC has clinical implications, with differences in surgical approach, chemotherapy, and radiation. In this study, we evaluated MPT (78 tumors, 64 patients) for stromal CK, p63, and CD34 expression and profiled a subset (n=31) by targeted next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS), with comparison to MBC (n=44). Most MPT (71%) were CK+ and/or p63+, including 32% CK+ (25/77 focal) and 65% p63+ (32/66 focal, 10/66 patchy, 1/66 diffuse). Thirty-percent of MPT expressed both CK and p63 (20/66), compared to 95% of MBC (40/42, p<0.001). CK and/or p63 were positive in CD34+ and CD34- MPT. Recurrent genetic aberrations in MPT involved TERT, TP53, MED12, CDKN2A, chromatin modifiers, growth factor receptors/ligands, and PI-3K and MAPK pathway genes. Only MED12 (39%, 12/31) and SETD2 (13%, 4/31) were exclusively mutated in MPT and not MBC (p<0.001 and p=0.044, respectively), whereas PIK3R1 mutations were only found in MBC (35%, 13/35, p<0.001). Comparative literature review additionally identified ARID1B, EGFR, FLNA, NRAS, PDGFRB, RAD50, and RARA alterations enriched or exclusively in MPT versus MBC. MED12 was mutated in MPT with diffuse stromal overgrowth (53%, 9/17), CD34- MPT (41%, 7/17), and CK+ and/or p63+ MPT (39%, 9/23), including 36% of CD34- MPT with CK and/or p63 expression. Overall, MED12 mutation and/or CD34 expression were observed in 68% (21/31) MPT, including 61% (14/23) of CK+ and/or p63+ tumors. Our results emphasize the prevalence of CK and p63 expression in MPT and demonstrate diagnostic utility of NGS, especially in MPT with confounding factors that can mimic MBC.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy "graduates" if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. RESULTS: There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%-99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. CONCLUSIONS: The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority >90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.