Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Orthod ; 43(6): 614-621, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735379

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables a 3D-volume-imaging without ionizing radiation. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to present a post-processing-free method for cephalometric analysis of a MRI-dataset and to examine whether there is a significant difference between cephalometric analysis of conventional 2D cephalograms and MRI scans. METHODS: One MRI scan each was performed on three cadaver heads using a 3T-MR-scanner. Cephalometric analysis was conducted directly on the 3D dataset. All reference points were projected onto a virtual sagittal plane that was perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal plane. Double-sided points were averaged. Cephalometric angles were measured from the projected points. Results were compared with cephalometric measurements on conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs). The cephalometric analysis was performed by five raters. RESULTS: 390-angle measurements were obtained. The inter-rater reliability was high [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ≥ 0.74 for all angles]. Differences between the measurements on the cephalograms and MRI scans ranged between -0.91° (-1.88°, 0.07°) and 0.97° (-0.63°, 2.57°) on average and were equivalent with respect to a margin of [-2°, 2°] in all angles except L1-Me-Tgo (Bonferroni-Holm-corrected P < 0.05 in all angles except L1-Me-Tgo). The best match was found for the SNA angle. CONCLUSION: The clinical comparability of the MRI- and LCR-based cephalometry could be stated. Using MRI in orthodontics would reduce radiation exposure and the risk of stochastic radiation damage, which is of importance especially in younger patients.


Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Cefalometría/métodos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
J Orofac Orthop ; 79(4): 259-266, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29947815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, by comparing maxillary sinus volumes, how asymmetries related to oculoauriculovertebral spectrum (OAVS) affect upper-jaw development. METHODS: From pre-existing multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) datasets, we selected 20 cases of 11 female and 9 male patients aged 6.1-24 years who were clinically and radiographically symmetrical (group 1) plus 20 cases of 8 female and 12 male patients aged 5.7-23.9 years who had OAVS (group 2). After three-dimensional reconstruction of the datasets, the volumes of the left and right maxillary sinuses were calculated and compared based on patient groups and based on the sides affected or unaffected by OAVS. To this end, the OAVS patients were subdivided into a group in whom both external acoustic pores were radiographically present (group 2a) and a group in whom the pore on the affected side was congenitally missing (group 2b). RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was very high (0.997). Significantly larger volumes of the maxillary sinuses, amounting to a mean of 13.4 ml, were observed in the control group than in the asymmetric OAVS groups where the volumes averaged 9.8 ml or 10.3 ml, respectively (p = 0.03). No statistically significant differences in sinus volumes were found between the two OAVS groups (p = 0.557) and between the sides affected or unaffected by the OAVS (p = 0.8311 in group 2a and 0.4961 in group 2b). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found the volumes of both maxillary sinuses to be somewhat smaller in the asymmetric patients than in the symmetric control group. This might indicate that OAVS was associated with a mild generalized hypoplasia of the maxilla, but significantly different sinus volumes were not seen between the affected and unaffected sides.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Goldenhar/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Maxilar/anomalías , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Int J Prosthodont ; 30(6): 545­552, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29084299

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the in vitro effects of different cements, abutment surface preconditioning, and artificial aging on the maximum tensile force needed to detach cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) from dental implants with titanium abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 tissue-level implants were combined with standardized titanium abutments. For each test group, eight cantilever FDPs were fabricated using selective laser melting (cobalt-chromium [CoCr] alloy). The inner surfaces of the cantilever FDPs and half of the abutments were sandblasted and then joined by use of four different cements (two permanent and two semi-permanent) in two different amounts per cement. Subgroups were tested after either artificial aging (thermocycling and chewing simulation) or 3 days of water storage. Finally, axial pull off-tests were performed for each abutment separately. RESULTS: Cement type and surface pretreatment significantly affected decementation behavior. The highest retention forces (approximately 1,200 N) were associated with sandblasted abutments and permanent cements. With unconditioned abutments, temporary cements (Fu < 100 N), as well as glass-ionomer cement (Fu ≈ 100 N), resulted in rather low retention forces. Zinc phosphate cement guaranteed high retention forces. After aging, retention was sufficient only for cementation with zinc phosphate cement and for the combination of sandblasted abutments and glass-ionomer cement. CONCLUSIONS: When glass-ionomer cement is used to fix cantilever FDPs on implants, sandblasting of standard titanium abutments may help prevent loss of retention. Retention forces were still high for FDPs fixed with zinc phosphate cement, even when the abutments were not pretreated. Use of permanent cements only, however, is recommended to prevent unwanted loosening of cantilever FDPs.


Asunto(s)
Pilares Dentales , Cementos Dentales , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado , Resistencia a la Tracción , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Retención de Prótesis Dentales , Ensayo de Materiales , Propiedades de Superficie , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...