RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe differences in demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes between rural and urban patients suffering brain injury. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Emcare, MEDLINE, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing epidemiology and outcomes of rural and urban brain trauma was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. RESULTS: 36 studies with ~ 2.5-million patients were included. Incidence of brain injury was higher in males, regardless of location. Rates of transport-related brain injuries, particularly involving motorized vehicles other than cars, were significantly higher in rural populations (OR:3.63, 95% CI[1.58,8.35], p = 0.002), whereas urban residents had more fall-induced brain trauma (OR:0.73, 95% CI[0.66,0.81], p < 0.00001). Rural patients were 28% more likely to suffer severe injury, indicated by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)≤8 (OR:1.28, 95% CI[1.04,1.58], p = 0.02). There was no difference in mortality (OR:1.09, 95% CI[0.73,1.61], p = 0.067), however, urban patients were twice as likely to be discharged with a good outcome (OR:0.52, 95% CI[0.41,0.67], p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Rurality is associated with greater severity and poorer outcomes of traumatic brain injury. Transport accidents disproportionally affect those traveling on rural roads. Future research recommendations include addition of prehospital data, adequate follow-up, standardized measures, and sub-group analyses of high-risk groups, e.g. Indigenous populations.
RESUMEN
Store-and-forward teledermatology (SAFT) has become increasingly popular as a means to increase access to specialist care and address healthcare disparities such as those experienced by rural communities. A contemporary systematic overview of the Australian SAFT services and outcomes for all dermatological conditions is missing. This scoping review provides an overview of Australian SAFT models. Twelve studies were identified through web databases, grey literature sites and reference lists of eligible articles. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating doctor-to-dermatologist Australian SAFT services provided to Australians for all skin conditions but excluded the studies that solely focused on skin cancers. Data on study design, setting, population, SAFT model, referral characteristics, patient, and general practitioner perspectives, diagnostic concordance, and measured outcomes such as follow up, investigation and waiting time were extracted. Quality of the included studies was assessed using CASP tools. Synthesis reveals that SAFT can be used for patients with any dermatological condition, provides more accurate diagnostics compared to cases without dermatologist input, may reduce waiting times for dermatological expertise, and users generally had positive experiences with SAFT. Although results are positive, this review reveals the heterogenous nature of the literature on SAFT in Australia and a need to establish a uniform approach to assessing the outcomes and impacts of such services.