RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purposes of successful induction of labor (IOL) are to shorten the time for IOL to delivery, increase the vaginal delivery rate, and reduce the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity. In cases of unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6), cervical ripening is advised to improve vaginal delivery rate. It may be initiated by mechanical (double balloon catheter (DBC), synthetic osmotic dilator) or pharmacologic (prostaglandins) methods, and the problem is complex due to the multitude of cervical ripening methods. We are constantly looking for the optimal protocol of cervical ripening for each woman. The present study aims to elucidate whether cervical ripening method is associated with increase rate of vaginal delivery, good women's experience and unaltered long-term quality of life after cervical ripening at term regarding maternal and obstetric characteristics. METHODS AND DESIGN: The MATUCOL study is a monocentric, prospective, observational study of all consecutive women who required cervical ripening (Bishop score <6) using different methods (DBC, vaginal dinoprostone, oral misoprostol) with a live fetus at term (≥37 weeks) between January 2020 and August 2021. The outcomes will be mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal morbidity, discomfort/pain assessments during cervical ripening, women's experience and satisfaction, and the impact of cervical ripening on the health-related quality of life at 3 months. If it reports a significant efficacy/safety/perinatal morbidity/women's satisfaction/quality of life at 3 months post-delivery associated with a method of cervical ripening in a specific situation (gestational and/or fetal disease) using a multivariate analysis, its use should be reconsidered in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: This study will reveal that some cervical ripening methods will be more effectiveness, safe, with good women's experiences and QOL at 3 months compared to others regarding maternal and obstetric characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is being performed at La Roche sur Yon Hospital following registration as GNEDS on January 8, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Maduración Cervical/fisiología , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/psicología , Adulto , Maduración Cervical/efectos de los fármacos , Cuello del Útero/efectos de los fármacos , Cuello del Útero/patología , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/mortalidad , Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Dinoprostona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) according to body mass index (BMI) at conception and the interval between LSG and pregnancy. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were obtained for all women who became pregnant after LSG at a center in France between December 2001 and December 2011. Frequencies of perinatal events according to BMI at conception and the interval between LSG and pregnancy were compared. RESULTS: A total of 63 pregnancies occurring in 54 patients were included, among which 52 (83%) occurred after the first postoperative year and 26 (41%) in women who remained obese. Compared with women who were no longer obese at conception, women who were still obese delivered neonates of significantly lower gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and birth weight (P=0.001). Odds of preterm delivery were also increased (odds ratio 4.37, 95% confidence interval 1.17-16.27; P=0.03). Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the interval between LSG and pregnancy did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Women who remain obese following LSG are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including low gestational age at birth, low birth weight, and preterm delivery, and should be regarded as a risk group.