Long-term outcomes of trapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction for trapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Trapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis is a common condition for which the reference standard treatment after failure of non-operative measures is trapeziectomy. Several techniques have been devised to avoid proximal migration of the first metacarpal bone (M1) with impingement on the scaphoid bone. We have developed a Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction technique that avoids potential complications of tendon harvesting. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of this technique. HYPOTHESIS: Trapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction is a reliable option for providing lasting pain relief in patients with trapezio-metacarpal osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, single-centre, single-surgeon, retrospective cohort study in consecutive patients managed by primary trapeziectomy. We excluded patients with revision trapeziectomy or less than 10 years' follow-up. The primary outcome was event-free survival, defined as absence of revision surgery and of a numerical rating scale score for pain above 3/10. The secondary criteria were clinical tolerance of the Gore-Tex® implant and radiological changes. The patients were assessed at last follow-up either in person or during a teleconsultation. RESULTS: Of 78 included joints, 64 were assessed during patient visits and 24 by teleconsultation. At 10 years, the event-free survival rate was 91.3%, and 60.3% of patients were free of pain. Evidence of osteolysis was visible in 24% of patients. No patient experienced clinical intolerance of the Gore-Tex® implant. The mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 25.5. Metacarpo-phalangeal hyperextension was significantly increased, to 30.6°, and the mean trapezial space ratio was significantly decreased, to 39.1% of the baseline value. CONCLUSION: Long-term event-free survival was high. Functional outcomes and pain were similar to previous reports. Trapeziectomy with Gore-Tex® ligament reconstruction obviates the need for tendon harvesting. Osteolysis developed in some patients but did not correlate with clinical intolerance. Long-term clinical and radiological monitoring is in order after Gore-Tex® implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Observational, single-centre, single-surgeon, retrospective cohort study.

Does total wrist denervation give reliable long-term results? Survival curve with an average follow-up of 8.2 years.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is the main reason why patients consult for degenerative and posttraumatic wrist conditions. While the many surgical techniques make choosing the appropriate procedure difficult, total wrist denervation, which has an "analgesic" aim, remains an accessible therapeutic solution to treat this symptomatology. Nevertheless, long-term results remain controversial, and few studies have focused on the survival of this procedure. HYPOTHESIS: Total wrist denervation provides lasting pain relief. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single center, single operator (DLN), retrospective observational study. We analyzed 63 wrists. The mean age at the time of the procedure was 53.7 years. We verified the primary endpoint for survival, which included no further analgesic procedures and no significant residual pain (NRS≤3). Patient satisfaction and the quality of the wrist function were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.2 years. Some of the patients (12.7%) did not respond to treatment. We reported 1 neuroma of the superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve, 2 CRPS and 11 revision surgeries. We observed that the treatment became less effective over time. The median survival was 8.8 years. The survival rate of the procedure fell to 13.5% at the last follow-up. The mean residual pain was 3.4 on a numerical rating scale and the mean DASH score was 23.5. The mean satisfaction level, on a scale from 0 to 10, was 7.3 and most patients (79.6%) would undergo this procedure again. DISCUSSION: Survival of the total wrist denervation at the last follow-up was low in our study. Even though the treatment became less effective over time, the quality of the wrist function remained satisfactory and similar to the different studies previously published on the subject. There were very few complications and revisions. CONCLUSION: Total wrist denervation therefore remains an interesting surgical solution for patients with chronic wrist pain as it preserves mobility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Single center, single operator retrospective observational study.

Outcome of Silicone Implant for Treatment After Failure of Primary Trapeziometacarpal Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of a silicone implant used after failure of primary trapeziometacarpal (TMC) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 Tie-in silicone implants performed between January 2005 and December 2015. All silicone implants were used for revision after failure of TMC surgery. We determined the time between implantation and the date of diagnosis of the failed revision procedure (rupture, major wear, dislocation, or poor clinical tolerance). RESULTS: Median survival was 2.15 years. Only 3 patients did not show wear, but one was lost after 1 year of follow-up. We found 10 cases with rupture of the implant, 5 with implant instability (subluxation or dislocation), 3 implants with abnormal wear, and 1 patient who reported residual pain. A total of 42% of failures were associated with silicone synovitis CONCLUSIONS: Survival of the Tie-in silicone implant in TMC revision surgery is poor; nearly half of implants failed at 2 years. The rate of silicone synovitis is also important because future revision might be more complex owing to bone loss. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements of glenoid version and inclination are recommended for planning glenoid implantation in shoulder arthroplasty. However, current manual or semi-automated 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) methods are user-dependent and time-consuming. We assessed whether the use of a 3D automated method is accurate and reliable to measure glenoid version and inclination in osteoarthritic shoulders. METHODS: CT scans of osteoarthritic shoulders of 60 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty were obtained. Automated, surgeon-operated, image analysis software (Glenosys; Imascap) was developed to measure glenoid version and inclination. The anatomic scapular reference planes were defined as the mean of the peripheral points of the scapular body as well as the plane perpendicular to it, passing along the supraspinatus fossa line. Measurements were compared with those obtained using previously described manual or semi-automated methods, including the Friedman version angle on 2D CTs, Friedman method on 3D multiplanar reconstructions (corrected Friedman method), Ganapathi-Iannotti and Lewis-Armstrong methods on 3D volumetric reconstructions (for glenoid version), and Maurer method (for glenoid inclination).The mean differences (and standard deviation) and the concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated. Two orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the images for the interobserver analysis, with one of them measuring them twice more for the intraobserver analysis; interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The mean difference in the Glenosys glenoid version measurement was 2.0° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.93) compared with the Friedman method, 2.5° ± 3.2° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the corrected Friedman method, 1.5° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.94) compared with the Ganapathi-Iannotti method, and 1.8° ± 3.8° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the Lewis-Armstrong method. There was a mean difference of 0.2° ± 4.7° (CCC = 0.78) between the inclination measurements made with the Glenosys and Maurer methods. The difference between the overall average 2D and 3D measurements was not significant (p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Use of fully automated software for 3D measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders is reliable and accurate, showing excellent correlation with previously described manual or semi-automated methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of automated surgeon-operated image analysis software to evaluate 3D glenoid anatomy eliminates interobserver and intraobserver discrepancies, improves the accuracy of preoperative planning for shoulder replacement, and offers a potential gain of time for the surgeon.