RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of increased inflammatory laboratory markers in patients with periprosthetic fractures. We also studied the likelihood of the elevation of these values in predicting deep prosthetic joint infection. From 2000 to 2006, 204 patients with periprosthetic hip fractures were treated at our institution. Patients had white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein obtained on initial evaluation; these were then compared with subsequent hip aspiration, surgical pathology, and deep cultures obtained at the time of revision surgery. A true infection was diagnosed in 11.6%. White blood cell count was increased in 16.2%, erythrocyte sedimentation rate increased in 33.3%, and C-reactive protein increased in 50.5%. The positive elaborate predictive value for these markers for infection was poor (18%, 21%, and 29%, respectively). These findings suggest that increased inflammatory laboratory values in patients with periprosthetic fracture are not good indicators for deep periprosthetic infection and do not necessarily warrant additional evaluations before definitive surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/sangre , Falla de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Neutrófilos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/complicacionesRESUMEN
The goal of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of physical examination in determining hip range of motion. Twenty normal hips, 21 hips with osteoarthritis, and 21 hips of patients more than 12 months after a total hip arthroplasty were examined for visual passive range of motion. These 62 hips were examined by 2 experienced surgeons and by 3 trainees. The 2 experienced examiners repeated their clinical examinations in 19 patients to determine the intraobserver reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate interobserver agreement in estimates of clinical hip motion (ICC for hip flexion, 0.56 +/- 0.12; for hip abduction, 0.48 +/- 0.13). Intraclass correlation coefficients also suggest only moderate intraobserver reliability in measurements of hip motion (ICC for hip flexion, 0.62 +/- 0.14; hip abduction, 0.44 +/- 0.20). More reliable and accurate methods are needed to measure clinical hip motion before and after total hip arthroplasty.
