Efficacy and safety of zuranolone in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of factor effect and dose-response analyses.

Background: Zuranolone is recognised as a promising antidepressant agent. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of zuranolone in treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching major databases from inception to August 20, 2023 (INPLASY: 202360087). A meta-analysis was performed by using a random-effects model to calculate effect sizes, expressed as standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptoms, while secondary outcomes included response and remission rates of depression, improvement in anxiety symptoms, incidence of dropouts, and any side effects. We conducted subgroup analyses for general MDD and postpartum-onset MDD and a dose-response meta-analysis to estimate the relationship between zuranolone dose and outcomes. Findings: The study included seven randomised control trials involving 1789 patients. Zuranolone reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.37, 95% CIs = -0.51 to -0.23), increased response rate (OR = 2.06, 95% CIs = 1.48-2.85) and remission rate (OR = 2.04, 95% CIs = 1.38-3.02), and reduced anxiety symptoms (SMD = -0.26, 95% CIs = -0.39 to -0.14). Furthermore, zuranolone-treated patients experienced more side effects than those in the control group (OR = 1.40, 95% CIs = 1.10-1.78), although dropout rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (OR = 1.13, 95% CIs = 0.85-1.49). According to the dose-response meta-analysis, zuranolone could effectively improve depression and anxiety at increasing doses up to a maximum daily dose of 30 mg; however, side effects increased with doses exceeding 30 mg. Based on subgroup analyses, zuranolone showed greater efficacy in treatment of postpartum-onset MDD than general MDD, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that zuranolone is effective in alleviating depression and anxiety. Nevertheless, there is a potential risk of adverse effects. Given its therapeutic efficacy and risk of side effects, a daily dose of 30 mg appears to be the optimal choice. Funding: Chang Gung Medical Foundation.

Incidence, prevalence and prescription patterns of antipsychotic medications use in Asia and US: A cross-nation comparison with common data model.

The use of antipsychotic medications (APMs) could be different among countries due to availability, approved indications, characteristics and clinical practice. However, there is limited literature providing comparisons of APMs use among countries. To examine trends in antipsychotic prescribing in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States, we conducted a cross-national study from 2002 to 2014 b y using the distributed network approach with common data model. We included all patients who had at least a record of antipsychotic prescription in this study, and defined patients without previous exposure of antipsychotics for 6 months before the index date as new users for incidence estimation. We calculated the incidence, prevalence, and prescription rate of each medication by calendar year. Among older patients, sulpiride was the most incident [incidence rate (IR) 11.0-23.3) and prevalent [prevalence rate (PR) 11.9-14.3) APM in Taiwan, and most prevalent (PR 2.5-3.9) in Japan. Quetiapine and haloperidol were most common in the United States (IR 8.1-9.5; PR 18.0-18.4) and Hong Kong (PR 8.8-13.7; PR 10.6-12.7), respectively. The trend of quetiapine use was increasing in Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States. As compared to older patients, the younger patients had more propensity to be prescribed second-generation APM for treatment in four countries. Trends in antipsychotic prescribing varied among countries. Quetiapine use was most prevalent in the United States and increasing in Taiwan and Hong Kong. The increasing use of quetiapine in the elderly patients might be due to its safety profile compared to other APMs.

Penetration of new antidiabetic medications in East Asian countries and the United States: A cross-national comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with diabetes is increasing particularly in Asia-Pacific region. Many of them are treated with antidiabetics. As the basis of the studies on the benefit and harm of antidiabetic drugs in the region, the information on patterns of market penetration of new classes of antidiabetic medications is important in providing context for subsequent research and analyzing and interpreting results. METHODS: We compared penetration patterns of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a random sample of the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System, the Japan Medical Data Center database, and a 5% random sample of the US Medicare database converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership's Common Data Model to identify new users of oral antidiabetic medications. We standardized prevalence and incidence rates of medication use by age and sex to those in the 2010 Taiwanese population. We compared age, sex, comorbid conditions, and concurrent medications between new users of DPP-4 inhibitors and biguanides. RESULTS: Use of DPP-4 inhibitors 1 year after market entry was highest in Japan and lowest in Hong Kong. New users had more heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and renal failure than biguanide users in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and the United States while the proportions were similar in Japan. In a country with low penetration of DPP-4 inhibitors (eg, Hong Kong), users had diabetes with multiple comorbid conditions compared with biguanidine users. In a country with high penetration (eg, Japan), the proportion of users with comorbid conditions was similar to that of biguanide users. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a marked difference of the penetration patterns of newly marketed antidiabetics in different countries in Asia. Those results will provide the basic information useful in the future studies.

Potential contribution of lifestyle and socioeconomic factors to healthy user bias in antihypertensives and lipid-lowering drugs.

OBJECTIVES: Healthy user bias arises when users of preventive medications such as lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs), hormone replacement therapy and antihypertensive (AH) medications are healthier than non-users due to factors other than medication effects, making the medications appear more beneficial in observational studies of effectiveness and safety. The purpose of the study is to examine factors contributing to healthy user effect in patients taking AHs or LLDs. METHODS: Among patients with hypertension or hyperlipidaemia in a population-based sample from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2010), we assessed the association between socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and the use of AHs/LLDs by logistic regression with adjustment for demographics and comorbidities in a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: When 9715 AH/LLD users were compared with 3725 non-users, AH/LLD users were more likely to be: highly educated (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.3), non-impoverished (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4), current non-smokers (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4), physically active (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2) and consume more calcium (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) but less likely to have normal body mass index (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.7) or to meet dietary sodium recommendations (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several salutary lifestyle factors associated with AH/LLD use in a representative US population. Healthy user effect may be partly explained by better socioeconomic profiles and lifestyles in AH/LLD users compared with non-users.