Computational Modeling of the Chlamydial Developmental Cycle Reveals a Potential Role for Asymmetric Division.

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium that progresses through an essential multicell form developmental cycle. Infection of the host is initiated by the elementary body (EB). Once in the host, the EB cell differentiates into the noninfectious, but replication-competent, reticulate body, or RB. After multiple rounds of replication, RBs undergo secondary differentiation, eventually producing newly infectious EBs. Here, we generated paired cell-type promoter reporter constructs and determined the kinetics of the activities of the euo, hctA, and hctB promoters. The paired constructs revealed that the developmental cycle produces at least three phenotypically distinct cell types, the RB (euoprom+), intermediate body (IB; hctAprom+), and EB (hctBprom+). The kinetic data from the three dual-promoter constructs were used to generate two computational agent-based models to reproduce the chlamydial developmental cycle. Both models simulated EB germination, RB amplification, IB formation, and EB production but differed in the mechanism that generated the IB. The direct conversion and the asymmetric production models predicted different behaviors for the RB population, which were experimentally testable. In agreement with the asymmetric production model, RBs acted as stem cells after the initial amplification stage, producing one IB and self-renewing after every division. We also demonstrated that IBs are a transient cell population, maturing directly into EBs after formation without the need for cell division. The culmination of these results suggests that the developmental cycle can be described by a four-stage model, EB germination, RB amplification/maturation, IB production, and EB formation. IMPORTANCE Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen responsible for both ocular and sexually transmitted infections. All Chlamydiae are reliant on a complex developmental cycle, consisting of both infectious and noninfectious cell forms. The EB cell form initiates infection, whereas the RB cell replicates. The infectious cycle requires both cell types, as RB replication increases the cell population while EB formation disseminates the infection to new hosts. The mechanisms of RB-to-EB development are largely unknown. Here, we developed unique dual promoter reporters and used live-cell imaging and confocal microscopy to visualize the cycle at the single-cell and kinetic levels. These data were used to develop and test two agent-based models, simulating either direct conversion of RBs to EBs or production of EBs via asymmetric RB division. Our results suggest that RBs mature into a stem cell-like population producing intermediate cell forms through asymmetric division, followed by maturation of the intermediate cell type into the infectious EB. Ultimately, a more complete mechanistic understanding of the developmental cycle will lead to novel therapeutics targeting cell type development to eliminate chlamydial dissemination.

The Obligate Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum Exploits Host Cell Multivesicular Body Biogenesis for Proliferation and Dissemination.

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the etiologic agent of the emerging infection, granulocytic anaplasmosis. This obligate intracellular bacterium lives in a host cell-derived vacuole that receives membrane traffic from multiple organelles to fuel its proliferation and from which it must ultimately exit to disseminate infection. Understanding of these essential pathogenic mechanisms has remained poor. Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are late endosomal compartments that receive biomolecules from other organelles and encapsulate them into intralumenal vesicles (ILVs) using endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery and ESCRT-independent machinery. Association of the ESCRT-independent protein, ALIX, directs MVBs to the plasma membrane where they release ILVs as exosomes. We report that the A. phagocytophilum vacuole (ApV) is acidified and enriched in lysobisphosphatidic acid, a lipid that is abundant in MVBs. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-III components along with ALIX localize to the ApV membrane. siRNA-mediated inactivation of ESCRT-0 and ALIX together impairs A. phagocytophilum proliferation and infectious progeny production. RNA silencing of ESCRT-III, which regulates ILV scission, pronouncedly reduces ILV formation in ApVs and halts infection by arresting bacterial growth. Rab27a and its effector Munc13-4, which drive MVB trafficking to the plasma membrane and subsequent exosome release, localize to the ApV. Treatment with Nexinhib20, a small molecule inhibitor that specifically targets Rab27a to block MVB exocytosis, abrogates A. phagocytophilum infectious progeny release. Thus, A. phagocytophilum exploits MVB biogenesis and exosome release to benefit each major stage of its intracellular infection cycle: intravacuolar growth, conversion to the infectious form, and exit from the host cell. IMPORTANCE Anaplasma phagocytophilum causes granulocytic anaplasmosis, a globally emerging zoonosis that can be severe, even fatal, and for which antibiotic treatment options are limited. A. phagocytophilum lives in an endosomal-like compartment that interfaces with multiple organelles and from which it must ultimately exit to spread within the host. How the bacterium accomplishes these tasks is poorly understood. Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are intermediates in the endolysosomal pathway that package biomolecular cargo from other organelles as intralumenal vesicles for release at the plasma membrane as exosomes. We discovered that A. phagocytophilum exploits MVB biogenesis and trafficking to benefit all aspects of its intracellular infection cycle: proliferation, conversion to its infectious form, and release of infectious progeny. The ability of a small molecule inhibitor of MVB exocytosis to impede A. phagocytophilum dissemination indicates the potential of this pathway as a novel host-directed therapeutic target for granulocytic anaplasmosis.

Translational gene expression control in Chlamydia trachomatis.

The human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis proceeds through a multi phenotypic developmental cycle with each cell form specialized for different roles in pathogenesis. Understanding the mechanisms regulating this complex cycle has historically been hampered by limited genetic tools. In an effort to address this issue, we developed a translational control system to regulate gene expression in Chlamydia using a synthetic riboswitch. Here we demonstrate that translational control via a riboswitch can be used in combination with a wide range of promoters in C. trachomatis. The synthetic riboswitch E, inducible with theophylline, was used to replace the ribosome binding site of the synthetic promoter T5-lac, the native chlamydial promoter of the pgp4 plasmid gene and an anhydrotetracycline responsive promoter. In all cases the riboswitch inhibited translation, and high levels of protein expression was induced with theophylline. Combining the Tet transcriptional inducible promoter with the translational control of the riboswitch resulted in strong repression and allowed for the cloning and expression of the potent chlamydial regulatory protein, HctB. The ability to control the timing and strength of gene expression independently from promoter specificity is a new and important tool for studying chlamydial regulatory and virulence genes.

Single-Inclusion Kinetics of Chlamydia trachomatis Development.

The obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis is reliant on a developmental cycle consisting of two cell forms, termed the elementary body (EB) and the reticulate body (RB). The EB is infectious and utilizes a type III secretion system and preformed effector proteins during invasion, but it does not replicate. The RB replicates in the host cell but is noninfectious. This developmental cycle is central to chlamydial pathogenesis. In this study, we developed mathematical models of the developmental cycle that account for potential factors influencing RB-to-EB cell type switching during infection. Our models predicted that two categories of regulatory signals for RB-to-EB development could be differentiated experimentally, an "intrinsic" cell-autonomous program inherent to each RB and an "extrinsic" environmental signal to which RBs respond. To experimentally differentiate between mechanisms, we tracked the expression of C. trachomatis development-specific promoters in individual inclusions using fluorescent reporters and live-cell imaging. These experiments indicated that EB production was not influenced by increased multiplicity of infection or by superinfection, suggesting the cycle follows an intrinsic program that is not directly controlled by environmental factors. Additionally, live-cell imaging revealed that EB development is a multistep process linked to RB growth rate and cell division. The formation of EBs followed a progression with expression from the euo and ihtA promoters evident in RBs, while expression from the promoter for hctA was apparent in early EBs/IBs. Finally, expression from the promoters for the true late genes, hctB, scc2, and tarp, was evident in the maturing EB.IMPORTANCE Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium that can cause trachoma, cervicitis, urethritis, salpingitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. To establish infection in host cells, Chlamydia must complete a multiple-cell-type developmental cycle. The developmental cycle consists of specialized cells, the EB cell, which mediates infection of new host cells, and the RB cell, which replicates and eventually produces more EB cells to mediate the next round of infection. By developing and testing mathematical models to discriminate between two competing hypotheses for the nature of the signal controlling RB-to-EB cell type switching, we demonstrate that RB-to-EB development follows a cell-autonomous program that does not respond to environmental cues. Additionally, we show that RB-to-EB development is a function of chlamydial growth and division. This study serves to further our understanding of the chlamydial developmental cycle that is central to the bacterium's pathogenesis.

Live-Cell Forward Genetic Approach to Identify and Isolate Developmental Mutants in Chlamydia trachomatis.

The intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis undergoes a developmental cycle consisting of two morphologically discrete developmental forms. The non-replicative elementary body (EB) initiates infection of the host. Once inside, the EB differentiates into the reticulate body (RB). The RB then undergoes multiple rounds of replication, before differentiating back to the infectious EB form. This cycle is essential for chlamydial survival as failure to switch between cell types prevents either host invasion or replication. Limitations in genetic techniques due to the obligate intracellular nature of Chlamydia have hampered identification of the molecular mechanisms involved in the cell-type development. We designed a novel dual promoter-reporter plasmid system that, in conjunction with live-cell microscopy, allows for the visualization of cell type switching in real time. To identify genes involved in the regulation of cell-type development, the live-cell promoter-reporter system was leveraged for the development of a forward genetic approach by combining chemical mutagenesis of the dual reporter strain, imaging and tracking of Chlamydia with altered developmental kinetics, followed by clonal isolation of mutants. This forward genetic workflow is a flexible tool that can be modified for directed interrogation into a wide range of genetic pathways.