Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Perinatol ; 40(10): 1462-1469, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632198

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pneumonia was firstly reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The disease had a rapid spread all over the word becoming an international public health emergency. Limited data were available on COVID-19 positive neonates. We reviewed relevant literature to understand the clinical course of disease and transmission routes in affected neonates. The aim of the study was evaluating the clinical course and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 positive neonates. Based on current literature, the hypothesis of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2, though conceivable, remains unproven. A research conducted on PubMed database from December 2019 to April 27, 2020 revealed that were reported 25 neonates affected by SARS-CoV-2. Main symptoms were fever, cough, or shortness of breath but often these neonates did not show other symptoms during length stay in hospital. No deaths occurred.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/fisiopatología , Control de Infecciones , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(2): 243-251, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430239

RESUMEN

Measles outbreaks were recently reported in Europe due to low immunization rates. In this scenario, identifying the reasons of no vaccination is crucial to set up strategies to improve immunization rate. A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the determinants of missed vaccination in children living in Southern Italy, during the 2016 outbreak. A standardized face-to-face questionnaire was used to record demographic data, immunization status, and reasons for missed vaccination. A total of 1141 children (median age 86 months, male 47.2%) was enrolled, 77.8% of the children were adequately vaccinated for age, 6.3% were incompletely vaccinated for age, and 15.9% did not receive any vaccine dose. Vaccination rate and reasons for not vaccinating significantly varied according to age, with children ≤ 24 months showing the lowest rate (67.8%). Reasons for not vaccinating included fear for side effects (51%), presence of underlying chronic conditions (12.2%), skip scheduled appointment (12.2%), refusal of vaccination (10.3%), acute illnesses (7.2%), and allergy to eggs (4.6%). The presence of underlying condition was a risk factor for inadequate immunization (p < 0.0001). Only 4.7% of conditions were true contraindications to vaccine administration.Conclusion: We reported inadequate measles immunization rate in Southern Italy, with lowest rates in children ≤ 2 years or with underlying conditions. Only a minority had true contraindications to vaccine uptake. Implementation strategies addressed to health-care professionals and families should focus on the reported determinants to increase measles vaccination coverage. What is Known: • Measles is a viral, highly communicable disease, preventable by vaccine. • Measles elimination in Europe failed as demonstrated by outbreaks in several countries, due to low immunization rates. What is New: • Inadequate measles immunization rate due to false contraindications in Southern Italy, with lowest rates in children ≤ 2 years. • The presence of underlying disease is a risk factor for inadequate immunization.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna Antisarampión/administración & dosificación , Sarampión/prevención & control , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Sarampión/epidemiología , Vacuna Antisarampión/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
3.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 43(3): 412-418, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30251268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Food aversion (FA) is an eating behavior where children refuse solid or fluid intake. FA can compromise the weaning off parenteral nutrition (PN) in children with intestinal failure (IF), reducing their quality of life (QoL). Around 25% of children with IF experience FA, but few data are available on interventions to get over FA. Messy play therapy (MPT) uses sensory activities to provide another meaningful avenue for learning in children by creating a fun way to experience new textures. This study aims to assess the efficacy of MPT in FA. METHODS: Demographic data and MPT intervention were retrospectively recorded between 2004 and 2017. Food was categorized by tastes and textures. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range (25%-75%). RESULTS: Twelve children were identified. MPT was started at 9 (6-16) months with an enrolling time within the program of 10.11 (7.75-12.5) months. MPT was ended after 19.5 (16.75-28.5) months, and all patients achieved tolerance to oral diet. Significant improvement in savory (P = .001), sweet (P = .002), and mixed texture (P = .001) of food intake was reported. Better QoL and mealtimes with family were reported at median follow-up of 39 (24-56) months. CONCLUSIONS: MPT seems to be a positive intervention to overcome FA. In our experience, the children have gone from not tolerating any intake to tolerating an oral diet, which means enjoying their mealtimes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MPT in a larger scale of patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/complicaciones , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , Enfermedades Intestinales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Intestinales/psicología , Nutrición Parenteral/psicología , Ludoterapia/métodos , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Conducta del Lactante/psicología , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Masculino , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 15: 329, 2015 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265328

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite consistent recommendations by all Public Health Authorities in support of annual influenza vaccination for at-risk categories, there is still a low uptake of influenza vaccine in these groups including health care workers (HCWs). Aim of this observational two-phase study was to estimate the immunization rates for influenza in four subsequent seasons and for pandemic H1N1 influenza in HCWs of a University Hospital, and to investigate its distribution pattern and the main determinants of immunization. Phase 1 data collection was performed in 2009-2010, during the peak of H1N1 pandemic. Phase 2 data collection, aimed to investigate seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in the three seasons after pandemic, was performed in 2012-2013. METHODS: The overall H1N1 vaccination rate was derived by the Hospital immunization registry. In 2010, the personnel of three Departments (Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics and Gynecology/Obstetrics) completed a survey on influenza. A second-phase analysis was performed in 2012 to investigate influenza vaccination coverage in three consecutive seasons. RESULTS: The first-phase survey showed a low coverage for influenza in all categories (17 %), with the lowest rate in nurses (8.1 %). A total of 37 % of health care workers received H1N1 vaccine, with the highest rate among physicians and the lowest in nurses. H1N1 vaccination was closely related to the Department, being higher in the Department of Infectious Diseases (53.7 %) and Pediatrics (42.4 %) than in Gynecology/Obstetrics (8.3 %). The second-phase survey showed the lowest rate of influenza vaccination in 2012/13 season. The main reasons for not being vaccinated were "Unsure of the efficacy of vaccine" and "Feel not at-risk of getting influenza or its complications". Despite recommendations, influenza vaccine uptake remains poor. CONCLUSION: Immunization is largely perceived as a personal protection rather than a measure needed to prevent disease spreading to at-risk patients. Compulsory vaccination against influenza should be considered as a possible strategy, at least in health institutions where at-risk patients are admitted.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
Ital J Pediatr ; 39: 81, 2013 Dec 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24373709

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An increased but unpredictable risk of malnutrition is associated with hospitalization, especially in children with chronic diseases. We investigated the applicability of Screening Tool for Risk of Impaired Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids), an instrument proposed to estimate the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized children. We also evaluated the role of age and co-morbidities as risk for malnutrition. METHODS: The STRONGkids consists of 4 items providing a score that classifies a patient in low, moderate, high risk for malnutrition. A prospective observational multi-centre study was performed in 12 Italian hospitals. Children 1-18 years consecutively admitted and otherwise unselected were enrolled. Their STRONGkids score was obtained and compared with the actual nutritional status expressed as BMI and Height for Age SD-score. RESULTS: Of 144 children (75 males, mean age 6.5 ± 4.5 years), 52 (36%) had an underlying chronic disease. According to STRONGkids, 46 (32%) children were at low risk, 76 (53%) at moderate risk and 22 (15%) at high risk for malnutrition. The latter had significantly lower Height for Age values (mean SD value -1.07 ± 2.08; p = 0.008) and BMI values (mean SD-values -0.79 ± 2.09; p = 0.0021) in comparison to other groups. However, only 29 children were actually malnourished. CONCLUSIONS: The STRONGkids is easy to administer. It is highly sensitive but not specific. It may be used as a very preliminary screening tool to be integrated with other clinical data in order to reliably predict the risk of malnutrition.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Evaluación Nutricional , Factores de Edad , Antropometría , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Desnutrición/terapia , Estado Nutricional , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...