Use of the Limbs and Things Hysterectomy Model to Describe the Process for Establishing Validity.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the process for establishing or refuting validity for the Limbs and Things hysterectomy model. DESIGN: Prospective study using Kane's framework for establishing validity (Canadian Task Force classification: II-2). SETTING: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) assessments completed in the operating room (OR) and simulation at 3 academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 26 postgraduate years 3-4), a gynecologic oncology fellow (postgraduate year 5), and a gynecology oncology attending. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were rated with the myTIPreport feedback application by nonblinded faculty in the OR after TLH. In-person, simulation-based assessments were provided by 2 faculty members blinded to experience level using myTIPreport and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Videos of simulated TLHs were rated by 2 minimally invasive gynecology fellows. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: OR scores for TLH steps were significantly higher than simulation assessments (p < .001) with "competent" marked more frequently in the OR. Number of robotic + conventional TLHs performed as primary surgeon was not significantly correlated with OR myTIPreport rating (Spearman r = .30, p = .14) but was significantly correlated with myTIPreport and GOALS in-person simulation ratings (Spearman r = .39-.58, p = .001-.04). Agreement between in-person simulation rater 1 and 2 myTIPreport assessments was 71.4% (weighted κ, .68; 95% confidence interval, .45-.90), and intraclass correlation for the GOALS overall assessment was .71 (95% confidence interval, .46-.85), indicating substantial agreement. Blinded video reviews showed similar agreement (73.1%) between raters but less correlation with experience (Spearman r = .32-.42, p = .11-.03) than in-person reviews. Using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, mean score for the individual components of GOALS that best differentiated myTIPreport noncompetent and competent levels of performance was 4.3. Feedback acceptability and model realism were rated highly. CONCLUSION: The scoring and generalization validity inferences for Limbs and Things and myTIPreport are supported when global assessments of performance are evaluated but not for individual components of the assessment instruments.

Correlation of sociodemographic and clinical parameters with depression and distress in patients with hematologic malignancies.

A quarter of cancer patients struggle with distress or depression during their illness. Multiple organizations including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend universal screening for distress and depression. Herein, we describe a universal screening program in patients with hematologic malignancies and factors associated with distress and depression. Between December 2013 and February 2015, patients with hematologic malignancies took the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and Distress Thermometer (DT) prior to receiving their first outpatient parenteral chemotherapy. Patient demographic information as well as information regarding visit burden and baseline use of psychiatric medications were recorded. A PHQ-9 score of ≥ 9 and a DT score ≥ 4 suggested a high risk of major depression and distress. Intergroup comparisons of categorical and continuous variables were performed via chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariate models were constructed using the stepwise selection technique using all potential variables. Two hundred forty-six patients with a median age at diagnosis 65 years (range 18-94 years) were included. In the multivariate analysis, a PHQ-9 score ≥ 9 was associated with living alone (P = 0.007), positive PHQ-2 (P = 0.003), and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; P = 0.02), while a DT score ≥ 4 was associated with being married (P = 0.03) and female (P = 0.03). There was no other association with high scores on either questionnaire. Patients with hematologic malignancies often have prolonged treatment and surveillance. We identified subpopulations within this group who may be at high risk of developing distress and depression and who should be aggressively screened even when universal screening programs are not available.

Demographic Characteristics and Prescribing Patterns of Scleral Lens Fitters: The SCOPE Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports demographic characteristics of scleral lens providers and indications for scleral lens prescription as assessed by a worldwide online survey. METHODS: The Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice: an Evaluation (SCOPE) study group designed the online survey regarding current scleral lens prescription and management practices. The Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center administered the survey, which was open from January 15 to March 31, 2015. Data from 989 responses were collated by the Survey Research Center and deidentified before analysis. Responses of individuals who had fit at least five patients with scleral lenses were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: Most lens fitters were men (61%, n=800). Of survey respondents, 29% were 25 to 34 years; 22%, 35 to 44 years; 22%, 45 to 54 years; and 26%, more than 55 years (n=806). For 29% of all respondents, professional training was completed between 2009 and 2014 (n=804). Most (54%) fit their first patient between 2010 and 2015, with the earliest lens fit reported in 1956 (n=634). Most respondents (63%) worked primarily in private, group, or retail practice (n=811). Scleral lenses were most often prescribed for corneal irregularity (74%), followed by ocular surface disease (16%) and uncomplicated refractive error (10%) (n=673). CONCLUSIONS: Eye care providers of all ages are fitting scleral lenses. The number of individuals who fit this lens modality has increased during the past decade. Scleral lenses are being fit by providers in a wide range of practice settings. Most scleral lenses are prescribed for corneal irregularity.

Scleral Lens Prescription and Management Practices: The SCOPE Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess current scleral lens prescription and management practices by conducting an international online survey of eye care providers. METHODS: The SCOPE (Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice: an Evaluation) study group designed and administered an online survey regarding current scleral lens prescription and management practices. The survey was open from January 15 to March 31, 2015, and generated 723 responses from individuals who had fit at least 5 patients with scleral lenses. RESULTS: Respondents (n=663) prescribed scleral lenses that ranged from 15 to 17 mm in diameter (65%), smaller than 15 mm (18%), and larger than 18 mm (17%). More than 50 lens designs were identified. Average daily wearing time of 11.8 hr was consistent across 651 respondents, and 475/651 (73%) recommended midday removal on some, most, or all days. Most respondents recommended nonpreserved saline to fill the bowl of the lens before application (single-use vials, 392/653 [60%]; bottled products, 372/653 [57%]). A hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection system was the most commonly recommended care product (397/651 [61%]). CONCLUSIONS: A reasonable degree of consensus exists regarding some aspects of scleral lens prescription and management (average lens diameter, daily wearing time, and use of nonpreserved products for lens application). Further study is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for scleral lens prescription and management.

Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported distress (PRD) has not been well assessed in association with survival after radiation therapy (RT). The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between PRD level and survival after definitive RT and to identify the main causes of distress in definitive RT patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 678 consecutive patients receiving definitive RT at our institution from April 2012 through May 2015 were included. All patients answered a PRD questionnaire that contained 30 items related to possible causes of distress, which could be rated from 1 (no distress) to 5 (high distress). Additionally, patients were asked to rate their overall distress level from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). This overall distress level was our primary patient-reported distress measure and was examined as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable with 3 PRD levels (low, 0-3 [n = 295]; moderate, 4-6 [n = 222]; and high, 7-10 [n = 161]). RESULTS: As a continuous variable in multivariable Cox regression analysis, a higher overall PRD level was associated with poorer survival after RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; P = .004). As a categorical variable, compared with patients with low distress, survival was poorer for patients with moderate distress (HR, 1.62; P = .038) or high distress (HR, 1.49; P = .12), but the latter difference was not significant. When the moderate and high distress levels were combined, survival was significantly poorer compared with the low distress level (HR, 1.57; P = .034). The top 5 specific causes of distress that patients mentioned were "How I feel during treatment," "Fatigue," "Out-of-pocket medical costs," "Pain that affects my daily functioning," and "Sleep difficulties." CONCLUSIONS: PRD before or during RT is a prognostic factor associated with decreased survival. Distress screening guidelines and interventions should be implemented for patients receiving definitive RT.

Colonoscopy bowel preparation quality improvement for patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparations can necessitate early repeat of colonoscopy and increased healthcare costs. Established risk factors for suboptimal bowel preparation are known, yet data are lacking in the specific subgroup of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The primary aim of this study was to reduce inadequate bowel preparation rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplant via a quality improvement initiative targeting patient education. METHODS: A total of 121 patients undergoing evaluation at our institution prior to implementation of the quality improvement initiative and 91 patients undergoing evaluation after implementation were included. The initiative was an educational intervention via a 6-minute colonoscopy and split-prep bowel preparation educational video during the initial liver transplantation evaluation visit for all patients with scheduled colonoscopy. RESULTS: Inadequate bowel preparation was observed in 36 patients (29.8%) in the pre-intervention period compared to 29 patients (31.9%) in the post-intervention period. This corresponded to a lack of a significant difference in both single-variable analysis and multivariable analysis. Of note, there was a significantly higher rate of inadequate bowel preparation as ascites worsened (P=.028). CONCLUSION: Patient educational video failed to improve bowel preparations in patients undergoing colonoscopy with decompensated cirrhosis.