Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 115(1): 36-41, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885401

RESUMEN

Better therapies for childhood cancer remain an unmet need to improve the dismal prognosis of certain malignancies and to reduce the burden of toxicity. Rescuing discontinued or shelved drugs for children, adolescents, and young adults is a strategy to identify new uses for approved or investigational medicines outside the scope of their original medical indication. Our proposed multistakeholder consensus focuses on the development of innovative, patent-protected targeted agents, sourced from previously shelved or discontinued programs that have the potential to provide significant benefit to underserved patient populations, with unmet medical needs. There are several challenges to continuing/rescuing drugs for pediatric oncology development, which include the lack of information for decision making, corporate strategy considerations underlying the decision to invest in pediatric development, and the contracting and technology transfer complexities required to enable divestment and subsequent development. The multistakeholder approach for drug development has the advantage of conveying a consensus among academia, patient advocates, and importantly industry itself. We propose three areas of action to facilitate rescuing potentially beneficial drugs for children and adolescents with cancer: (i) initiatives to provide information to companies considering developing these drugs and a standards framework; (ii) incentives both in Europe and in the United States to encourage companies to develop pediatric-only drugs, with the reform of the EU Pharmaceutical Legislation posing an important opportunity; and (iii) communication of the issues to all stakeholders. Ultimately, this will benefit children and adolescents with cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Niño , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Consenso , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Oncología Médica , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos
2.
Clin Transl Sci ; 12(4): 334-342, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30884199

RESUMEN

Testing novel drugs on fellow human beings is fraught with potential ethical concerns; however, developing drugs to treat the wide spectrum of human diseases and disorders is a moral imperative. How do we best navigate the balance between protecting the individual vs. the greater good? Global government regulatory bodies are accountable for ensuring that medical experiments on human subjects are appropriately justified and subject to close oversight. In this article, we focus on two major global health authorities, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the path to legally treating humans with new investigational products.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aplicación de Nuevas Drogas en Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control Social Formal , Europa (Continente) , Experimentación Humana/ética , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 110: 74-85, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30772656

RESUMEN

Paediatric Strategy Forums have been created by the multistakeholder organisation, ACCELERATE, and the European Medicines Agency to facilitate dialogue between all relevant stakeholders and suggest strategies in critical areas of paediatric oncology drug development. As there are many medicines being developed for B-cell malignancies in adults but comparatively few in children with these malignancies, a Paediatric Strategy Forum was held to discuss the best approach to develop these products for children. It was concluded that as current frontline therapy is highly successful, despite associated acute toxicity, de-escalation of this or substitution of presently used drugs with new medicines can only be undertaken when there is an effective salvage regimen, which is currently not available. Therefore priority should be given to developing treatment for patients with relapsed and refractory mature B-cell lymphomas. The consensus of the clinicians attending the meeting was that CAR T-cells, T-cell engagers and antibody drug conjugates (excluding those with a vinca alkaloid-like drug) presently have the greatest probability of providing benefit in relapse in view of their mechanism of action. However, as producing autologous CAR T-cells currently takes at least 4 weeks, they are not products which could be quickly employed initially at relapse in rapidly progressing mature B-cell malignancies but only for the consolidation phase of the treatment. Global, industry-supported, academic-sponsored studies testing compounds from different pharmaceutical companies simultaneously should be considered in rare populations, and it was proposed that an international working group be formed to develop an overarching clinical trials strategy for these disease groups. Future Forums are planned for other relevant paediatric oncologic diseases with a high unmet medical need and relevant molecular targets.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Linfocitos B/efectos de los fármacos , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , América del Norte , Planificación de Atención al Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...