Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Res ; 264: 222-229, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33838406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in selected trauma patients is associated with potential benefits. This study evaluates the real-world outcomes of SSRF since its implementation at Westmead Hospital, Australia. We hypothesize these outcomes to be similar to that reported by best-evidence in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data on all consecutive SSRF performed between January 2013 to December 2018 was completed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (54 male; average age 55.9 ± 14.1 y) with median ISS 24 (IQR 17;30) underwent SSRF. Thirty-seven patients were admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), with median ICU length of stay (LOS) 10.0 (5.0-17.0) d. Median hospital LOS was 15.5 (10.0-24.8) d. Fifty-five (87.3%) patients did not have any surgery-specific complications. The highest observed surgical morbidity was wound infection (n = 4, 4.7%). There was one mortality after rib fixation that was not related to surgery. SSRF within 3 d of hospital presentation in ventilated patients with flail chest was associated with significantly reduced median ICU LOS (3.0 [2.0;4.0] versus 10.0 [9.3;13.0] d; P = 0.03). Early (2013-2015) versus late (2015-2018) phase SSRF implementation demonstrated no significant difference in outcome variables. CONCLUSION: Experience with SSRF demonstrates early outcomes similar to best-evidence in the existing literature. As a quality assurance tool, ongoing evaluation of real-world data is needed to ensure that outcomes remain consistent with benchmarks available from best-evidence.


Asunto(s)
Tórax Paradójico/terapia , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Placas Óseas , Femenino , Tórax Paradójico/etiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 91(4): 590-596, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Day-only laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DOLC) has been shown to be safe and feasible yet has not been widely implemented in Australia. This study explores the introduction of routine DOLC to Westmead Hospital, and highlights the barriers to its implementation. METHODS: Routine day-only cholecystectomy protocol was introduced at Westmead Hospital in 2014. A retrospective review of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a 12-month period in 2014 was compared to a 12-month period in 2018, to examine the changes in practice after implementation of a unit protocol. Data were collected on patient demographics, admission category, outcomes and re-presentations. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients were included in the study, of these 169 were booked as day procedures, with 124 (73%) successfully discharged on the same day. There was a significant increase in the proportion of patients booked as day-only from 2014 to 2018 (48% versus 73%, P < 0.001). Day-only failure rates (unplanned overnight admissions), readmissions and complication rates were comparable between the two periods. The most common reason for unplanned overnight admissions were due to intraoperative findings (n = 28/45). CONCLUSION: Routine DOLC can be adopted in Australian hospitals without compromise to patient safety. Unplanned overnight admission is predominantly due to unexpected surgical pathology and can be reduced by protocols for the use of drains and planned outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Unplanned outpatient review can be minimized by optimizing both intra- and post-operative pain management. Individual surgeon and anaesthetist preferences remain an obstacle to a standardized protocol in the Australian setting.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Australia/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2019(3): rjz055, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30886693

RESUMEN

Amyand's hernia is a rare type of hernia where the appendix is found within the hernial sac. We present a case of appendicitis within an Amyand's hernia in a 72-year-old man who presented with a acutely painful, irreducible right inguinal lump. He underwent open appendicectomy and primary tissue repair with subsequent delayed elective mesh hernioplasty 3 months later.

7.
Rare Tumors ; 5(3): e38, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179650

RESUMEN

We report a 41-year old male who presented to the Emergency Department after falling while water-skiing. He had a previous medical history included chronic headaches, which had persisted for the last 2-3 months prior to presentation. Computed tomography of the head showed a small hypersensitivity with a small extra axial collection with a maximum thickness of 1mm. Differential diagnoses included an arachnoid cyst, haemangioma, meningioma or a secondary lesion. A diagnosis of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis was made based on the histopathology examination and the immunoperoxidase staining.

8.
World J Surg ; 36(9): 2202-9, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of secondary bile acids after gallstone disease and cholecystectomy are believed to increase the risk of colorectal cancer. It remains unclear whether there is a similar risk of developing adenomas. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the risk of developing colonic adenomas following gallstone disease or cholecystectomy. METHODS: The study was based on a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents (1950-2012). Selection criteria were developed to sort for studies exploring the relationship between cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and colonic adenoma in an adult population. A random-effects model was used to generate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 1,276 studies identified, 14 were suitable for final analysis. There were 253,059 subjects in total, 42,543 of whom were diagnosed with colonic adenoma, and 28,281 of whom had gallstones or underwent cholecystectomy. There was a significant risk of developing colonic adenoma if gallstones were present (OR = 2.26; 95 % CI = 1.83-2.81). A risk was also seen with cholecystectomy (OR = 1.15; 95 % CI = 1.04-1.26), but this risk was negated when only adjusted odds were selected (OR = 1.01; 95 % CI = 0.91-1.12). No publication bias and only low levels of heterogeneity existed. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones increase the risk of colonic adenoma. No association exists with cholecystectomy.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/etiología , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Ácidos y Sales Biliares/análisis , Pólipos del Colon/etiología , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Humanos
9.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 47(5): 553-64, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22369489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of secondary bile acids after cholecystectomy and cholelithiasis are believed to increase the risk of colorectal cancer, and several studies have suggested that the risk of colorectal cancer may be the greatest proximally. Numerous conflicting studies have been published and it remains unclear whether the risk is apparent in the rectum. This meta-analysis aims to determine the risk of developing rectal cancer following gallstone disease or cholecystectomy. METHODS: The prospective protocol included a literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents (1950-2011). Selection criteria were developed to sort for studies exploring the relationship between cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and rectal cancer in an adult population. A random-effects model was used to generate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2358 studies identified, 42 were suitable for final analysis. There were 1,547,506 subjects in total, 14,226 diagnosed with rectal cancer, and 496,552 with gallstones or cholecystectomy. There was a statistically significant risk of rectal cancer following cholelithiasis (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.02-1.73), though no risk was apparent following cholecystectomy (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.92-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Cholelithiasis increases the risk of rectal cancer. No association exists between cholecystectomy and rectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Intervalos de Confianza , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...