Effects of intraocular pressure change on intraocular lens power calculation in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

This study aimed to assess the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes on biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). This prospective non-randomized cohort study enrolled patients with diagnosed POAG and OHT, presenting with IOP levels exceeding 25 mmHg. Thai Clinical Trials Registry number was TCTR20180912007. Optical biometry, encompassing measurements such as corneal thickness (CCT), keratometry, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length, was conducted before and after IOP reduction. The IOL power was also determined using the SRK/T formula. The main outcomes measured were alterations in biometry and IOL power. Correlations between IOP, biometric parameters, and IOL power were analyzed. In total, 28 eyes were included in the study, with a mean patient age of 65.71±10.2 years. After IOP reduction, all biometric parameters, except CCT and ACD, exhibited a decrease without reaching statistical significance (all p>0.05). Meanwhile, IOL power showed a slight increase of 0.214±0.42 diopters (P = 0.035). The correlation between IOP and biometric parameters was found to be weak. However, there was a moderate correlation between IOP and IOL power (r2 = 0.267). Notably, IOL power tended to increase by more than 0.5 diopters when IOP decreased by more than 10 mmHg (p < 0.001). In conclusion, changes in IOP among patients with POAG and OHT do not significantly impact biometry and IOL power calculations. Nonetheless, it may be prudent to consider a slight adjustment in IOL power when IOP is lowered by more than 10 mmHg.

Comparative analysis of long-term results of three epithelial cell transplantation procedures for treating limbal stem cell deficiency.

This study compared the long-term outcome of different epithelial transplantation techniques to treat limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). We conducted a retrospective 15-year comparative systematic cohort study of patients with LSCD who underwent either cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET), simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), or cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET). We reviewed the demographic data, etiology, LSCD severity, best-corrected visual acuity, surgical outcomes, and complications. A total of 103 eyes of 94 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 16.4 years) with LSCD were enrolled. The most common cause of LSCD was chemical injury (42.7 %). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The success rates of CLET, SLET, and COMET were 45.5 %, 77.8 %, and 57.8 %, respectively. The 7-year survival rates after CLET, SLET, and COMET were 50.0 %, 72.2 %, and 53.2 %, respectively. Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) had a significantly lower survival rate than other causes (p < 0.001), but SLET had a significantly higher survival rate than CLET (p = 0.018) and COMET (p = 0.047). Visual improvement of more than four Snellen lines was achieved in 53.1 % of successful cases and 28.2 % of failed cases. SJS, Schirmer I test <5 mm, and the presence of postoperative recurrent epithelial defects were significant risk factors for a failed surgery. All epithelial transplantation techniques had favorable long-term surgical outcomes. More than half of the patients achieved a stable ocular surface and visual acuity improvement up to 7 years postoperatively. SLET tends to have a better surgical outcome than CLET and COMET, especially in patients with SJS.