Commercially available tests for determining cefiderocol susceptibility display variable performance in the Achromobacter genus.

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature. METHODS: Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species. RESULTS: None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains.

Cefiderocol susceptibility of Achromobacter spp.: study of an accurately identified collection of 230 strains.

BACKGROUND: Achromobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens, mostly infecting immunocompromised patients and patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered as difficult-to-treat pathogens due to both intrinsic resistance and the possibility of acquired antimicrobial resistance. Species identification remains challenging leading to imprecise descriptions of resistance in each taxon. Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum siderophore cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections for which susceptibility data remain scarce. We aimed to describe the susceptibility to cefiderocol of a collection of Achromobacter strains encompassing different species and isolation sources from CF or non-CF (NCF) patients. METHODS: We studied 230 Achromobacter strains (67 from CF, 163 from NCF patients) identified by nrdA gene-based analysis, with available susceptibility data for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefiderocol were determined using the broth microdilution reference method according to EUCAST guidelines. RESULTS: Strains belonged to 15 species. A. xylosoxidans represented the main species (71.3%). MICs ranged from ≤ 0.015 to 16 mg/L with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L overall and 0.125/2 mg/L against 27 (11.7%) meropenem-non-susceptible strains. Cefiderocol MICs were not related to CF/NCF origin or species although A. xylosoxidans MICs were statistically lower than those of other species considered as a whole. Considering the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint (2 mg/L), 228 strains (99.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. The two cefiderocol-resistant strains (A. xylosoxidans from CF patients) represented 3.7% of meropenem-non-susceptible strains and 12.5% of MDR strains. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol exhibited excellent in vitro activity against a large collection of accurately identified Achromobacter strains, irrespective of species and origin.

Multisystemic Effects of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis and Advanced Lung Disease.

Rationale: Limited data exist on the safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and advanced lung disease. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of ETI in an unselected population of pwCF and advanced lung disease. Methods: A prospective observational study, including all adults aged 18 years and older with percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) ⩽ 40 who initiated ETI from December 2019 to June 2021 in France, was conducted. PwCF were followed until August 8, 2022. Results: ETI was initiated in 434 pwCF with a median ppFEV1 of 30 (interquartile range, 25-35), including 27 with severe cystic fibrosis liver disease and 183 with diabetes. PwCF were followed for a median of 587 (interquartile range, 396-728) days after ETI initiation. Discontinuation of ETI occurred in 12 (2.8%) pwCF and was due mostly to lung transplantation (n = 5) or death (n = 4). Absolute increase in ppFEV1 by a mean of +14.2% (95% confidence interval, 13.1-15.4%) occurred at 1 month and persisted throughout the study. Increase in ppFEV1 in the youngest age quartile was almost twice that of the oldest quartile (P < 0.001); body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 was found in 38.6% at initiation versus 11.3% at 12 months (P = 0.0001). Increases in serum concentrations of vitamins A and E, but not 25-hydroxy vitamin D3, were observed. Significant reductions in the percentages of pwCF using oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, nutritional support, and inhaled and systemic therapies (including antibiotics) were observed; insulin was discontinued in 12% of patients with diabetes. Conclusions: ETI is safe in pwCF and advanced lung disease, with multisystem pulmonary and extrapulmonary benefits.

COBRAPed cohort: Do sensitization patterns differentiate children with severe asthma from those with a milder disease?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether sensitization patterns differentiate children with severe recurrent wheeze (SRW)/severe asthma (SA) from those with non-severe recurrent wheeze (NSRW)/non-severe asthma (NSA). Our objective was to determine whether sensitization patterns can discriminate between children from the French COBRAPed cohort with NSRW/NSA and those with SRW/SA. METHODS: IgE to 112 components (c-sIgE) (ImmunoCAP® ISAC) were analyzed in 125 preschools (3-6 years) and 170 school-age children (7-12 years). Supervised analyses and clustering methods were applied to identify patterns of sensitization among children with positive c-sIgE. RESULTS: We observed c-sIgE sensitization in 51% of preschool and 75% of school-age children. Sensitization to house dust mite (HDM) components was more frequent among NSRW than SRW (53% vs. 24%, p < .01). Sensitization to non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) components was more frequent among SA than NSA (16% vs. 4%, p < .01) and associated with an FEV1/FVC < -1.64 z-score. Among sensitized children, seven clusters with varying patterns were identified. The two broader clusters identified in each age group were characterized by "few sensitizations, mainly to HDM." One cluster (n = 4) with "multiple sensitizations, mainly to grass pollen, HDM, PR-10, and nsLTP" was associated with SA in school-age children. CONCLUSIONS: Although children with wheeze/asthma display frequent occurrences and high levels of sensitization, sensitization patterns did not provide strong signals to discriminate children with severe disease from those with milder disease. These results suggest that the severity of wheeze/asthma may depend on both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated mechanisms.