Gut resistome of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.

Background: The newest method of treatment for patients with NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) is immunotherapy directed at the immune checkpoints PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death 1) and PD-L1 (Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1). PD-L1 is the only validated predictor factor for immunotherapy efficacy, but it is imperfect. Some patients do not benefit from immunotherapy and may develop primary or secondary resistance. This study aimed to assess the intestinal resistome composition of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the context of clinical features and potentially new prediction factors for assessing immunotherapy efficacy. Methods: The study included 30 advanced NSCLC patients, 19 (57%) men and 11 (33%) women treated with first- or second-line immunotherapy (nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). We evaluated the patient's gut resistome composition using the high sensitivity of targeted metagenomics. Results: Studies have shown that resistome richness is associated with clinical and demographic factors of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Smoking seems to be associated with an increased abundance of macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins and vancomycin core resistome. The resistome of patients with progression disease appears to be more abundant and diverse, with significantly higher levels of genomic markers of resistance to lincosamides (lnuC). The resistance genes lnuC, msrD, ermG, aph(6), fosA were correlated with progression-free survival or/and overall survival, thus may be considered as factors potentially impacting the disease. Conclusion: The results indicate that the intestinal resistome of NSCLC patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment differs depending on the response to immunotherapy, with several distinguished markers. Since it might impact treatment efficacy, it must be examined more deeply.

The influence of nutritional status, lipid profile, leptin concentration and polymorphism of genes encoding leptin and neuropeptide Y on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropeptide Y is a neurotransmitter in the nervous system and belongs to the orexigenic system that increases appetite. Its excessive secretion leads to obesity. Leptin is a pro-inflammatory adipokine (produced in adipose tissue) induced in obesity and may mediate increased antitumor immunity in obesity (including the promotion of M1 macrophages). Leptin and neuropeptide Y gene polymorphisms, causing increased leptin levels and the occurrence of obesity, and lipid profile disorders, may increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 121 patients with advanced NSCLC without mutations in the EGFR gene and rearrangements of the ALK and ROS1 genes, undergoing immunotherapy (1st and 2nd line of treatment) or chemoimmunotherapy (1st line of treatment), we assessed BMI, lipid profile, PD-L1 expression on cancer cells using the immunohistochemical method (clone SP263 antibody), leptin concentration in blood serum by ELISA, polymorphisms in the promoter region of the genes for leptin (LEP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Leptin concentration was significantly higher in obese patients than in patients with normal or low weight (p = 0.00003) and in patients with disease stabilization compared to patients with progression observed during immunotherapy (p = 0.012). Disease control occurred significantly more often in patients with the GA or AA genotype than patients with the GG genotype in the rs779039 polymorphism of the LEP gene. The median PFS in the entire study group was five months (95% CI: 3-5.5), and the median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 8-16). Median PFS was highest in patients with TPS ≥ 50% (6.5 months) and in obese patients (6.6 months). Obese patients also had a slightly longer median OS compared to other patients (23.8 vs. 13 months). The multivariate Cox logistic regression test showed that the only factor reducing the risk of progression was TPS ≥ 50% (HR = 0.6068, 95% CI: 0.4001-0.9204, p = 0, 0187), and the only factor reducing the risk of death was high leptin concentration (HR = 0.6743, 95% CI: 0.4243-1.0715, p = 0.0953). CONCLUSION: Assessment of nutritional status, serum leptin concentration and polymorphisms in the LEP gene may be of additional importance in predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

MicroRNA-126 selected with broad-spectrum analysis of microRNAs - a new predictive factor for the effectiveness of immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients?

Introduction: Expression of PD-L1 on cancer cells is the only validated predictive factor for immunotherapy in NSCLC (Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer) patients. However, on this basis, it is difficult to predict the occurrence of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MicroRNAs are widely studied as biomarkers of cancers. Our study was designed to determine whether microRNAs can be sensitive predictive factors in the qualification of NSCLC patients to first-line immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Material and methods: The two-stage research on validation group (n=20) and study group (n=35) of patients with advanced NSCLC was conducted. Analysis of microRNAs expression by qPCR in plasma collected prior to the start of immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) or chemoimmunotherapy (combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy) was made. Broad-spectrum analysis of microRNAs expression was used in the studied group. Three microRNAs selected in that group as important for the effectiveness of ICIs were then examined in the validation group. Results: In the studied group, significantly higher expression of miRNA-126-3p, miR-144-3p and miR-146-5p was observed in patients with long PFS compared to those with short PFS. In the validation group, low miRNA-126 expression indicated lower median progression-free survival and overall survival (2.3 vs. 5.0 months and 5.2 vs 11.2, respectively). These patients had a significantly higher risk of progression (HR= 2.92, 95% CI: 1.01 to 8.40, p=0.04) and death (HR=3.64, 95% CI: 1.22 to 10.84, p=0.02). Conclusion: Our study showed that the expression of miR-126 in blood plasma may be a predictive factor for the effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Tratamiento con estimulación del nervio vago en pacientes con epilepsia resistente a los fármacos: experiencia en el Hospital Universitario Son Espases / Vagal nerve stimulation treatment in patients with drug resistant epilepsy: Son Espases University Hospital experience

Objetivo Presentar la experiencia en el tratamiento de la epilepsia resistente a los fármacos mediante estimulación del nervio vago (ENV) en nuestro centro, valorando el impacto de este tratamiento sobre el control de la enfermedad, así como sobre aspectos relacionados con la calidad de vida de los pacientes y de sus cuidadores principales. Material y métodos Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes implantados desde enero de 2004 hasta diciembre de 2012. Se evaluaron los resultados de encuestas y test completados por los pacientes y sus cuidadores principales. Resultados Se incluyeron 15 pacientes con un seguimiento medio tras la cirugía de 4,41 (0,5-8) años. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 25 (10-50) años. Más del 66% de los pacientes experimentaron una disminución en la intensidad de las crisis > 25%. El 47% presentó una reducción > 50% en la frecuencia de las mismas. Como efectos adversos indeseables un paciente presentó disfonía persistente, otro tos y molestias cervicales autolimitados, y otro molestias cervicales. En 2 pacientes fue necesaria la explantación por cefalea refractaria al tratamiento médico. No hubo complicaciones derivadas del acto (AU)

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience in treating drug-resistant epilepsy with vagal nerve stimulation in our centre, evaluating its impact on disease control and on different aspects related to the patients and main caretakers' quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients operated from January 2004 until December 2012. Interviews and tests completed by outpatients and principle caretakers were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included, with a mean postoperative follow-up of 4.41 (0.5-8) years. Mean age at implantation was 25 (10-50) years. Over 66% of the patients perceived a reduction greater than 25% of their crisis intensity. Forty-seven percent of the patients experienced a decrease greater than 50% in the number of crises. As undesired adverse events, one patient presented persistent dysphonia, another self-limited cough and cervical discomfort and another, persistent cervical discomfort. The device had to be removed in 2 patients due to refractory headaches. There were no complications derived from the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Vagal nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for reducing crisis frequency and intensity. The patients as well as their caretakers experience a subjective improvement in their quality of life. Despite its economic cost, it seems to reduce their care needs to a certain degree and its use may therefore be justified (AU)