Benefits of the Retrocaruncular Approach to the Medial Orbit: A Clinical And Anatomic Study.

BACKGROUND: Current trends in the management of medial orbital wall fractures are toward the development of transconjunctival incisions and the use of endoscopic-assisted methods. Different authors have suggested variations of the medial transconjunctival approach. METHODS: (1) In 30 fresh cadaver orbits, the classic transcaruncular approach was compared with the precaruncular and retrocaruncular approach under magnified dissection. (2) A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of 20 consecutive patients that underwent primary repair of medial orbital wall fractures using a retrocaruncular approach without endoscopic assistance. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained for all patients and were evaluated by 3 experienced clinicians. RESULTS: (1) Anatomic dissections showed that all 3 approaches provided excellent exposure of the entire medial orbital wall. The transcaruncular and precaruncular approaches, however, (a) both resulted in exposure of the upper and lower tarsi when incisions greater than 10 mm were used; (b) both required a transition from the preseptal plane to the postseptal plane when combined with inferior fornix incisions. (2) A clinical study of 20 patients showed all reconstructions were possible without endoscopic assistance, resulting in no postoperative complications. Postoperative computed tomography scans showed anatomic orbital reconstruction in all patients judged as excellent by the clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Medial orbital wall fractures can be successfully repaired using transconjunctival incisions without using endoscopes. The retrocaruncular approach surpasses the transcaruncular and precaruncular methods due to its decreased risk of postoperative lid complications and its ability to be directly carried to the inferior conjunctival fornix.

Presurgical unilateral cleft lip anthropometrics: implications for the choice of repair technique.

BACKGROUND: It has been stated that height of the lateral lip is difficult to obtain with the rotation advancement repair only when the lateral lip is short in both its vertical and horizontal dimensions. The authors studied preoperative cleft lip anthropometry to determine the frequency of the "geometrically unfavorable lateral lip"--short in both vertical and transverse dimensions. METHODS: Direct caliper measurements were taken by a single observer of the heights and of the transverse lengths in 100 consecutive patients (age ≥3 months and <6 months) with unilateral cleft lip (51 complete and 49 incomplete) who were under general anesthesia just before cleft lip repair. RESULTS: In 75 patients, the height of the lateral lip was less than that of the noncleft side; on average, 2.1 mm less than (or 82 percent of) the noncleft side (range, 50 to 133 percent). In 86 patients, the lateral lip transverse length was less than on the noncleft side; on average, 2.7 mm less than (or 86 percent of) the noncleft side (range, 66 to 114 percent). Of the 75 patients with height deficiency, 63 patients also had transverse length deficiency. There were 19 patients who exhibited vertical height deficiency of 4 mm or more (>1 SD from the mean), and 79 percent of these patients with extreme height deficiency also exhibited transverse length deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral lip is frequently short in both vertical and transverse dimensions. These findings warrant consideration for the use of repairs other than rotation advancement (and its variations) in the setting of lateral lip deficiency.

American society of maxillofacial surgeons outcome study: preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental findings in single-suture craniosynostosis.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the neurodevelopmental effects associated with single-suture, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis before and after surgery. Children diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis were evaluated by a psychologist using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) within 2 months before and again 1 year after surgical correction. The BSID-II is a widely used measure of infant cognitive and motor development. The scale consists of three parts, the Mental Developmental Index (MDI), the Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI), and the Behavior Rating Scale. The MDI and PDI yield age-standard scores (mean, 100; SD, 16). The children ranged in age from 2.5 to 10 months at the time of the craniofacial reconstruction (average age, 5.9 months). Metopic synostosis was diagnosed in 23 percent, sagittal synostosis in 45 percent, and unilateral coronal synostosis in 32 percent of patients. Twenty-two patients were evaluated preoperatively, of whom 15 patients were evaluated postoperatively. Mean baseline BSID-II scores revealed a mild delay in mental and motor scores (MDI, 82.3; PDI, 79.5). Mean postoperative BSID-II scores still revealed a mild delay in mental scores but significantly improved motor scores (MDI, 79.3; PDI, 89.3). Of the 15 children, four (27 percent) had BSID-II evaluations that were in the average range for all scales and nine infants (60 percent) had at least one MDI or PDI score in the significantly delayed range (<70). Among children with single-suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, mean Bayley scores indicated mild baseline deficits in both mental and motor scores. After surgical treatment, improvement was seen in the motor scale. It appears from this sample that neurodevelopmental abnormalities may be present in children with single-suture synostosis, and some may persist at 1 year of follow-up.