Complications and Technical Consideration of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis of 4033 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) is usually regarded as an easy and safe procedure in clinical settings, there is currently no report on complications incidence. Therefore, the present study investigated complications in a large cohort and described the technical considerations to minimize complications of real-time ultrasound-guided RSBs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided RSBs for perioperative pain control in laparoscopic surgery with an umbilical port between February 1, 2017, and February 28, 2021, at the Asan Medical Center in South Korea. All RSBs were performed bilaterally using a 23-gauge Quincke needle, and a bilateral 2-block placement was regarded as 1 RSB. Patient data, including demographics, preoperative laboratory data, preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication with the duration of discontinuation, and type of surgery, were collected to show the study population characteristics and explore potential factors associated with adverse events such as hematoma. Ultrasound images of patients and adverse events of RSBs, including extrarectus sheath injections, vascular injuries, bowel injury, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity, were also analyzed accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 4033 procedures were analyzed. The mean body mass index of the patients was 24.1 (21.8-26.5) kg/m2. The preoperative laboratory data were within normal range in 4028 (99.9%) patients. Preoperative antiplatelets or anticoagulants were administered in 17.3% of the patients. Overall, 96 complications (2.4%) were observed. Among them, extrarectus sheath injection occurred in 88 cases (2.2%), which included preperitoneal injection (0.9%) and intraperitoneal injection (1.3%). Vascular injuries constituted 8 cases (0.2%) and all vascular injuries resulted in hematoma: 7 cases of inferior epigastric artery injury with rectus sheath hematoma and 1 of inferior mesenteric artery injury with retroperitoneal hematoma. Bowel injury or local anesthetic systemic toxicity was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of RSBs performed on 4033 patients using a 23-gauge Quincke needle in patients with low body mass index, there were 8 cases (0.2%) of vascular injury, all of which accompanied hematoma.

Comparison of sitting and prone positions for real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement (US-TECP) has been recently introduced. Patient's position is associated with the success of spine interventions; however, the effects of position on the outcome of the procedure remain unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of patient positioning during real-time US-TECP. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to the prone position group (group P) and sitting position group (group S). The primary outcome was needling time during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were time to mark space, total number of needle passes, number of skin punctures, first-pass success, final success, crossover success, and visibility of ultrasound (US) views. Global Rating Scale (GRS) score, Patient Comfort Scale score, procedural pain intensity, patient satisfaction, and procedure-related complications were also determined. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in this study. The needling time was significantly shorter in group P than in group S (36.5 (26.5-51.0) vs 59.5 (34.5-152.0) s, p<0.01). The numbers of needle passes and skin punctures were significantly lesser in group P than in group S. First-pass success was higher in group P than in group S. Group P had higher GRS compared with group S. The time to mark space, final success, US visibility score, Patient Comfort Scale score, procedural pain intensity, and patient satisfaction did not differ between the groups. One patient in group S developed a vasovagal reaction. DISCUSSION: This study shows that prone position may be preferred for real-time US-TECP, considering its better clinical usefulness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0005757.

Factors Associated With Rebound Pain After Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: Although patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is an effective form of regional analgesia for abdominal surgery, some patients experience significant rebound pain after the discontinuation of PCEA. However, risk factors for rebound pain associated with PCEA in major abdominal surgery remain unknown. This study evaluated the incidence of rebound pain related to PCEA and explored potential associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 236 patients using PCEA following hepatobiliary and pancreas surgery between 2018 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Rebound pain was defined as an increase from well-controlled pain (numeric rating scale <4) during epidural analgesia to severe pain (numeric rating scale ≥7) within 24 hours of discontinuation of PCEA. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with rebound pain. RESULTS: Patients were categorized into the nonrebound pain group (170 patients; 72%) and the rebound pain group (66 patients; 28%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative prognostic nutritional index below 45 (odds ratio=2.080, 95% confidential interval=1.061-4.079, P =0.033) and intraoperative transfusion (odds ratio=4.190, 95% confidential interval=1.436-12.226, P =0.009) were independently associated with rebound pain after PCEA discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Rebound pain after PCEA occurred in ~30% of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery, resulting in insufficient postoperative pain management. Preoperative low prognostic nutritional index and intraoperative transfusion may be associated with rebound pain after PCEA discontinuation.

Vocal cord paralysis following general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation: a clinical review on 43 cases.

BACKGROUND: Vocal cord paralysis (VCP) is one of the most stressful experiences for patients undergoing general anesthesia. Moreover, it is a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia and may increase morbidity and mortality. We examined several clinical features of the condition by reviewing the medical records of patients who experienced VCP following general anesthesia. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 321 patients who consulted an otolaryngologist owing to hoarseness, sore throat, throat discomfort, or dysphagia after general anesthesia. Among these, we included in the present study 43 patients who were diagnosed with VCP by laryngoscopy, who did not have symptoms of suspected VCP before surgery, who had no past history of VCP, and for whom endotracheal intubation was not continued after surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of patients with VCP was 51.3 years. With respect to surgical site, the most common was upper limb surgery, performed in 12 cases (9 cases were performed in sitting posture. With respect to surgical duration, only 11 cases lasted less than 3 h, whereas 32 cases required a surgical duration longer than 3 h. The most common symptom of VCP was hoarseness. Nine of the patients with VCP recovered spontaneously, but VCP persisted in 13 cases until the final follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS: We hope that this study might call attention to the occurrence of VCP following general anesthesia. Moreover, it is necessary to further evaluate the reasons for the higher incidence of VCP in upper limb surgery performed in sitting posture.