RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We undertook a collaborative study in a multidisciplinary team to channel refractory epilepsy patients to test a hypothesis about placement of intracranial electroencephalography arrays. DESIGN: This was a descriptive case series. Prospective non-invasive presurgical evaluations were based on clinical semiology, magnetic resonance imaging, video-electroencephalography findings and neuropsychological assessments. If the results were discordant, a hypothesis was generated using individualised combinations of positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging and Wada tests. The indications for intracranial electroencephalography were: (a) focal magnetic resonance imaging, ictal/interictal scalp electroencephalography with variable results (group A); (b) multi-focal magnetic resonance imaging, focal/multi-focal ictal scalp electroencephalography (group B); (c) non-lesional magnetic resonance imaging, focal/multi-focal ictal scalp electroencephalography (group C). We evaluated whether the seizure-onset zones and eloquent areas were delineated, surgical outcomes (if operated on), and pathology results. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre for neurology in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: A total of 105 refractory epilepsy patients completed non-invasive presurgical evaluations over the period 2007 to 2009. Thirty-two patients were eligible for direct resective surgery, and another 25 patients had a testing hypothesis formulated. Of these 25 patients, 10 were eligible for intracranial electroencephalography based on technical/financial considerations. RESULTS: All 10 patients (group A=2, group B=4, group C=4) had their epileptogenic zones defined. Six patients underwent functional mapping, all of whom had their eloquent areas defined. Seven of the 10 patients underwent resective surgery; four of them achieved Engel class I/II outcomes. The dichotomised outcomes were 100% (group A), 50% (group B), and 33% (group C) achieving Engel class I/II. Two patients had asymptomatic subdural haematoma. There was no intracranial infection or operative mortality. In five (71%) of seven of the patients, a histological diagnosis was established. CONCLUSION: Proper deployment of intracranial electroencephalography is useful in the presurgical evaluation of patients with refractory epilepsy. This modality of management is potentially of benefit for patients with refractory epilepsy, but is underutilised locally.
Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Frontal/diagnóstico , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Frontal/cirugía , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Adulto , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Frontal/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Estudios Prospectivos , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
A middle-aged man presented with bone pain at multiple sites due to tumour-induced osteomalacia. The underlying occult phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour was identified by octreotide scan 5 years after presentation and confirmed by computed tomography. Tumour resection resulted in normalisation of blood chemistry and bone densitometry. Clinico-radiologico-pathological correlation and ultrastructural studies of the tumour threw light on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of this rare disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Tejidos Conjuntivo y Blando/patología , Osteomalacia/etiología , Fosfatos/orina , Factor-23 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Conjuntivo y Blando/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Conjuntivo y Blando/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Conjuntivo y Blando/ultraestructura , RadiografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hip and knee replacement are common operative procedures to improve mobility and quality of life. Adequate pain relief is essential in the postoperative period to enable ambulation and initiation of physiotherapy. Lumbar epidural analgesia is a common modality for pain relief following these procedures. However, there is no systematic review of the evidence comparing the efficacy of epidural analgesia with other postoperative analgesic modalities. As the use of epidural analgesia may delay the initiation of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis due to the potential risk of epidural hematoma, a synthesis of the evidence is necessary to determine whether or not alternative analgesic modalities are worse, equivalent, or better than epidural analgesia. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to answer the question: "Is lumbar epidural analgesia more efficacious than systemic analgesia or long-acting spinal analgesia for postoperative pain relief in patients after elective hip or knee replacement?" SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched from their inception to June 2001. Reference lists of review articles and included studies were also reviewed for additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: A study was included if it was a randomized or pseudo randomized controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing hip or knee replacement, in which postoperative lumbar epidural analgesia was compared to other methods for pain relief. Study selection was performed unblinded in duplicate. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected unblinded in duplicate. Information on the patients, methods, interventions, outcomes (pain relief, postoperative function, length of stay) and adverse events were recorded. Methodological quality was assessed using a validated 5-point scale. Meta-analysis was conducted when sufficient data existed from two or more studies. Heterogeneity testing was performed using the Breslow-Day method. The fixed effects model was used unless heterogeneity was present, in which case, a random effects model was used. Continuous data were summarized as weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous data were summarized as odds ratios (OR) and numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) or numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH) with their respective 95% CI. Graphical representation of continuous data used the MetaView program. MAIN RESULTS: In the first four to six hours after surgery, patients receiving epidural analgesia had less pain at rest, based on visual analog scores (VAS), than patients receiving systemic analgesia (SMD -0.77; 95% CI -1.24 to -0.31). This effect was not statistically significant by 18 to 24 hours (SMD -0.29; 95% CI -0.73 to 0.16). These observations were based only on studies evaluating populations consisting of total knee replacements alone or mixed populations of total hip or total knee replacements. For pain relief with movement after surgery, patients receiving epidural analgesia reported lower pain scores than patients receiving systemic analgesia in all four studies examining these outcomes. The choice of epidural agents may also influence the extent to which epidural analgesia differs from systemic analgesia. The differences between epidural analgesia and systemic analgesia in the frequency of nausea and vomiting (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.49) or depression of breathing (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.54) were not statistically significant. Sedation occurred less frequently with epidural analgesia (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.97) with a number-needed-to-harm of 7.7 (95% CI 3.5 to 42.0) patients for the systemic analgesia group. Retention of urine (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.63 to 7.51; NNH 4.5, 95% CI 2.3 to 12.2), itching (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.76 to 12.78; NNH 6.8, 95% CI 4.4 to 15.8), and low blood pressure (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.72; NNH 6.7, 95% CI 3.5 to 103) were more frequent with epidural analgesia compared to systemic analgesia. There were insufficient numbers to draw conclusions on the edural analgesia compared to systemic analgesia. There were insufficient numbers to draw conclusions on the effect of epidural analgesia on serious postoperative complications, functional outcomes, or length of hospital stay. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia may be useful for postoperative pain relief following major lower limb joint replacements. However, the benefits may be limited to the early (four to six hours) postoperative period. An epidural infusion of local anesthetic or local anesthetic-narcotic mixture may be better than epidural narcotic alone. The magnitude of pain relief must be weighed against the frequency of adverse events. The current evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions on the frequency of rare complications from epidural analgesia, postoperative morbidity or mortality, functional outcomes, or length of hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgesia , Analgesia Epidural , Anestesia Local , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Systematic reviews are structured reviews that use scientific strategies to reduce bias in the collection, appraisal, and interpretation of relevant studies. We undertook a systematic review of published systematic reviews in perioperative medicine to summarize the areas currently covered by this type of literature, to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews in this field, and to assess some of the methodologic and reporting issues that are unique to systematic reviews. Computerized bibliographic databases, citation review, and hand searches were performed to identify eligible articles. Quality was assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. Eight-two systematic reviews were found. Reviews in perioperative medicine tended to evaluate prophylactic or therapeutic interventions. No differences were seen in quality between reviews published in anesthesia and nonanesthesia journals. Nearly half of all systematic reviews had only minor or minimal flaws; however, methods can be improved with expanded search strategies, use of least two reviewers to assess each study, use of validated methods to evaluate quality, and assessment of potential sources of bias. IMPLICATIONS: The quality of systematic reviews relating to perioperative medicine was examined systematically and found to be similar in quality to those in other specialties. Adoption of recently published criteria on writing and methods could further improve this type of literature.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Publicaciones , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Bases de Datos como Asunto , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is an autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by congenital anomalies affecting the airway, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and central nervous systems. The presence of these anomalies as well as the potential for muscle rigidity with or without hyperthermia present challenges to anesthesia. This report describes our institution's experience with SLOS patients undergoing anesthesia in Canada. CLINICAL FEATURES: Three patients diagnosed with SLOS at McMaster University underwent a total of five anesthetics for diagnostic imaging and surgical procedures. The age of the patients ranged from two months to four years. Four intravenous anesthetics and one balanced general anesthetic were administered. One patient was noted to have a diminished laryngoscopic view but no difficult intubations were encountered. One patient required re-intubation due to upper airway obstruction related to the surgical procedure in the postoperative period. No cardiovascular, respiratory, or temperature complications were experienced. CONCLUSION: This report describes the anesthetic management in three patients with SLOS. Although the syndrome raises a number of potential anesthetic concerns, few complications were seen. This is consistent with other cases reported in the literature, which is reviewed in this report.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Síndrome de Smith-Lemli-Opitz/cirugía , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Síndrome de Smith-Lemli-Opitz/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of isotonic crystalloids compared with colloids in fluid resuscitation. DATA SOURCES: Computerized bibliographic search of published research and citation review of relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION: All randomized clinical trials of adult patients requiring fluid resuscitation comparing isotonic crystalloids vs. colloids were included. Pulmonary edema, mortality, and length of stay were evaluated. Independent review of 105 articles identified 17 relevant primary studies of 814 patients. Weighted c about article inclusion was high (0.76). DATA EXTRACTION: Data on population, interventions, outcomes, and methodologic quality of the studies were obtained by duplicate independent review with differences resolved by consensus. Weighted ic on the validity assessment was moderate (0.54). DATA SYNTHESIS: No difference was observed overall between crystalloid and colloid resuscitation with respect to mortality and pulmonary edema; however, the power of the aggregated data was insufficient to detect small but potentially clinically important differences. Subgroup analysis suggested a statistically significant difference in mortality in trauma in favor of crystalloid resuscitation (relative risk 0.39, 95% confidence intervals: 0.17 to 0.89). Several methodologic issues are noteworthy regarding the primary studies, including lack of blinding (except in three studies). The type, dose, and duration of fluid administration and outcomes measured were different across these trials. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is no apparent difference in pulmonary edema, mortality, or length of stay between isotonic crystalloid and colloid resuscitation. Crystalloid resuscitation is associated with a lower mortality in trauma patients. Methodologic limitations preclude any evidence-based clinical recommendations. Larger well-designed randomized trials are needed to achieve sufficient power to detect potentially small differences in treatment effects if they truly exist.
Asunto(s)
Coloides , Cuidados Críticos , Fluidoterapia , Sustitutos del Plasma , Soluciones para Rehidratación , Choque Séptico/terapia , Coloides/efectos adversos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Soluciones Cristaloides , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Soluciones Isotónicas , Tiempo de Internación , Sustitutos del Plasma/efectos adversos , Edema Pulmonar/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Soluciones para Rehidratación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This report describes a case of organophosphate intoxication refractory to atropine in which glycopyrrolate was used to reduce cholinergic symptoms, and describes the development of intermediate syndrome, an uncommon subacute complication of organophosphate poisoning. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 44-yr-old woman presented in cholinergic crisis following malathion ingestion. Treatment was initiated with atropine and pralidoxime. Despite clinical signs of adequate atropinisation, the patient continued to have profuse bronchorrhoea, which resolved with glycopyrrolate. During her course in the intensive care unit, she displayed a subacute deterioration in neuromuscular and mental status with decrement-increment phenomenon on electromyography consistent with intermediate syndrome. The patient eventually made a complete recovery. CONCLUSION: This case report describes the successful use of glycopyrrolate in organophosphate intoxication and the development of the intermediate syndrome, characterised by onset of weakness of neck flexors, proximal limb muscles, and respiratory muscles within one to four days after poisoning. Recognition of the syndrome is important in light of the potential for respiratory depression requiring ventilatory support.
Asunto(s)
Glicopirrolato/uso terapéutico , Insecticidas/envenenamiento , Malatión/envenenamiento , Parasimpatolíticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , SíndromeRESUMEN
A prospective study of Chinese patients with megaloblastic anaemia was conducted at the Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital from 1 May 1994 to 31 August 1997. Megaloblastic anaemia was diagnosed in 57 patients, 52 of whom were eligible for further evaluation. The median age of these 52 patients was 73.5 years and the male to female ratio was 1.08:1. The serum cobalamin level (median, 56 ng/L) was low in 46 (86.5%) patients. In five (9.6%) patients, both serum cobalamin and red blood cell folate concentrations were low. Isolated low red blood cell folate level was demonstrated in one (1.9%) patient. Serum antibodies against intrinsic factor and gastric parietal cells were detected in 32 (61.5%) and 26 (50.0%) patients, respectively; 19 (36.5%) patients had both types of antibody. The aetiology of megaloblastic anaemia included pernicious anaemia in 39 (75%) patients, postgastrectomy vitamin B12 deficiency in five (9.6%) patients, and nutritional deficiency in two (3.8%) patients; the cause was undetermined in six (11.5%) patients.