Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Minim Access Surg ; 16(2): 132-137, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777988

RESUMEN

Purpose: Among laparoscopic surgeries in inguinal hernias, totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair has demonstrated favourable results in reduction of post-operative pain and mean operative times with early return to physical activity. We have done a prospective comparative study on two different techniques of mesh fixation, i.e., transfascial suture and tack fixation. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective, non-randomised comparative study done on inguinal hernia patients operated by TEP repair from October 2014 to September 2016. These data were compared in two techniques of mesh fixation (tack and transfascial sutures) in terms of post-operative complications, pain scores by visual analogue scale (VAS) and cost analysis of the procedure. Results: Our study on 69 total patients (44 tack fixation and 25 suture fixation group) revealed that mean VAS scores for post-operative pain were not having any statistically significant difference in the tack group versus suture group (2.42 ± 0.24 vs. 2.2 ± 0.24) at 24 h, but VAS scores in the follow-up period at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months were 1.14 ± 0.33 versus 0.67 ± 0.27; 0.78 ± 0.24 versus 0.07 ± 0.06; 0.42 ± 0.17 versus 0.07 ± 0.06 and 0.5 ± 0.11 versus 0.07 ± 0.06, respectively, which showed significant difference at 1 and 3 months, suggesting less pain in the suture group. No significant difference was noted in other post-operative complications. Conclusion: Transfascial suture fixation of mesh in TEP repair of inguinal hernia can be a cost-effective procedure with a comparable safety profile as compared to tack fixation.

2.
Indian J Dent Res ; 28(6): 666-670, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29256467

RESUMEN

Faulty radiographs have poor diagnostic quality, and repetition of such poor-quality radiographs leads to increased patient exposure to radiation. Since digital panoramic radiography has replaced manual radiography, the only hindrance in producing good-quality radiographs is the positioning errors. OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to determine the various positioning errors and their relative frequency and to identify those errors directly responsible for diagnostically inadequate images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred panoramic radiographs taken serially (from the year 2007) were retrospectively assessed for the positioning errors by three oral and maxillofacial radiology specialists using a performa enlisting the errors. The three specialists had different duration of clinical experience and they evaluated the orthopantograms as diagnostically acceptable or unacceptable. They also observed the relative frequency of all the positioning errors. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The kappa value for intraobserver agreement was calculated, which suggested that the agreement among the observers was fair. RESULTS: Of the 500 panoramic radiographs viewed by the three observers, 25 (5%) had no errors, while 475 (95%) showed one or more positioning errors. The most common error in our study was found to be head turned to one side (33.8%) and the least common error was patient movement during exposure (1.8%). CONCLUSION: Positioning errors are very common in digital panoramic radiography, and they lead to production of poor-quality radiographs. The operator should take this fact into consideration and spend more time in patient positioning, thereby reducing the repetition of radiographs and unwanted patient exposure.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Radiografía Panorámica/métodos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ; 21(3): 442-446, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29391724

RESUMEN

AIM: The present study attempts to compare the bite mark overlays generated by three different methods. The objectives of the study were to compare the three commonly used techniques for overlay generation and to evaluate the interobserver reliability in assessing bite marks by these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overlays were produced from the biting surfaces of six upper and six lower anterior teeth of 30 dental study models using the following three methods: (a) Hand tracing from wax impressions, (b) radiopaque impression method and (c) computer-based method. RESULTS: The computer-based method was found to be the most accurate method. Of the two hand tracing methods, radiopaque wax impression method was better than the wax impression method for overlay generation. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that forensic odontologists use computerized method, but the use of hand tracing overlays in bite mark comparison cases using radiopaque wax impression method can also be done where sophisticated software and trained persons in forensic odontology are not available.

4.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ; 20(2): 178-82, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27601805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the current status and future trends in telepathology (TP) and digital pathology (DP) in central India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-constructed questionnaire including 12 questions was designed with five specialists, to improve the design ambiguity. The study was conducted through postal and online survey consisting of 12 questions and sent to 300 histopathologists. RESULTS: A total of 247 histopathologists answered the survey. The overall response rate was 81%. 98% pathologists felt the need for TP and DP. 34% pathologists used digital photomicrographic images in routine practice. Utilization of DP in most efficient way was observed by 48% pathologists mainly for the purpose of teaching in academic institutions. 82% believed that TP is helpful to take an expert opinion whereas only26% believed that a second opinion has to be taken. With respect to limitations, 67% pathologists believed that its cost-effective whereas 51% revealed high use of TP in next 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows that as the field evolves, pathologists are more towards welcoming TP and DP, provided frequent workshops and training programs are conducted. The results of this survey indicates that pathology staff across central India currently utilize gross digital images for educational or academic purposes. They also revealed that technology will be required in near future applications in academics, consultation and for medico-legal purposes.

5.
Indian J Dent Res ; 23(5): 698-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23422634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the application of thyroid collars (TCs) affects the results of cephalometric study. STUDY DESIGN: The Steiner cephalometric analysis of the patients was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs, which were taken twice for each patient: Once using TCs (TC group; n = 50) and once without using TCs (NTC group; n = 50). A randomized and observer-blinded diagnostic study with head films taken from the two aforementioned groups was performed and results were evaluated with the t-test and Z-test, using GraphPad Prism 4 software. RESULTS: Statistical analysis using t-test was performed. The values of the line angles used in Steiner cephalometric analysis were compared for which values of each angle remained unchanged when done using TCs and without TC to the same samples. CONCLUSIONS: Lead shielding of the thyroid gland does not affect landmark identification or the specific measurements of the angulations traced during cephalometric analysis. TCs should be routinely applied during cephalometric radiography if cephalometric analyses are limited to the structures above the second cervical vertebra.


Asunto(s)
Cefalometría/métodos , Ropa de Protección , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Glándula Tiroides/efectos de la radiación , Adolescente , Adulto , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Diseño de Equipo , Cara/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Faciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía Panorámica/métodos , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto Joven
6.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 69(6): e135-40, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21277069

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic quality of images generated using the newly developed digital volume tomography (DVT) system and comparing them with conventional images from patients with maxillofacial trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 22 male patients aged 18 to 60 years with a history of maxillofacial trauma. Each patient had undergone conventional radiographic and DVT examinations to analyze the number of fracture lines in the jaws and to compare the images for their diagnostic quality by an oral radiologist and a general radiologist using the χ(2) test. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the number of fracture lines evaluated on the conventional radiographs and on DVT, especially for condylar head (7) and the midface (4.41 to 4.57), zygomaticomaxillary complex and Le Fort fractures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of fracture lines and visualization within the mandibular-maxillary area using DVT was superior to using conventional radiographs.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Fracturas Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Panorámica , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...