Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 48(4): 100179, 2024 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053109

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) became available in Victoria, Australia, in 2016. We examined non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) usage among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after PrEP became available. METHODS: We included MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for nPEP between 2011 and 2021. We analysed three periods: the 'pre-PrEP' (01 Jan 2011 to 25 Jul 2016), 'PrEP before COVID-19' (26 Jul 2016 to 31 Dec 2019), and 'PrEP during COVID-19' (01 Jan 2020 to 31 Dec 2021). RESULTS: There were 222,978 consultations for MSM; 8292 (3.7%) were nPEP consultations. The proportion of nPEP consultations increased from 3.3% (3093/94263) in the pre-PrEP period to 4.3% (3843/89251) in the PrEP before COVID-19 period then dropped to 3.4% (1356/39464) during the COVID-19 period. Compared to Australian-born MSM, MSM born in Central/South America (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.40) had the highest odds of accessing nPEP, followed by Asian-born MSM (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.27-1.71) after adjusting for PrEP availability and COVID-19. Those newly arrived in Australia in ≤4 years had higher odds (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.22) of accessing nPEP than those living in Australia for >4 years. CONCLUSION: nPEP prescriptions declined with PrEP availability. Newly arrived overseas-born MSM who are unlikely to have access to subsidised PrEP have a higher demand of nPEP. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Increasing PrEP education and ensuring equal access is vital in the drive to reduce new HIV diagnoses.

2.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(7): 102447, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824739

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current clinical care for common bacterial STIs (Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG)) involves empiric antimicrobial therapy when clients are symptomatic, or if asymptomatic, waiting for laboratory testing and recall if indicated. Near-to-patient testing (NPT) can improve pathogen-specific prescribing and reduce unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use in treating sexually transmitted infections (STI) by providing same-day delivery of results and treatment. METHODS: We compared the economic cost of NPT to current clinic practice for managing clients with suspected proctitis, non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), or as an STI contact, from a health provider's perspective. With a microsimulation of 1000 clients, we calculated the cost per client tested and per STI- and pathogen- detected for each testing strategy. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the main outcomes. Costs are reported as Australian dollars (2023). RESULTS: In the standard care arm, cost per client tested for proctitis, NGU in men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexual men were the highest at $247.96 (95% Prediction Interval (PI): 246.77-249.15), $204.23 (95% PI: 202.70-205.75) and $195.01 (95% PI: 193.81-196.21) respectively. Comparatively, in the NPT arm, it costs $162.36 (95% PI: 161.43-163.28), $158.39 (95% PI: 157.62-159.15) and $149.17 (95% PI: 148.62-149.73), respectively. Using NPT resulted in cost savings of 34.52%, 22.45% and 23.51%, respectively. Among all the testing strategies, substantial difference in cost per client tested between the standard care arm and the NPT arm was observed for contacts of CT or NG, varying from 27.37% to 35.28%. CONCLUSION: We found that NPT is cost-saving compared with standard clinical care for individuals with STI symptoms and sexual contacts of CT, NG, and MG.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/economía , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/tratamiento farmacológico , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/economía , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Australia , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/economía , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Mycoplasma genitalium , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/economía , Uretritis/diagnóstico , Uretritis/economía , Uretritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Uretritis/microbiología
3.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e46845, 2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk factors for oropharyngeal gonorrhea have not been examined in sex workers despite the increasing prevalence of gonorrhea infection. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the risk factors for oropharyngeal gonorrhea in female and gender-diverse sex workers (including cisgender and transgender women, nonbinary and gender fluid sex workers, and those with a different identity) and examine kissing, oral sex, and mouthwash practices with clients. METHODS: This mixed methods case-control study was conducted from 2018 to 2020 at 2 sexual health clinics in Melbourne, Victoria, and Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. We recruited 83 sex workers diagnosed with oropharyngeal gonorrhea (cases) and 581 sex workers without (controls). Semistructured interviews with 19 sex workers from Melbourne were conducted. RESULTS: In the case-control study, the median age of 664 sex workers was 30 (IQR 25-36) years. Almost 30% of sex workers (192/664, 28.9%) reported performing condomless fellatio on clients. Performing condomless fellatio with clients was the only behavior associated with oropharyngeal gonorrhea (adjusted odds ratio 3.6, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; P=.001). Most participants (521/664, 78.5%) used mouthwash frequently. In the qualitative study, almost all sex workers reported kissing clients due to demand and generally reported following clients' lead with regard to kissing style and duration. However, they used condoms for fellatio because they considered it a risky practice for contracting sexually transmitted infections, unlike cunnilingus without a dental dam. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that condomless fellatio is a risk factor for oropharyngeal gonorrhea among sex workers despite most sex workers using condoms with their clients for fellatio. Novel interventions, particularly targeting the oropharynx, will be required for oropharyngeal gonorrhea prevention.


Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Trabajadores Sexuales , Humanos , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Trabajadores Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajadores Sexuales/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Masculino , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Victoria/epidemiología , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia/epidemiología , Orofaringe/microbiología , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa
4.
Med J Aust ; 218(5): 223-228, 2023 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854387

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in the positive infectious syphilis test rate among women and heterosexual men in major Australian cities, and rate differences by social, biomedical, and behavioural determinants of health. DESIGN, SETTING: Analysis of data extracted from de-identified patient records from 34 sexual health clinics participating in the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance of Sexually Transmissible Infections and Blood Borne Viruses (ACCESS). PARTICIPANTS: First tests during calendar year for women and heterosexual men aged 15 years or more in major cities who attended ACCESS sexual health clinics during 2011-2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive infectious syphilis test rate; change in annual positive test rate. RESULTS: 180 of 52 221 tested women (0.34%) and 239 of 36 341 heterosexual men (0.66%) were diagnosed with infectious syphilis. The positive test rate for women was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-3.2) per 1000 tests in 2011, 3.0 (95% CI, 2.0-4.2) per 1000 tests in 2019 (change per year: rate ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25); for heterosexual men it was 6.1 (95% CI, 3.8-9.2) per 1000 tests in 2011 and 7.6 (95% CI, 5.6-10) per 1000 tests in 2019 (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). In multivariable analyses, the positive test rate was higher for women (adjusted RR [aRR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.34-2.55) and heterosexual men (aRR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.53-3.74) in areas of greatest socio-economic disadvantage than for those in areas of least socio-economic disadvantage. It was also higher for Indigenous women (aRR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.22-4.70) and for women who reported recent injection drug use (aRR, 4.87; 95% CI, 2.18-10.9) than for other women; it was lower for bisexual than heterosexual women (aRR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81) and for women who reported recent sex work (aRR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.29-0.44). The positive test rate was higher for heterosexual men aged 40-49 years (aRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.42-3.12) or more than 50 years (aRR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.53-3.65) than for those aged 15-29 years. CONCLUSION: The positive test rate among both urban women and heterosexual men tested was higher in 2019 than in 2011. People who attend reproductive health or alcohol and drug services should be routinely screened for syphilis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Sífilis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiología , Heterosexualidad , Ciudades , Vigilancia de Guardia , Australia/epidemiología , Conducta Sexual , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología
6.
Med J Aust ; 217(3): 149-154, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35820664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based HIV self-test kits among men who have sex with men in Australia. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Gay, bisexual, and other men aged 18 years or older who have sex with men, who attended two metropolitan sexual health clinics in Sydney and Melbourne, 7 January - 10 December 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ease of use of HIV self-test kits; preferred HIV self-test type; difficulties encountered during HIV self-testing. RESULTS: 170 men were recruited (median age, 34 years; interquartile range, 29-43 years); 144 identified as gay (85%), 96 were born outside Australia (57%). Participants were more likely to report the oral fluid HIV self-test was easy to use than the blood-based self-test (oral fluid, 99%; blood, 86%; odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-6.6). The oral fluid test was preferred by 98 participants (58%; 95% CI, 50-65%), the blood-based test by 69 (41%; 95% CI, 33-48%). Difficulties with the oral fluid test kit identified by observing nurses included problems placing the buffer solution into the stand (40 of 170 participants, 24%) and not swabbing both gums (23 of 169, 14%); difficulties with the blood-based test kit included problems filling the device test channel (69 of 170, 41%) and squeezing the finger firmly enough to generate a blood drop (42 of 170, 25%). No participant received an invalid result with the oral fluid self-test; two of 162 participants (1%) received invalid results with the blood self-test. After adjusting for age, education level, and ethnic background, characteristics associated with higher odds of using HIV self-testing in the future were overseas birth (adjusted OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.42-6.64), and self-evaluated ease of use and confidence in using the kits. CONCLUSION: It is important to provide options for obtaining both oral fluid- and blood-based HIV self-tests. The usability and acceptability of both kits were high, but the ease of use and perceived accuracy influenced test kit preference.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Autoevaluación
8.
Sex Transm Infect ; 98(1): 11-16, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33436503

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Chlamydia and gonorrhoea are common sexually transmitted infections that infect the oropharynx, anorectum and urethra in men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed to examine the pattern of infection at more than one site (multisite) for chlamydia and gonorrhoea among MSM. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of MSM attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for the first time between 2018 and 2019. We included MSM aged ≥16 years who had tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis at all three sites (oropharynx, anorectum and urethra). We compared infections that occurred at a single site (termed single-site infection) and those that occurred at more than one site (termed multisite infections). RESULTS: Of the 3938 men who were tested for chlamydia and gonorrhoea, 498/3938 men (12.6%, 95% CI 11.5% to 13.6%) had chlamydia at any site, of whom 400/498 (80.3%, 95% CI 78.9% to 81.2%) had single-site chlamydia infection, and 98/498 (19.7%, 95% CI 16.2% to 23.1%) had multisite infections. A similar proportion of men had gonorrhoea at any site (447/3938, 11.4%, 95% CI 10.3% to 12.2%), but among these 447 men, single-site infection was less common (256/447, 57.3%, 95% CI 52.6% to 61.7%, p<0.001) and multisite infection (191/447, 42.7%, 95% CI 38.2% to 47.3%, p<0.001) was more common than chlamydia. There were also marked differences by anatomical site. Urethral infection commonly occurred as single sites (75/122, 61.5%, 95% CI 52.8% to 70.1%) for chlamydia but uncommonly occurred for gonorrhoea (12/100, 12.0%, 95% CI 5.6% to 18.3%, p<0.001). In contrast, anorectal infection uncommonly occurred as multisite infection for chlamydia (98/394, 24.9%, 95% CI 20.6% to 29.1%) but was common (184/309, 59.5%, 95% CI 54.0% to 64.9%, p<0.001) for gonorrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: The markedly different pattern of site-specific infection for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections among the same MSM suggests significant differences in the transmissibility between anatomical sites and the duration of each infection at each site.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Orofaringe/microbiología , Recto/microbiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Uretra/microbiología , Adulto , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/microbiología
9.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 7(12): e32407, 2021 12 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34874884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men are a risk group for anal human papillomavirus (HPV) and anal cancer. Australia introduced a universal school-based HPV vaccination program in 2013. Self-reported HPV vaccination status has been widely used in clinical and research settings, but its accuracy is understudied. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the accuracy of self-reported HPV vaccination status among gay and bisexual adolescent males. METHODS: We included 192 gay and bisexual males aged 16-20 years from the Human Papillomavirus in Young People Epidemiological Research 2 (HYPER2) study in Melbourne, Australia. All participants had been eligible for the universal school-based HPV vaccination program implemented in 2013 and were asked to self-report their HPV vaccination status. Written informed consent was obtained to verify their HPV vaccination status using records at the National HPV Vaccination Program Register and the Australian Immunisation Register. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of self-reported HPV vaccination status. RESULTS: The median age of the 192 males was 19 (IQR 18-20) years. There were 128 males (67%) who had HPV vaccination records documented on either registry. Self-reported HPV vaccination had a sensitivity of 47.7% (95% CI 38.8%-56.7%; 61/128), a specificity of 85.9% (95% CI 75.0%-93.4%; 55/64), a positive predictive value of 87.1% (95% CI 77.0%-93.9%; 61/70), and a negative predictive value of 45.1% (95% CI 36.1%-54.3%; 55/122). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported HPV vaccination status among Australian gay and bisexual adolescent males underestimates actual vaccination and may be inaccurate for clinical and research purposes.


Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Autoinforme , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
10.
Lancet HIV ; 8(9): e531-e543, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robust age-specific estimates of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in men can inform anal cancer prevention efforts. We aimed to evaluate the age-specific prevalence of anal HPV, HSIL, and their combination, in men, stratified by HIV status and sexuality. METHODS: We did a systematic review for studies on anal HPV infection in men and a pooled analysis of individual-level data from eligible studies across four groups: HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV-negative MSM, HIV-positive men who have sex with women (MSW), and HIV-negative MSW. Studies were required to inform on type-specific HPV infection (at least HPV16), detected by use of a PCR-based test from anal swabs, HIV status, sexuality (MSM, including those who have sex with men only or also with women, or MSW), and age. Authors of eligible studies with a sample size of 200 participants or more were invited to share deidentified individual-level data on the above four variables. Authors of studies including 40 or more HIV-positive MSW or 40 or more men from Africa (irrespective of HIV status and sexuality) were also invited to share these data. Pooled estimates of anal high-risk HPV (HR-HPV, including HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68), and HSIL or worse (HSIL+), were compared by use of adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) from generalised linear models. FINDINGS: The systematic review identified 93 eligible studies, of which 64 contributed data on 29 900 men to the pooled analysis. Among HIV-negative MSW anal HPV16 prevalence was 1·8% (91 of 5190) and HR-HPV prevalence was 6·9% (345 of 5003); among HIV-positive MSW the prevalences were 8·7% (59 of 682) and 26·9% (179 of 666); among HIV-negative MSM they were 13·7% (1455 of 10 617) and 41·2% (3798 of 9215), and among HIV-positive MSM 28·5% (3819 of 13 411) and 74·3% (8765 of 11 803). In HIV-positive MSM, HPV16 prevalence was 5·6% (two of 36) among those age 15-18 years and 28·8% (141 of 490) among those age 23-24 years (ptrend=0·0091); prevalence was 31·7% (1057 of 3337) among those age 25-34 years and 22·8% (451 of 1979) among those age 55 and older (ptrend<0·0001). HPV16 prevalence in HIV-negative MSM was 6·7% (15 of 223) among those age 15-18 and 13·9% (166 of 1192) among those age 23-24 years (ptrend=0·0076); the prevalence plateaued thereafter (ptrend=0·72). Similar age-specific patterns were observed for HR-HPV. No significant differences for HPV16 or HR-HPV were found by age for either HIV-positive or HIV-negative MSW. HSIL+ detection ranged from 7·5% (12 of 160) to 54·5% (61 of 112) in HIV-positive MSM; after adjustment for heterogeneity, HIV was a significant predictor of HSIL+ (aPR 1·54, 95% CI 1·36-1·73), HPV16-positive HSIL+ (1·66, 1·36-2·03), and HSIL+ in HPV16-positive MSM (1·19, 1·04-1·37). Among HPV16-positive MSM, HSIL+ prevalence increased with age. INTERPRETATION: High anal HPV prevalence among young HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM highlights the benefits of gender-neutral HPV vaccination before sexual activity over catch-up vaccination. HIV-positive MSM are a priority for anal cancer screening research and initiatives targeting HPV16-positive HSIL+. FUNDING: International Agency for Research on Cancer.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Lesiones Intraepiteliales Escamosas/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/clasificación , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Sexualidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones Intraepiteliales Escamosas/virología
11.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e041782, 2021 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33419912

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the frequency of mouthwash use and its association to oral sex practice in heterosexuals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Data obtained from a sexual health clinic in Victoria, Australia, between March 2019 and April 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Heterosexual men and women attending the sexual health clinic answered a survey using computer-assisted self-interview. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to examine the association between frequent mouthwash use (ie, daily or weekly mouthwash use) and oral sex practices (including tongue kissing, fellatio, cunnilingus and insertive rimming). RESULTS: There were 681 heterosexuals included in the analysis: 315 (46.3%) men and 366 (53.7%) women. Of participants, 302 (44.3%) used mouthwash frequently, 173 (25.4%) used mouthwash infrequently and 206 (30.2%) never used mouthwash. There was no significant difference in the proportion of frequent mouthwash users between men and women (46.4% of men vs 42.6% of women; p=0.329). The proportion of frequent mouthwash users increased with increasing age groups (39.3% in ≤24 years, 45.2% in 25-34 years and 52.8% in ≥35 years or older; ptrend=0.039) with those aged ≥35 years having a 1.80 times (95% CI: 1.12 to 2.89) higher odds of being a frequent mouthwash user than those aged ≤24 years. There were no significant associations between frequent mouthwash users had sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk after adjusting for age and country of birth. CONCLUSION: Older heterosexuals are more likely to use mouthwash. Given the high proportion and associations of mouthwash use in heterosexuals, future investigations related to oral STIs in this group should include mouthwash use.


Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Heterosexualidad , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Antisépticos Bucales , Conducta Sexual , Victoria/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
13.
Sex Transm Infect ; 96(1): 10-18, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31217322

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) coinfection with rectal chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis (CT)) and rectal gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG)) infections and few studies examining the prevalence of pharyngeal Mgen in men who have sex with men (MSM). Using transcription-mediated amplification assay, this study aimed to determine the proportion of rectal CT and rectal NG infections in MSM who are coinfected with rectal Mgen, and the proportion of MSM with Mgen detected in the pharynx in order to inform clinical practice. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Australia. Consecutively collected rectal swabs from MSM that tested positive for CT (n=212) or NG (n=212), and consecutively collected pharyngeal samples (n=480) from MSM were tested for Mgen using the Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Assay (Hologic, San Diego). Samples were linked to demographic data and symptom status. RESULTS: Rectal Mgen was codetected in 27 of 212 rectal CT (13%, 95% CI 9 to 18) and in 29 of 212 rectal NG (14%, 95% CI 9 to 19) samples, with no difference in the proportion positive for Mgen. MSM with rectal CT/Mgen coinfection had more sexual partners than those with rectal CT monoinfection (mean 6 vs 11, p=0.06). MSM with rectal NG/Mgen coinfection were more likely to be HIV-positive than those with rectal NG monoinfection (OR=2.96, 95% CI 1.21 to 7.26, p=0.023). MSM with rectal CT/Mgen coinfection were more likely to be using pre-exposure prophylaxis than MSM with rectal NG/Mgen coinfection (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65, p=0.002). Pharyngeal Mgen was uncommon and detected in 8 of 464 samples (2%, 95% CI 1% to 3%). Pharyngeal Mgen was associated with having a rectal STI (OR=10.61, 95% CI 2.30 to 48.87, p=0.002), and there was a borderline association with being HIV-positive (p=0.079). CONCLUSION: These data indicate one in seven MSM treated for rectal CT or rectal NG will have undiagnosed Mgen that is potentially exposed to azithromycin during treatment of these STIs. Rectal Mgen coinfection was associated with specific risk factors which may inform testing practices. Pharyngeal Mgen was uncommon.


Asunto(s)
Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Recto/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/microbiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/clasificación , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Coinfección/epidemiología , Coinfección/microbiología , Estudios Transversales , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/microbiología , Mycoplasma genitalium/clasificación , Mycoplasma genitalium/genética , Mycoplasma genitalium/aislamiento & purificación , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/clasificación , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Faringe/microbiología , Enfermedades del Recto/microbiología , Conducta Sexual , Adulto Joven
15.
Euro Surveill ; 24(44)2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690365

RESUMEN

BackgroundInternational travel is considered a risk factor for acquiring Chlamydia trachomatis; however, there are little empirical data to support this.AimTo examine the prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infections among heterosexual international travellers (n = 28,786) attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC), Australia, compared to Australian residents (n = 20,614).MethodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional study and analysed sexual behaviours and chlamydia positivity among heterosexual males and females aged ≤ 30 attending MSHC for the first time between January 2007 and February 2017. 'Travellers' were defined as individuals born outside of Australia who had resided in the country < 2 years. Associations between patient characteristics and chlamydia positivity were examined.ResultsChlamydia positivity was higher among travellers (11.2%) compared with Australian residents (8.5%; p < 0.001). Male travellers had higher chlamydia positivity (12.1%) than Australian males (9.3%; p < 0.001), as did female travellers (10.4%) compared with Australian females (7.7%; p < 0.001). Travellers had a higher mean number of sexual partners than Australian residents among males (5.7 vs 4.7; p < 0.001) and females (3.6 vs 3.2; p < 0.001). Travellers from the United Kingdom, Europe, Ireland and New Zealand accounted for 29.6%, 21%, 8.5% and 5.8% of C. trachomatis infections, respectively. Chlamydia in males and females was associated with younger age (≤ 25), inconsistent condom use, a higher number of sexual partners (≥ 4 partners) and being a traveller (p < 0.001).ConclusionsWe found that international travel is an independent risk factor for chlamydia among young heterosexual travellers in Australia, who should therefore be a target group for chlamydia prevention.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Heterosexualidad , Parejas Sexuales , Viaje , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
16.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 22 Suppl 6: e25354, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31468730

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gonorrhoea and chlamydia cases have been rising among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) over the last decade. The majority of cases are extragenital and occur at the oropharynx and anorectum. The aim of this narrative review was to review the risk factors and mode of transmission for gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the oropharynx and anorectum among MSM. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: New evidence suggests that oropharyngeal gonorrhoea can be transmitted by kissing in addition to through the established route of condomless oral sex; and anorectal gonorrhoea can be acquired when saliva is used as a lubricant for anal sex and rimming in addition to the established route of condomless penile-anal sex in MSM. In contrast, condomless penile-anal sex remains the major route for chlamydia transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial transmission of gonorrhoea may occur with practices other than the established routes of condomless oral and/or anal sex and hence condoms may not be effective in preventing gonorrhoea transmission to extragenital sites. In contrast, condoms are effective for chlamydia control because it is mainly transmitted through condomless penile-anal sex. Novel interventions for gonorrhoea that reduce the risk of transmission at extragenital site are required.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/transmisión , Gonorrea/transmisión , Saliva , Condones , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sexual , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Sex Transm Infect ; 95(6): 398-401, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113904

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Victorian legislation requires sex workers to have quarterly screening for genital chlamydia and gonorrhoea, but screening for oropharyngeal infection is not mandatory in Victoria, Australia. In 2017, oropharyngeal screening for gonorrhoea and chlamydia was added as part of the routine quarterly screening for sex workers attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia among female sex workers (FSW). METHODS: We included females who (1) self-identified as sex workers or were attended MSHC for a sex work certificate and (2) had tested for any STI or HIV, between March 2015 and December 2017. The prevalence of HIV, syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhoea was calculated. RESULTS: There were 8538 FSW consultations among 2780 individuals during the study period. There was a twofold increase in genital gonorrhoea (from 0.5% (95% CI 0.3% to 0.9%) to 1.1% (95% CI 0.8% to 1.5%); ptrend=0.047) and a 1.5-fold increase in genital chlamydia (from 2.2% (95% CI 1.6% to 2.8%) to 3.2% (95% CI 2.6% to 3.8%); ptrend=0.031) during the period. Overall, the prevalence of HIV (0.2% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.3%)) and syphilis (0.1% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.2%)) remained low and did not change over time. In 2017, the prevalence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was 2.0% (95% CI 1.6% to 2.6%) and oropharyngeal chlamydia was 2.1% (95% CI 1.6% to 2.7%). Among FSW who were tested positive for gonorrhoea and chlamydia, 55% (n=41) and 34% (n=45) only tested positive in the oropharynx but not genital for gonorrhoea and chlamydia, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia is similar to the prevalence at genital sites and is often independent of genital infection. It is important to test the oropharynx and genital site for chlamydia and gonorrhoea among FSW.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Genitales/microbiología , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Orofaringe/microbiología , Trabajadores Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/microbiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/clasificación , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/microbiología , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/clasificación , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Prevalencia , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Sex Transm Infect ; 94(7): 487-489, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28356437

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report was to raise the issue of the definition and classification of partner terminology in men who have sex with men (MSM) research, particularly in regards to 'fuck buddies'. If definitions in research differ from general consensus in the MSM population, it is possible that public health strategies will be ineffective as the target population may be inaccurate. METHODS: Thirty semistructured interviews with MSM attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre were conducted, focusing on the willingness to change sexual practices to reduce the risk of pharyngeal gonorrhoea. As part of these interviews, men were also asked their views on the terminology they used to describe their relationships and sexual partners. RESULTS: The degree of emotional attachment often defined the type or classification of relationships. There was a consensus among men that partners they engaged with for 'sex only' were classified as casual partners and partners with whom there was an emotional attachment or formalisation of the relationship were classified as 'regular partners'. However, the classification of 'fuck buddy' as a regular or casual partner was less clear. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to ascertain the ways in which men conceptualise sexual relationships and define or classify partner types, particularly 'fuck buddy' relationships. A third category for sexual relationships should be considered to encapsulate fuck buddy relationships.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Sexual/psicología , Salud Sexual , Parejas Sexuales/clasificación , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Apego a Objetos , Asunción de Riesgos , Conducta Sexual/fisiología , Salud Sexual/clasificación , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Int J STD AIDS ; 29(3): 227-236, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764611

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of Fanconi Syndrome (FS) in a cohort of patients taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Clinical records and laboratory investigations from patients receiving TDF between 2002 and 2016 were extracted. FS was defined as normoglycaemic glycosuria and proteinuria and at least one other marker of renal dysfunction. Regression analysis was performed with time to development of FS and the following covariates: ritonavir co-administration, age, gender, co-morbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, viral hepatitis), CD4 cell count nadir and baseline eGFR. One thousand and forty-four patients received TDF without ritonavir and 398 patients with ritonavir. Thirteen cases of FS were identified with a mean duration of exposure of 55 months. The incidence of FS was 1.09/1000PY (0.54-1.63) of TDF exposure (without ritonavir) and 5.50/1000PY (3.66-7.33) of TDF-ritonavir co-administration (p=0.0057). The adjusted hazards ratio for ritonavir co-administration was 4.71 (1.37-16.14, p=0.014). Known risk factors for chronic kidney disease were not associated with development of FS. Ritonavir co-administration, but not other factors, is associated with a greater risk of FS. FS developed late. Known risk factors for chronic kidney disease and length of treatment are not useful for identifying patients most at risk of developing FS in patients taking TDF.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Fanconi/inducido químicamente , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Proteinuria/inducido químicamente , Tenofovir/efectos adversos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Creatinina/orina , Síndrome de Fanconi/complicaciones , Síndrome de Fanconi/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteinuria/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Tenofovir/uso terapéutico
20.
Int J STD AIDS ; 29(4): 362-366, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28835197

RESUMEN

Smartphone dating applications have become a primary source for men who have sex with men (MSM) to meet sexual partners. It has been found that MSM who used smartphone dating applications are at higher risk of gonorrhoea, but the reasons remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether MSM who met their partners via smartphone dating applications are more likely to engage in sexual practices such as rimming (oro-anal sex), and use of partner's saliva as a lubricant, that are associated with the risk of gonorrhoea. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1672 MSM attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia, between 31 July 2014 and 30 June 2015. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine the associations between sources of meeting partners and the two aforementioned sexual practices. MSM who used smartphone dating applications were 1.78 (95% CI: 1.38-2.28) times more likely to get rimmed, and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.27-2.09) times more likely to use partner's saliva as a lubricant during anal sex, compared to other sources, after adjusting for age and other sources for meeting partners. These practices are highly associated with gonorrhoea.


Asunto(s)
Gonorrea/transmisión , Homosexualidad Masculina , Saliva/microbiología , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Parejas Sexuales , Teléfono Inteligente , Adulto , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Lubricantes , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA