An International Registry Study of Early-Stage NSCLC treatment variations (LUCAEUROPE) in Europe and the USA highlighting variations.

OBJECTIVE: Harmonized European NSCLC incidence, treatment approach, and survival based on national tumor registries are unclear. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery has the potential to cure NSCLC and significantly prolong survival. This large-scale international study aimed to investigate treatment variations in Europe and the USA, as well as the determinants for its utilization. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study analyzed data from six European national population-based cancer registries (Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovenia) and the US SEER database from 2010-2015. RESULTS: The study computed cancer incidence, survival, and age-standardized proportions of the use of various therapies. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between resection and demographic and clinical parameters. A total of 428,107 records were analyzed. Among all countries, Estonia had the highest surgical resection rate (79.3 %) and the lowest radiation rate (7.3 %) for stage I patients. The Netherlands had the highest rate of radiotherapy across all years of investigation and the lowest surgery rate between 2012 and 2015. The primary treatment for early-stage NSCLC showed significant international variation, with the USA having a decrease in surgical rates from 67.6 % to 59.5 %. Resection was less frequently performed as tumor stage increased, patients aged, other lung cancer besides adenocarcinoma was present, and when the tumor site overlapped multiple lobes. CONCLUSIONS: Resection rates have declined in some studied European countries and the USA and resection rates vary substantially among countries. Interpretation of current scientific lung cancer evidence and international guidelines results in wide variations in patient treatment.

The Danish lung cancer registry: A nationwide validation study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the validity of the information in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry (DLCR). Since 2000, the DLCR has been a tool for monitoring interventions and outcome of all Danish lung cancer patients with the intent to streamline and improve treatment and survival. The DLCR receives information from the Danish Patient Registries in addition to clinical information from the treating physicians. In the year 2022, more than 50 papers have been published using DLCR as a data source. However, the DLCR has not previously been validated. METHODS: A random sample of 1000 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer from 2014 to 2016 and recorded in the DLCR were included for validation. Medical records were reviewed and were considered as the "gold standard" to which data listed in the DLCR were compared. RESULTS: Information was retrieved from medical charts for all patients. Agreement on stage at diagnosis was 90.1 % (95 % CI 88.0-91.9) and on date of diagnoses was 93.8 (95 % CI 92.1-93.2). Agreement on smoking status in pack years (+/- 10 pack years) was 91.2 % (95 % CI 88.6-93.2). The positive predictive value of treatment intent was 87.4 (95 % CI 85.1-89.6). CONCLUSION: The data in the DLCR are complete, detailed and accurate. The comparison of data from the DLCR with the medical records revealed overall high validity of the data in the registry.