Brain Health After COVID-19, Pneumonia, Myocardial Infarction, or Critical Illness.

Importance: Brain health is most likely compromised after hospitalization for COVID-19; however, long-term prospective investigations with matched control cohorts and face-to-face assessments are lacking. Objective: To assess whether long-term cognitive, psychiatric, or neurological complications among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 differ from those among patients hospitalized for other medical conditions of similar severity and from healthy controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study with matched controls was conducted at 2 academic hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. The case cohort comprised patients with COVID-19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Control cohorts consisted of patients hospitalized for pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or non-COVID-19 intensive care-requiring illness between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, and healthy age- and sex-matched individuals. The follow-up period was 18 months; participants were evaluated between November 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023. Exposures: Hospitalization for COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall cognition, assessed by the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes were executive function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and neurological deficits. Results: The study included 345 participants, including 120 patients with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [14.4] years; 70 men [58.3%]), 125 hospitalized controls (mean [SD] age, 66.0 [12.0] years; 73 men [58.4%]), and 100 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [15.3] years; 46 men [46.0%]). Patients with COVID-19 had worse cognitive status than healthy controls (estimated mean SCIP score, 59.0 [95% CI, 56.9-61.2] vs 68.8 [95% CI, 66.2-71.5]; estimated mean MoCA score, 26.5 [95% CI, 26.0-27.0] vs 28.2 [95% CI, 27.8-28.6]), but not hospitalized controls (mean SCIP score, 61.6 [95% CI, 59.1-64.1]; mean MoCA score, 27.2 [95% CI, 26.8-27.7]). Patients with COVID-19 also performed worse than healthy controls during all other psychiatric and neurological assessments. However, except for executive dysfunction (Trail Making Test Part B; relative mean difference, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.01-1.31]), the brain health of patients with COVID-19 was not more impaired than among hospitalized control patients. These results remained consistent across various sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: This prospective cohort study suggests that post-COVID-19 brain health was impaired but, overall, no more than the brain health of patients from 3 non-COVID-19 cohorts of comparable disease severity. Long-term associations with brain health might not be specific to COVID-19 but associated with overall illness severity and hospitalization. This information is important for putting understandable concerns about brain health after COVID-19 into perspective.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Patients With Unipolar Depression Compared With Healthy Control Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Depression has been associated with alterations in neurotransmitters, hormones, and inflammatory and neurodegenerative biomarkers, and biomarkers quantified in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are more likely to reflect ongoing biochemical changes within the brain. However, a comprehensive overview of CSF biomarkers is lacking and could contribute to the pathophysiological understanding of depression. Objective: To investigate differences in quantified CSF biomarkers in patients with unipolar depression compared with healthy control individuals. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for eligible trials from database inception to August 25, 2021. Study Selection: All studies investigating CSF biomarkers in individuals 18 years and older with unipolar depression and healthy control individuals were included. One author screened titles and abstracts, and 2 independent reviewers examined full-text reports. Studies that did not include healthy control individuals or included control individuals with recent hospital contacts or admissions that might affect CSF biomarker concentrations were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) calculated with random-effects models. A third investigator was consulted if the 2 reviewers reached different decisions or when in doubt. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quantifiable CSF biomarkers. Results: A total of 167 studies met eligibility criteria, and 97 had available data and were included in the meta-analysis. These 97 studies comprised 165 biomarkers, 42 of which were quantified in 2 or more studies. CSF levels of interleukin 6 (7 studies; SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.59; I2 = 16%), total protein (5 studies; SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.72; I2 = 0%), and cortisol (2 studies; SMD, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.57; I2 = 0%) were higher in patients with unipolar depression compared with healthy control individuals, whereas homovanillic acid (17 studies; SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.14; I2 = 11%), γ-aminobutyric acid (4 studies; SMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.08; I2 = 55%), somatostatin (5 studies; SMD, -1.49; 95% CI, -2.53 to -0.45; I2 = 91%), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (3 studies; SMD, -0.58; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.19; I2 = 0%), amyloid-ß 40 (3 studies; SMD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.46; I2 = 0%), and transthyretin (2 studies; SMD, -0.82; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.27; I2 = 0%) were lower. The remaining 33 biomarkers had nonsignificant results. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis point toward a dysregulated dopaminergic system, a compromised inhibitory system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, increased neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability, and impaired neuroplasticity as important factors in depression pathophysiology.

The effect of skatole and androstenone on consumer response towards fresh pork from m. longissimus thoracis et lumborum and m. semimembranosus.

Consumer liking was assessed for boneless chops (m. longissimus thoracis et lumborum) and schnitzels (m. semimembranosus) from castrates and entire male pigs with an androstenone content of up to 9.4 ppm and a skatole content of up to 0.92 ppm in the back fat. Skatole affected both odour and flavour as assessed by trained sensory panellists (P<0.05-P<0.001), while androstenone particularly affected flavour (P<0.01-P<0.001). Furthermore, the skatole compound seemed to be more important in explaining the presence of boar taint in the chops, while androstenone seemed to be more important for the schnitzels. For the chops, tenderness was the most important attribute for consumer liking independently of both the androstenone and skatole contents (P<0.001). Furthermore, increasing contents of both androstenone (P=0.05) and skatole (P=0.04) resulted in a decreased liking of the chops. Skatole was the most important factor regarding consumer response towards the schnitzels (P=0.03). The very low liking scores for both chops and schnitzels were mainly attributable to the androstenone content.