Oxaliplatin-associated shock in stage III colorectal cancer patients: real-world evidence in Taiwan.

Background: Oxaliplatin-associated shock (referred to as shock) is a rare but life-threatening adverse event. Objectives: This pioneering cohort study aimed to quantitatively investigate the association between oxaliplatin use and shock in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC), identify potential independent risk factors for shock, and assess the cycle-to-shock during oxaliplatin treatment. Design: The study utilized a nested case-control (NCC) design to assess the association between oxaliplatin and shock and employed a case-crossover approach to address unmeasured confounders. Methods: All newly diagnosed stage III CRC patients were identified from the CRC Health Database (2012-2016). Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for oxaliplatin's link to shock incidence. Results: Among 6932 oxaliplatin recipients, 331 suffered shock. In all, 3309 controls were selected via risk-set sampling for the shock cases. Oxaliplatin use is associated with a doubled risk of shock (adjusted OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.23-3.52). Two independent risk factors were male sex (adjusted OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05-1.69) and heart diseases (adjusted OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.17-2.32). The case-crossover analysis revealed a more than fourfold risk (OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.67-11.62). In total, 22 of 331 shock cases were exposed to oxaliplatin within 2 days of shock onset, with a median cycle-to-shock time at the seventh cycle. Conclusion: Oxaliplatin use significantly increased shock risk in stage III CRC patients. Male sex and heart disease are two independent risk factors.

This pioneering study identified potential independent risk factors and the cycle-to-shock of oxaliplatin-associated shock which is a rare but life-threatening adverse event Why was the study done? Oxaliplatin-induced anaphylactic shock (referred to as shock) is a rare but life-threatening adverse event which is a harmful and undesirable experience associated with medical care in a patient. What did the researchers do? This pioneering cohort study aimed to quantitatively investigate the association between oxaliplatin use and shock in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC), identify potential independent risk factors for shock and assess the cycle-to-shock during oxaliplatin treatment. All newly diagnosed stage III CRC patients were identified from the CRC Health Database (2012­2016). The study utilized a nested case-control (NCC) design to assess the association between oxaliplatin and shock and employed a case-crossover approach to address unmeasured confounders. Conditional logistic regression was used to quantify the association between oxaliplatin and shock incidence. What did the researchers find? Among 6,932 oxaliplatin recipients, 331 suffered shock. 3,309 controls were selected via risk-set sampling for the shock cases. Oxaliplatin use is associated with a doubled risk of shock. Independent risk factors were male sex and heart diseases. The risk of shock was 33% higher for males and 65% higher for people with heart diseases compared to females and those without heart diseases. The case-crossover analysis revealed a more than four-fold risk of shock of oxaliplatin. Twenty-two of 331 shock cases were exposed to oxaliplatin within two days before the shock onset. The median cycle-to-shock time is at the seventh cycle. What do the findings mean? Oxaliplatin use significantly increased shock risk in stage III CRC patients. Male sex and having heart diseases are two independent risk factors.

Prognostic value of combining clinical factors, 18F-FDG PET-based intensity, volumetric features, and deep learning predictor in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma undergoing targeted therapies: a cross-scanner and temporal validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-based intensity, volumetric features, and deep learning (DL) across different generations of PET scanners in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET of 217 patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma and actionable EGFR mutations who received TKI as first-line treatment. Patients were separated into analog (n = 166) and digital (n = 51) PET cohorts. 18F-FDG PET-derived intensity, volumetric features, ResNet-50 DL of the primary tumor, and clinical variables were used to predict progression-free survival (PFS). Independent prognosticators were used to develop prediction model. Model was developed and validated in the analog and digital PET cohorts, respectively. RESULTS: In the analog PET cohort, female sex, stage IVB status, exon 19 deletion, SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and positive DL prediction independently predicted PFS. The model devised from these six prognosticators significantly predicted PFS in the analog (HR = 1.319, p < 0.001) and digital PET cohorts (HR = 1.284, p = 0.001). Our model provided incremental prognostic value to staging status (c-indices = 0.738 vs. 0.558 and 0.662 vs. 0.598 in the analog and digital PET cohorts, respectively). Our model also demonstrated a significant prognostic value for overall survival (HR = 1.198, p < 0.001, c-index = 0.708 and HR = 1.256, p = 0.021, c-index = 0.664 in the analog and digital PET cohorts, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combining 18F-FDG PET-based intensity, volumetric features, and DL with clinical variables may improve the survival stratification in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving TKI treatment. Implementing the prediction model across different generations of PET scanners may be feasible and facilitate tailored therapeutic strategies for these patients.

Improving platelet function following prophylactic platelet transfusion in patients with hematological malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet transfusion is a standard treatment to prevent bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies. Although transfusions can improve platelet count, their impact on platelet function remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted flow cytometry to assess platelet function before and after transfusion and performed subgroup analyses to examine differences based on blood type, corrected count increment (CCI), and platelet microparticles. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients who received prophylactic platelet transfusion were enrolled. CD42b expression increased, whereas CD41 expression decreased after transfusion. Apheresis platelets exhibited the lowest expression of PAC-1 and P-selectin when exposed to agonist stimulations. PAC-1 expression increased under high adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation, while P-selectin expression increased under both high ADP and thrombin receptor-activating peptide stimulation. In the subgroup analysis, patients with a CCI >4500 and those with the same blood types exhibited a more significant increase in PAC-1 and P-selectin expression under agonist stimulation. When comparing apheresis platelets collected on different days, only the percentage of platelet-derived microparticles showed a significant increase. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic transfusion improved platelet function. Platelet function significantly improved in patients with a CCI >4500, those with the same blood types as that of apheresis platelets, or those with platelet-derived microparticle levels <4.7%. No significant improvement in platelet function was noted after the transfusion of different blood types with acceptable compatibility or the transfusion of incompatible blood types. Our results suggest that transfusing platelets with the same blood type remains the optimal choice.

Effectiveness of Chinese Herbal Medicine as a Complementary Treatment for Neutropenia Prevention and Immunity Modulation During Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Real-World Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, advancements in cancer treatment have enabled cancer cell inhibition, leading to improved patient outcomes. However, the side effects of chemotherapy, especially leukopenia, impact patients' ability to tolerate their treatments and affect their quality of life. Traditional Chinese medicine is thought to provide complementary cancer treatment to improve the quality of life and prolong survival time among patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) as a complementary treatment for neutropenia prevention and immunity modulation during chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We will conduct a real-world pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of CHM as a supplementary therapy to prevent neutropenia in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Patients will be classified into CHM or non-CHM groups based on whether they received CHM during chemotherapy. Using generalized estimating equations or repeated measures ANOVA, we will assess differences in white blood cell counts, absolute neutrophil counts, immune cells, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression levels between the 2 groups. RESULTS: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital (IRB 110-168-A). The enrollment process began in September 2021 and will stop in December 2024. A total of 140 patients will be recruited. Data cleaning and analysis are expected to finish in the middle of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional Chinese medicine is the most commonly used complementary medicine, and it has been reported to significantly alleviate chemotherapy-related side effects. This study's findings may contribute to developing effective interventions targeting chemotherapy-related neutropenia among patients with breast cancer in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry ITMCTR2023000054; https://tinyurl.com/yc353hes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55662.

Dachshund Homolog 1: Unveiling Its Potential Role in Megakaryopoiesis and Bacillus anthracis Lethal Toxin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Lethal toxin (LT) is the critical virulence factor of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax. One common symptom observed in patients with anthrax is thrombocytopenia, which has also been observed in mice injected with LT. Our previous study demonstrated that LT induces thrombocytopenia by suppressing megakaryopoiesis, but the precise molecular mechanisms behind this phenomenon remain unknown. In this study, we utilized 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced megakaryocytic differentiation in human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells to identify genes involved in LT-induced megakaryocytic suppression. Through cDNA microarray analysis, we identified Dachshund homolog 1 (DACH1) as a gene that was upregulated upon TPA treatment but downregulated in the presence of TPA and LT, purified from the culture supernatants of B. anthracis. To investigate the function of DACH1 in megakaryocytic differentiation, we employed short hairpin RNA technology to knock down DACH1 expression in HEL cells and assessed its effect on differentiation. Our data revealed that the knockdown of DACH1 expression suppressed megakaryocytic differentiation, particularly in polyploidization. We demonstrated that one mechanism by which B. anthracis LT induces suppression of polyploidization in HEL cells is through the cleavage of MEK1/2. This cleavage results in the downregulation of the ERK signaling pathway, thereby suppressing DACH1 gene expression and inhibiting polyploidization. Additionally, we found that known megakaryopoiesis-related genes, such as FOSB, ZFP36L1, RUNX1, FLI1, AHR, and GFI1B genes may be positively regulated by DACH1. Furthermore, we observed an upregulation of DACH1 during in vitro differentiation of CD34-megakaryocytes and downregulation of DACH1 in patients with thrombocytopenia. In summary, our findings shed light on one of the molecular mechanisms behind LT-induced thrombocytopenia and unveil a previously unknown role for DACH1 in megakaryopoiesis.

Long-term follow-up of cancer and catastrophic diseases in hematopoietic stem cell donors: a comprehensive matched cohort study.

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, using either bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), is a well-established therapy for various hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. However, the long-term health outcomes after HSC donation remain a major concern for several potential donors. Thus, we aimed to conduct a matched cohort study of 5003 unrelated donors (1099 BM and 3904 PBSC) and randomly selected 50,030 matched controls based on age, sex, and resident area from the donor registry between 1998 and 2018. The medical insurance claims of all the participants were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health and Welfare Data Science Center after de-identification. Our findings revealed no differences in the incidence of cancer, death, and catastrophic diseases between HSC donors and matched healthy participants during long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves depicting the cumulative incidence of cancer and overall mortality throughout the follow-up period also demonstrated similar outcomes between donors and non-donors. In conclusion, our results indicate that HSC donation, whether through BM or PBSC, is safe and not associated with an increased risk of cancer, death, or catastrophic diseases. These findings provide valuable information for counseling potential HSC donors and for long-term management of HSC donor health.