Pituitary Adenoma in the Philippines: A Scoping Review on the Treatment Gaps, Challenges, and Current State of Care.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas are benign brain tumors that impose a heavy burden on patients worldwide. The local burden of disease is yet to be established due to scarcity of data. In line with this, this study aims to present the challenges and gaps in the treatment of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines. METHODS: A scoping review of available relevant literature on epidemiology, clinical experience with treatment, health financing, and healthcare delivery system based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted. RESULTS: The scarcity of updated local clinical data, inequity of distribution of resources, inadequate government support, and lack of affordable diagnostic testing, medications, and neurosurgical procedures are the factors that hinder provision of adequate care of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines. CONCLUSION: There are notable treatment gaps in the management of pituitary adenomas in the Philippines, which may be addressed by strengthening universal healthcare. Strategies to address these gaps were proposed, including improving public-private insurance coverage, increasing manpower, enhancing accessibility to resources, and spreading more awareness.

Protocol for Safety and Efficacy of MLC901 (NeuroAiD II) in Patients With Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial (ANDROMEDA).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability, affecting approximately 69 million individuals each year worldwide. A significant portion of TBI research has focused on treatments for neuroprotection and/or neurorecovery, with most failing to transition to successful clinical applications despite promising animal/in vitro study results. MLC901 (NeuroAiD II), with origins from a traditional Chinese medicine, has been shown to exhibit both neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties in in vitro and animal studies for stroke and TBI. Clinical trials have demonstrated its safety with significant improvements in some functional outcome and cognitive domain measures. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of MLC901 (NeuroAiD II) vs placebo in adult patients with moderate TBI. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial that aims to enroll 120 adult patients with moderate TBI receiving standard of care in 2 arms: MLC901 vs placebo for a treatment period of 6 months with a further follow-up of 3 months. The total duration of the study is 9 months. The primary end point is Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) at 6 months. Other assessments include mortality at 6 months, GOS-E, Glasgow Coma Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Filipino Version, Frontal Assessment Battery Conflicting Instructions and Go-No-Go, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire, Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Health related Quality of life (EQ-5D) at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Cerebral swelling at baseline and at 1 and 2 weeks will also be documented. Adverse events and drug compliance will also be monitored. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We expect to find a significant improvement in functional and cognitive outcomes in patients who were given MLC901. DISCUSSION: Previous studies on the effect of MLC901 in adult patients with moderate TBI showed positive results; However, these studies are limited by the small number of patients. This study will establish a more definitive role of MLC901 in improving functional and cognitive outcomes in patients with moderate TBI.

Intracranial Mass Lesions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients in the Philippines: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system involvement is commonly seen in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, with up to 2%-10% of patients presenting with intracranial mass lesions. The management of these lesions depends largely on their etiology and their relative frequency in the local population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with HIV and evidence of intracranial mass lesions on cranial magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography from 2007 to 2018. Demographic data, clinical features, etiology, surgical management, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The prevalence of intracranial mass lesions in our cohort was 2.2% (45/2032). Patients were predominantly male (98%), with a mean age at diagnosis of 28 years. The most common clinical manifestations were headache (75%), focal weakness (49%), and seizures (32%). The most common diagnoses were toxoplasmic encephalitis (51%) and tuberculosis (24%). Biopsy or excision was performed in 10% of cases, leading to a definitive diagnosis in 60% of these cases. A favorable outcome was observed in 58% of all patients at 46 months median follow-up, with adequate disease-specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of intracranial mass lesions in Filipino patients with HIV is 2.2%. The most common etiology was toxoplasmic encephalitis followed by tuberculosis. These findings are substantially different from other findings reported in the literature and should be considered in formulating guidelines for the Filipino population.

Safety and Outcome of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) is widely recommended as a surgical treatment for intractable increased intracranial pressure after malignant cerebral infarction. Many patients given recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) develop cerebral edema after reperfusion or failed recanalization. However, the safety and efficacy of DH after rtPA administration remain largely unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and HERDIN. Studies were eligible if they included patients who underwent DH after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Unweighted odds ratio (OR) for mortality (primary outcome) and good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-3 or Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4-5 at 3-6 months (secondary outcome) were compared between the DH + rtPA group and DH alone group. RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 98 patients undergoing DH + rtPA were compared with 110 patients undergoing DH alone without previous thrombolysis. Age, vascular risk factors, and cause of stroke were comparable between the 2 groups. Pooled analysis showed that mortality and functional outcomes were not statistically different between the DH + rtPA and DH alone groups (OR, 0.56, P = 0.07 and OR, 0.83, P = 0.30, respectively). Likewise, both minor and major hemorrhagic rates were similar between the 2 groups (37.76% vs. 27.27%; P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: DH for malignant cerebral infarction after intravenous rtPA administration is a viable treatment option, with a comparable mortality and functional outcome to those who had DH without previous thrombolysis.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) effectively alleviates increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Its role in the management of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) however remains uncertain. This study aims to review the efficacy and safety of DH without clot evacuation in SICH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMEd, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library Central Register of Control Trials was performed. Studies were reviewed independently for methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria and end points. Primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoint was functional outcome using modified Rankin scale (mRs) or Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 146 patients who underwent DH without clot evacuation include: 1 RCT, 3 cohort, 2 case series, and 3 case-control studies. Age range was 40-60 years, with majority of patients presenting with a relatively depressed preoperative sensorium (GCS 6-8), large hematoma volumes (>50 mL), and deep locations (basal ganglia and thalamus). Pooled analysis showed a favorable outcome in 53 %, a mortality rate of 26 % and a complication rate of 35.8 %. CONCLUSION: DH without clot evacuation may offer functional and mortality benefit in patients with spontaneous ICH, based on limited and heterogeneous studies.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery in ASEAN countries.

PURPOSE: This survey was performed to determine the availability of epilepsy surgery, and understand the limiting factors to epilepsy surgery in ASEAN countries with total of 640 million population. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was completed by national representatives in all ASEAN countries (Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). RESULTS: Overall facilities for initial epilepsy pre-surgical evaluation are available in most countries, but further non-invasive and invasive investigations are limited. Three countries (Brunei, Cambodia, and East Timor) have no epilepsy center, and 2 countries (Laos, Myanmar) have level 2 centers doing tumor surgery only. Level-3 epilepsy centers are available in 6 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippine, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam); only 5 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippine, Singapore, Thailand) has at least one level-4 epilepsy care facility. Indonesia with 261 million population only has one level 3 and another level 4 center. The costs of presurgical evaluation and brain surgery vary within and among the countries. The main barriers towards epilepsy surgery in ASEAN include lack of expertise, funding and facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Epilepsy surgery is underutilized in ASEAN with low number of level 3 centers, and limited availability of advanced presurgical evaluation. Lack of expertise, facilities and funding may be the key factors contributing to the underutilization.