Positivity for SATB2 distinguishes Islet1 positive rectal neuroendocrine tumours from pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumours.

AIMS: Determining the site of origin of a metastatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) can be challenging and has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. An immunohistochemical (IHC) panel consisting of TTF1, CDX2, PAX8/PAX6 and Islet1 is often employed. However, there can be a significant IHC overlap among different primary sites. Herein, we sought to determine the utility of including Special AT-rich sequence binding protein-2 (SATB2) in the IHC panel that is used for determining the site of origin of a metastatic NET. METHODS: Paraffin tissue microarrays consisting of 137 primary NETs (26 lung, 22 jejunoileal, 8 appendix, 5 stomach, 4 duodenum, 17 rectum and 55 pancreas) were stained for SATB2, in addition to the well-described lineage-associated markers, such as TTF1, CDX2, PAX6 and Islet1. Additionally, a tissue microarray consisting of 21 metastatic NETs (1 lung, 1 stomach, 8 jejunoileal and 11 pancreas) was stained for TTF1, CDX2, SATB2 and Islet1. The results were recorded as no staining, weak staining and moderate to strong staining. RESULTS: All appendiceal NETs and majority (88%) of the rectal NETs were positive for SATB2. All primary foregut NETs (stomach, pancreas, duodenum and lung) were negative for SATB2, except for one pulmonary NET with weak staining. However, among the metastatic tumours, 5 of 11 pancreatic NETs, 1 stomach NET, 1 lung NET and 2 of 8 jejunoileal NETs showed weak staining. Receiver operating characteristic analysis incorporating sensitivity and specificity data of IHC panel, considering moderate to strong staining as truly positive cases, showed that inclusion of SATB2 to the previously described NET IHC panel outperformed the panel without SATB2, raising the specificity for pancreaticoduodenal NETs from 81.2% to 100%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.22% (p<0.0001); for appendiceal NETs the specificity changed from 99.1% to 98.5% and sensitivity increased from 11.8% to 80%, with a PPV and NPV of 66.67% and 99.26%, respectively (p<0.0001); and for rectal NETs the specificity increased from 97.6% to 99.3% and sensitivity raised from 7.1% to 66.7%, with a PPV and NPV of 80% and 98.53%, respectively (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SATB2 stain is useful in differentiatingIslet1/PAX6 positive pancreatic and rectal NETs, as rectal NETs are typically moderately to strongly positive for SATB2 and pancreatic NETs are usually negative or weakly positive for SATB2. Moderate to strong staining for SATB2 is suggestive of an appendiceal or a rectal primary. SATB2 may complement the panel of CDX2, TTF1 and Islet1 in determining the site of origin of an NET in a metastatic setting.

High-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: Significant correlation of histologic patterns with IMP3 and E-Cadherin predicting disease recurrence and survival.

Most high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) of the ovary are advanced stage tumors with early recurrences. However, some tumors do not recur and have a better survival. We identified such cases of HGSC and compared those with the cases that recurred and assessed the relationship between patterns of invasion (intracystic, IC; micropapillary, MP; nonpapillary, NP) with IMP3 and E-Cadherin expression, and evaluated their predictive role in recurrence and survival. The study comprised of seventeen tumors recurred within 18 months of follow-up and 14 cases that did not recur with a minimum follow-up of 49 months. 73% tumors with predominantly MP pattern recurred, while only 27% of non-recurrent tumors showed this pattern. In contrast, predominant NP and IC patterns were seen in 71% of the non-recurrent and in 35% of recurrent tumors. 67.7% tumors expressed IMP3 and all cases expressed E-Cadherin. The tumors with a higher percentage of destructive invasion showed higher IMP3 positivity and greater chances of recurrence, whereas tumors with higher percentage of pushing invasion showed lower IMP3 positivity and lesser chances of recurrence (p = 0.02). IMP3-negative tumors had lower odds of recurrence than IMP3-positive ones (p = 0.01). The patients with negative IMP3 staining had a significantly higher OS than those with IMP3 positive tumors (p = 0.01), regardless of the histologic patterns. Also, reduction in E-Cadherin staining in the metastatic site led to poor DFS (p = 0.016) and OS (p = 0.006). IMP3 may serve as a useful prognostic marker that can stratify patients of advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinomas into two distinct subsets: majority with early recurrence with an infiltrative pattern of invasion and IMP3 positivity particularly in the MP areas; and a smaller subset that do not show early recurrence having pushing borders and are IMP3 negative. Also, E-Cadherin showed significant decrease in expression in the metastatic site of the recurrent cases.