Cerebrospinal fluid and blood serum biomarkers in neurodegenerative proteinopathies: A prospective, open, cross-correlation study.

Neurodegenerative diseases are a broad heterogeneous group affecting the nervous system. They are characterized, from a pathophysiological perspective, by the selective involvement of a subpopulation of nerve cells with a consequent clinical picture of a disease. Clinical diagnoses of neurodegenerative diseases are quite challenging and often not completely accurate because of their marked heterogeneity and frequently overlapping clinical pictures. Efforts are being made to define sufficiently specific and sensitive markers for individual neurodegenerative diseases or groups of diseases in order to increase the accuracy and speed of clinical diagnosis. Thus said, this present research aimed to identify biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum (α-synuclein [α-syn], tau protein [t-tau], phosphorylated tau protein [p-tau], ß-amyloid [Aß], clusterin, chromogranin A [chromogrA], cystatin C [cyst C], neurofilament heavy chains [NFH], phosphorylated form of neurofilament heavy chains [pNF-H], and ratio of tau protein/amyloid beta [Ind tau/Aß]) that could help in the differential diagnosis and differentiation of the defined groups of α-synucleinopathies and four-repeat (4R-) tauopathies characterized by tau protein isoforms with four microtubule-binding domains. In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 229 patients divided into four groups: (1) Parkinson's disease (PD) + dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (n = 82), (2) multiple system atrophy (MSA) (n = 25), (3) progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) + corticobasal syndrome (CBS) (n = 30), and (4) healthy controls (HC) (n = 92). We also focused on analyzing the biomarkers in relation to each other with the intention of determining whether they are useful in distinguishing among individual proteinopathies. Our results indicate that the proposed set of biomarkers, when evaluated in CSF, is likely to be useful for the differential diagnosis of MSA versus 4RT. However, these biomarkers do not seem to provide any useful diagnostic information when assessed in blood serum.

Deep brain stimulation electrode position impact on parkinsonian non-motor symptoms.

BACKGROUND: In this study we evaluated the impact of location of deep brain stimulation electrode active contact in different parts of the subthalamic nucleus on improvement of non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: The subthalamic nucleus was divided into two (dorsolateral/ventromedial) and three (dorsolateral, medial, ventromedial) parts. 37 deep brain stimulation electrodes were divided according to their active contact location. Correlation between change in non-motor symptoms before and one and four months after deep brain stimulation electrode implantation and the location of active contact was made. RESULTS: In dividing the subthalamic nucleus into three parts, no electrode active contact was placed ventromedially, 28 active contacts were located in the medial part and 9 contacts were placed dorsolaterally. After one and four months, no significant difference was found between medial and dorsolateral positions. In the division of the subthalamic nucleus into two parts, 13 contacts were located in the ventromedial part and 24 contacts were placed in the dorsolateral part. After one month, significantly greater improvement in the Non-motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson's disease (P=0.045) was found on dorsolateral left-sided stimulation, but no significant differences between the ventromedial and dorsolateral positions were found on the right side. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the relationship between improvement of non-motor symptoms and the side (hemisphere, left/right) of the deep brain stimulation electrode active contact, rather than its precise location within specific parts of the subthalamic nucleus in patients treated for advanced Parkinson's disease.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid in Parkinson's Disease and Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Various cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are studied in Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS). Several studies found reduced 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), the main serotonin metabolite, in PD. There is little evidence regarding its levels in APS. METHODS: We measured 5-HIAA in the CSF of 90 PD patients, 16 MSA patients, 26 progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) patients, 11 corticobasal syndrome (CBS) patients, and 31 controls. We also compared the values in depressed and nondepressed patients. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in CSF 5-HIAA in PD and MSA compared to the control group (median in PD 15.8 µg/L, in MSA 13.6 µg/L vs. 24.3 µg/L in controls; p = 0.0008 in PD, p = 0.006 in MSA). There was no statistically significant difference in CSF 5-HIAA in PSP and CBS compared to the control group (median in PSP 22.7 µg/L, in CBS 18.7 µg/L vs. 24.3 µg/L in controls; p = 1 in both PSP and CBS). CSF 5-HIAA levels were lower in PD patients with depression compared to PD patients without depression (median 8.34 vs. 18.48, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CSF 5-HIAA is decreased in PD and MSA. The CSF 5-HIAA levels in PSP and CBS did not differ from those of the control group. There was a tendency toward lower CSF 5-HIAA in MSA than in PD; however, the results did not reach statistical significance. These results may be explained by more severe damage of the serotonergic system in synucleinopathies (PD and MSA) than in tauopathies (PSP and CBS).

Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of Chromogranin A in Parkinson's Disease and Multiple System Atrophy.

BACKGROUND: Chromogranin A (CgA) and other peptides from the chromogranin-secretogranin family have been recently studied as potential biomarkers of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: We measured CgA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 119 PD patients, 18 multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients, and 31 age-matched controls. We also correlated the values with disease duration and levodopa dose equivalent. RESULTS: In the PD patients, CSF CgA tended to be lower than the control group (median 124.5 vs. 185.2 µg/L; p = 0.057); however, the results did not reach statistical significance. CSF CgA levels in MSA were significantly lower compared to the control group (median 104.4 vs. 185.2; p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in CSF CgA between PD and MSA patients (p = 0.372). There was no association between CSF CgA and disease duration or levodopa dose equivalent in PD or in MSA. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a tendency toward lower CSF CgA levels in both PD and MSA compared to the control group; however, the difference reached statistical significance only in MSA. Based on these results, CgA may have potential as a biomarker in PD and MSA, but further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed to draw conclusions.