2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups. RESULTS: Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: After a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.

Posterior left atrial isolation is associated with a lower incidence of atrial tachycardia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients may develop atrial tachycardia (AT) after left atrial (LA) ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The population consisted of 101 consecutive patients (age = 64.3 ± 8.7 years, 70 males (69%), LA = 4.6 ± 0.8 cm, ejection fraction = 48.5 ± 16%) undergoing their initial procedure for persistent AF. After pulmonary vein isolation, patients either underwent posterior LA isolation (n = 50; study group) or linear ablation at the LA roof with verification of conduction block (n = 51; control group). RESULTS: A repeat procedure was performed in 17 (34%) and 28 (55%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients in the study group were less likely to develop AT (9/50 [18%] vs. 18/51 [35%]; p = 0.02), roof-dependent (1/50 [2%] vs. 8/51 [16%]; p = 0.008), and multi-loop AT (6/50 [12%] vs. 14/51 [27%]; p = 0.03) as compared to controls. Among various factors, only posterior LA isolation was associated with a lower likelihood of AT recurrence and roof tachycardia at redo procedure (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.00, p = 0.05, and OR, 0.1, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96; p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, posterior LA isolation is associated with a lower risk of a redo procedure, roof-dependent macro-reentry, and post-ablation AT in general as compared to controls who only received roof ablation. Posterior LA isolation also obviates the need for pacing maneuvers, and may be a more definitive endpoint than linear ablation at the LA roof.

Incidental left atrial appendage isolation after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and long-term risk of thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation may occur during radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aims to describe the mechanisms and long-term thromboembolic risk related to incidental LAA isolation. METHODS: Patients who experienced incidental LAA isolation after AF ablation were included. Culprit sites where ablation resulted in LAA isolation were identified. Thromboembolic risk despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) was compared to that in a propensity-matched control group without LAA isolation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with LAA isolation, and 82 matched patients without LAA isolation were included. The patient age, ejection fraction, LA diameter, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were 64 ± 11 years, 55 ± 12%, 45.0 ± 7 mm and 2.62 ± 1.5, respectively. Culprit sites included the LAA base, mitral isthmus, inferior LA, Bachmann's bundle, coronary sinus, and Marshall vein. After 4.2 ± 3.6 years follow-up, thromboembolism occurred in 7 of 41 patients (17%) with LAA isolation versus 3 of 82 patients (4%) without isolation (log rank p < .009, HR 5.14, 95% CI [1.32-19.94], p = .02). Patients with and without thromboembolism had similar CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores (2.65 ± 1.3 vs. 2.71 ± 0.76, p = .89). Thromboembolism occurred during noncompliance with or temporary discontinuation of OAC in four of the seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental LAA isolation may occur during ablation of atrial arrhythmias in the vicinity of, or even at sites remote from the appendage. Patients with incidental LAA isolation had higher rates of thromboembolism compared to patients without isolation. Since thromboembolism may occur despite prescription for OAC, the risks of LAA isolation must be weighed against clinical benefit and appendage occlusion devices should be considered in vulnerable patients.

Three-dimensional-guided and ICE-guided transseptal puncture for cardiac ablations: A propensity score match study.

INTRODUCTION: Transseptal puncture (TSP) is routinely performed for left atrial ablation procedures. The use of a three-dimensional (3D) mapping system or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is useful in localizing the fossa ovalis and reducing fluoroscopy use. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between 3D mapping system-guided TSP and ICE-guided TSP techniques. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients undergoing TSP for left atrial catheter ablation procedures (mostly atrial fibrillation ablation). Propensity scoring was used to match patients undergoing 3D-guided TSP with patients undergoing ICE-guided TSP. Logistic regression was used to compare the clinical data, procedural data, fluoroscopy time, success rate, and complications between the groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients underwent 3D-guided TSP, and 151 propensity score-matched patients underwent ICE-guided TSP. The TSP success rate was 100% in both the 3D-guided and ICE-guided groups. Median needle time was 4.00 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.57-5.08) in patients with 3D-guided TSP compared to 4.02 min (IQR: 2.83-6.95) in those with ICE-guided TSP (p = .22). Mean fluoroscopy time was 0.2 min (IQR: 0.1-0.4) in patients with 3D-guided TSP compared to 1.2 min (IQR: 0.7-2.2) in those with ICE-guided TSP (p < .001). There were no complications related to TSP in both group. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional mapping-guided TSP is as safe and effective as ICE-guided TSP without additional cost.

A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia (GA) can be used during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, each approach may have advantages and disadvantages with variability in operator preferences. The optimal approach has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to compare procedural efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, and cost of CA for AF performed with MAC versus GA. METHODS: The study population consisted of 810 consecutive patients (mean age: 63 ± 10 years, paroxysmal AF: 48%) who underwent a first CA for AF. All patients completed a preprocedural evaluation by the anesthesiologists. Among the 810 patients, MAC was used in 534 (66%) and GA in 276 (34%). Ten patients (1.5%) had to convert to GA during the CA. RESULTS: Although the total anesthesia care was longer with GA particularly in patients with persistent AF, CA was shorter by 5 min with GA than MAC (p < 0.01). Prevalence of perioperative complications was similar between the two groups (4% vs. 4%, p = 0.89). There was no atrioesophageal fistula with either approach. GA was associated with a small, ~7% increase in total charges due to longer anesthesia care. During 43 ± 17 months of follow-up after a single ablation procedure, 271/534 patients (51%) in the MAC and 129/276 (47%) patients in the GA groups were in sinus rhythm without concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: With the participation of an anesthesiologist, and proper preoperative assessment, CA of AF using GA or MAC has similar efficacy and safety.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation in young adults with atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: We aim to describe the long-term safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) in young patients (<30 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients aged 18-30 who underwent CA for AF, and clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes are reported. Survival analyses were performed between the study group and a propensity-matched older cohort (>30 years, mean age: 58±10 years). RESULTS: From January 2000 to January 2019, a 1st CA (radiofrequency energy n=72, cryoballoon n=10), was performed in 82 patients (mean age 26±4 years, paroxysmal n=61, persistent n=14, longstanding persistent n=7), among 6336 consecutive patients with AF. During a follow-up of 5±5 years, 56% and 30% of the patients with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF were arrhythmia free without antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy after a single CA (P=0.02). After 1.5±0.8 CA procedures, 76% and 75% of the patients with paroxysmal AF and non-paroxysmal AF were arrhythmia free without AADs (P=0.54). Compared to a propensity-matched group of older patients, young patients were as likely to remain in sinus rhythm after CA (P=0.47), however after fewer repeat CAs (1.5±0.8 vs 1.9±0.9, P<0.009). There were no long-term adverse outcomes associated with CA. CONCLUSIONS: CA is a safe and effective treatment of AF in young patients with comparable outcomes to the older patients, however after fewer procedures.

Efficacy and tolerability of quinidine as salvage therapy for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Quinidine is an effective therapy for a subset of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VF) syndromes; however, the efficacy of quinidine in scar-related monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2020 a single VT referral center, a total of 23 patients with MMVT and structural heart disease (age 66.7 ± 10.9, 20 males, 15 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, mean LVEF 22.2 ± 12.3%, 9 with left ventricular assist device [LVAD]) were treated with quinidine (14 quinidine gluconate; 996 ± 321 mg, 8 quinidine sulfate; 1062 ± 588 mg). Quinidine was used in combination with other antiarrhythmics (AAD) in 19 (13 also on amiodarone). All patients previously failed >1 AAD (amiodarone 100%, mexiletine 73%, sotalol 32%, other 32%) and eight had prior ablations (median of 1.5). Quinidine was initiated in the setting of VT storm despite AADs (6), inability to tolerate other AADs (4), or recurrent VT(12). Ventricular arrhythmias recurred despite quinidine in 13 (59%) patients at a median of 26 (4-240) days after quinidine initiation. In patients with recurrent MMVT, VT cycle length increased from 359 to 434 ms (p = .02). Six (27.3%) patients remained on quinidine at 1 year with recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in all. The following adverse effects were seen: gastrointestinal side effects (6), QT prolongation (2), rash (1), thrombocytopenia (1), neurologic side effects (1). One patient discontinued due to cost. CONCLUSION: Quinidine therapy has limited tolerability and long-term efficacy when used in the management of amiodarone-refractory scar-related MMVT.

Mapping and ablation of post-AF atrial tachycardias.

Atrial tachycardias are commonly encountered in patients undergoing catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Unlike typical atrial flutter that can be readily recognized and ablated, these post-AF tachycardias can arise from a wide variety of locations and involve a multiplicity of mechanisms. Apart from diagnostic challenges, radiofrequency ablation to eliminate the tachycardias may require multiple approaches. In addition, specialized techniques such as epicardial and chemical ablation may be required for definitive treatment. This review describes the various mechanisms and approaches to mapping and ablation of these challenging tachycardias.

Comparative Efficacy of Dofetilide Versus Amiodarone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The study's goal was to compare the efficacy and safety of dofetilide (DOF) versus amiodarone (AMIO) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Comparative efficacy of DOF versus AMIO in patients with AF has not been well established. In addition, proarrhythmia has been a concern with DOF therapy. METHODS: Rhythm control was attempted by using DOF in 657 consecutive patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years; 35% women) with AF (n = 528) or atrial flutter and AF (n = 129) between January 2014 and December 2018. RESULTS: DOF was successfully initiated in 573 (87%) of 657 patients, including 510 (89%) with persistent AF and 63 (11%) with paroxysmal AF. During a mean follow-up of 19 ± 7 months, sinus rhythm was maintained in 361 (63%) of the 573 DOF-treated patients. At 12 months, patients on DOF had a similar likelihood of experiencing recurrent atrial arrhythmias compared with the 2,476 consecutive patients treated with AMIO for rhythm control during the study period (37% vs. 39%; p = 0.56). The efficacy of DOF and AMIO was also similar in specific subgroups of patients, including patients >75 years of age, with a low left ventricular ejection fraction, obesity, renal insufficiency, and prior catheter ablation for AF. Among patients with atypical atrial flutter, likelihood of recurrent atrial flutter was similar between the DOF (43 of 108 [40%]) and AMIO (211 of 555 [38%]; p = 0.69) groups. CONCLUSIONS: When properly initiated and monitored, DOF has efficacy comparable to that of amiodarone for rhythm control in patients with AF.

Lead damage after cardiac implantable device replacement procedure: Comparison between electrical plasma tool and electrocautery.

BACKGROUND: Lead damage is a complication caused by lead manipulation or heating damage from conventional electrocautery (EC) after cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement. Application of electrical plasma (PEAK PlasmaBlade) is a new technology that reportedly reduces this risk. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the effect of EC versus PEAK PlasmaBlade on lead parameters and complications after generator replacement procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 410 consecutive patients (840 leads) who underwent CIED replacement using EC (EC group) and 410 consecutive patients (824 leads) using PEAK PlasmaBlade (PlamaBlade group). Pacing lead impedance, incidence of lead damage, and complications were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Lead impedance increased in 393 leads (46.8%) in the EC group versus 282 leads (34.2%) in the PlasmaBlade group (p < .01) with average percent changes of 6.7% and 4.0% (p < .01), respectively. Lead impedance decreased in 438 leads (52.1%) in the EC group versus 507 leads (61.5%) in the PlasmaBlade group (p < .01) with average percent changes of -5.7% and -7.1% (p < .01), respectively. Lead damage requiring lead revision occurred in five leads (0.6%) or after five procedures (1.2%) in the EC group compared to three leads (0.4%, p = .50) or after three procedures (0.7%, p = .48) in the PlasmaBlade group. There were no significant differences in the procedural-related complications between the EC group (nine patients, 2.2%) and the PlasmaBlade group (five patients, 1.2%, p = .28). CONCLUSION: Conventional electrocautery can potentially damage lead insulations. However, this study shows that when used carefully electrocautery is as safe as the PEAK PlasmaBlade™.

Effect of metformin on outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). The effect of antidiabetic medications on AF or the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) has not been well described. We sought to determine whether metformin treatment is associated with a lower risk of atrial arrhythmias after CA in patients with DM and AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A first CA was performed in 271 consecutive patients with DM and AF (age: 65 ± 9 years, women: 34%; and paroxysmal AF: 51%). At a median of 13 months after CA (interquartile range: 6-30), 100/182 patients (55%) treated with metformin remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drug therapy, compared with 36/89 patients (40%) not receiving metformin (p = .03). There was a significant association between metformin therapy and freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias after CA in multivariable Cox hazards models (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66; ±95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.98; p = .04) that adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, AF type (paroxysmal vs. nonparoxysmal), antiarrhythmic medication, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial diameter. A Cox model that also incorporated other antidiabetic agents and fasting blood glucose demonstrated a similar reduction in the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias with metformin treatment (HR: 0.63; ±95% CI: 0.42-0.96; p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DM, treatment with metformin appears to be independently associated with a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias after CA for AF. Whether this effect is due to glycemic control or pleiotropic effects on electroanatomical mechanisms of AF remains to be determined.

Catheter ablation of the left and right atrial appendages without isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) improves outcomes of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) but may increase the risk of thromboembolism. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a method to map and ablate appendage drivers without complete electrical isolation. METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients underwent an ablation procedure for persistent AF. The procedure was performed during AF and consisted of pulmonary vein and posterior LA isolation as well as ablation of the LAA. The right atrium (RA) was targeted in patients with a right-to-left gradient in cycle length (CL). The end point of appendage ablation was CL slowing or AF termination but not complete isolation. RESULTS: Among the 113 patients (mean age 64.6 ± 8.6 years; ejection fraction 54% ± 13%; LA diameter 46 ± 6.5 mm), radiofrequency ablation terminated AF in 51 patients (45%). RA ablation was performed in 41 patients (36%) at the index or repeat procedure. The mean AF CL in the RA appendage (RAA) was shorter than that in the LAA (160 ± 32 ms vs 186 ± 29 ms; P < .01) in these patients. The most frequent target in the RA was the RAA (CLs approaching 50-60 ms). Discontinuing radiofrequency ablation upon AF termination or conduction slowing prevented LAA isolation. After a mean follow-up of 24 ± 15 months, 89 patients (78%) remained arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmic medications. CONCLUSION: An ablation strategy guided by the AF CL addresses LAA drivers without complete electrical isolation and also helps identify the RAA as a source of persistent AF.

Baseline and decline in device-derived activity level predict risk of death and heart failure in patients with an ICD for primary prevention.

BACKGROUND: Implanted defibrillators are capable of recording activity data based on company-specific proprietary algorithms. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of baseline and decline in device-derived activity level across different device companies in the real world. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (n = 280) who underwent a defibrillator implantation (Boston, Medtronic, St. Jude, and Biotronik) for primary prevention at the University of Michigan from 2014 to 2016. Graphical data obtained from device interrogations were retrospectively converted to numerical data. The activity level averaged over a month from a week postimplantation was used as baseline. Subsequent weekly average activity levels (SALs) were standardized to this baseline. SAL below 59.4% was used as a threshold to group patients. All-cause mortality and death/heart failure were the primary end-points of this study. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients died in this study. On average, they experienced a 50% decline in SAL prior to death. Patients (n = 129) who dropped their SAL below threshold were more likely to be older, male, diabetic, and have more symptomatic heart failure. They also had a significantly increased risk of heart failure/death (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.3-5.8, P < .0001) or death (HR 4.2, 95% CI 2.2-7.7, P < .0001) compared to those who had sustained activity levels. Lower baseline activity level was also associated with significantly increased risk of heart failure/death and death. CONCLUSION: Significant decline in device-derived activity level and low baseline activity level are associated with increased mortality and heart failure in patients with an ICD for primary prevention.