Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Vitam Nutr Res ; 90(1-2): 49-58, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987550

RESUMEN

Vitamin D deficiency commonly occurs in chronic heart failure. Whether additional vitamin D supplementation can be beneficial to adults with chronic heart failure remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on September 8, 2016. Seven randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of vitamin D on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with chronic heart failure, and comprised 592 patients, were included in the analysis. Compared to placebo, vitamin D, at doses ranging from 2,000 IU/day to 50,000 IU/week, could not improve left ventricular ejection fraction (Weighted mean difference, WMD = 3.31, 95% confidence interval, CL = -0.93 to 7.55, P < 0.001, I2 = 92.1%); it also exerts no beneficial effects on the 6 minute walk distance (WMD = 18.84, 95% CL = -24.85 to 62.52, P = 0.276, I2 = 22.4%) and natriuretic peptide (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.39, 95% confidence interval CL = -0.48 to 0.69, P < 0.001, I2 = 92.4%). However, a dose-response analysis from two studies demonstrated an improved left ventricular ejection fraction with vitamin D at a dose of 4,000 IU/day (WMD = 6.58, 95% confidence interval CL = -4.04 to 9.13, P = 0.134, I2 = 55.4%). The results showed that high dose vitamin D treatment could potentially benefit adults with chronic heart failure, but more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this result.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Deficiencia de Vitamina D , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Vitamina D/química , Vitamina D/farmacología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitaminas/química , Vitaminas/farmacología
2.
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma ; (12): 739-742, 2019.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-800711

RESUMEN

Objective@#To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of priming regimen with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the treatment of initial treatment elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).@*Methods@#Thirty-five elderly patients with early-stage AML (non-M3) who received pre-excitation chemotherapy in Yancheng Third People's Hospital from February 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the chemotherapy regimen, 15 cases were in PEG-rhG-CSF group, 6 mg PEG-rhG-CSF was used alone on day 0 by subcutaneous injection; 20 cases were in recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) group, 200 μg/m2 rhG-CSF was used per day from day 0 to day 13 by subcutaneous injection, rhG-CSF was suspended or continued according to the number of white blood cells. In addition, both groups were given priming regimen with cytarabine and arubicin, or cytarabine and harringtonine. The efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared.@*Results@#In the PEG-rhG-CSF group, there were 5 cases of complete remission, 6 cases of partial remission, 4 cases of non-remission, and 11 cases were effective. In the rhG-CSF group, there were 8 cases of complete remission, 7 cases of partial remission, 5 cases of non-remission, and 15 cases were effective. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two groups (χ 2= 0.012, P= 0.911). In terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of infectious fever, bone pain, duration of neutropenia, and duration of thrombocytopenia were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05).@*Conclusions@#In the pre-excitation chemotherapy for AML, the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of PEG-rhG-CSF are similar to rhG-CSF. However, the use of PEG-rhG-CSF can simplify the operation and reduce the pain and risk of local infection during chemotherapy.

3.
Clin Exp Hypertens ; 40(6): 501-508, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29624472

RESUMEN

To provide definite evidence for the anti-hypertensive benefit of Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) for resistant hypertension, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently determined the eligibility of studies and extracted the data. The quality of all included studies was evaluated by the use of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Disagreements were settled through discussion. Twelve studies, included one randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and eleven prospective studies were eligible for qualitative analysis and five prospective studies were selected for meta-analysis. The data of analysis showed office systolic blood pressure (SBP)(WMD = -24.01, 95% CI = -28.65 to -19.36, P= 0.753I2 = 0.0%) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)(WMD = -12.53, 95% CI = -15.82 to -9.24,P = 0.893,I2 = 0.893) decreased by BAT treatment.The effect on SBP was both significant in the Barostim neo TM device (WMD = -22.49, 95% CI = -29.13 to 15.84, P= 0.443; I2 = 0.0%) and Rheos System (WMD = 25.46, 95% CI = -31.96 to -18.96, P= 0.703; I2 = 0.0%). Our study found office BP were significantly decreased by BAT treatment, but available evidence is limited by risk of bias, small sample size, and few RCTs. Thus, there is presently insufficient evidence to fully evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT for Patients with Resistant Hypertension. Additional high-quality RCT research with long-term follow-up is required.


Asunto(s)
Barorreflejo , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Hipertensión/terapia , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Chinese Journal of Hematology ; (12): 602-606, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-809052

RESUMEN

Objective@#To describe the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens at hematology department of Jiangsu Province from 2014 to 2015 to provide reference for empirical anti-infection treatment.@*Methods@#Pathogens were from hematology department of 26 tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province from 2014 to 2015. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out according to a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method or agar dilution method. Collection of drug susceptibility results and corresponding patient data were analyzed.@*Results@#The separated pathogens amounted to 4 306. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 64.26%, while the proportions of gram-positive bacteria and funguses were 26.99% and 8.75% respectively. Common gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli (20.48%) , Klebsiella pneumonia (15.40%) , Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.50%) , Acinetobacter baumannii (5.04%) and Stenotropho-monas maltophilia (3.41%) respectively. CRE amounted to 123 (6.68%) . Common gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (4.92%) , Staphylococcus hominis (4.88%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (4.71%) respectively. Candida albicans were the main fungus which accounted for 5.43%. The rates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia resistant to carbapenems were 3.5%-6.1% and 5.0%-6.3% respectively. The rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to tobramycin and amikacin were 3.2% and 3.3% respectively. The resistant rates of Acinetobacter baumannii towards tobramycin and cefoperazone/sulbactam were both 19.2%. The rates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia resistant to minocycline and sulfamethoxazole were 3.5% and 9.3% respectively. The rates of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis resistant wards vancomycin were 0, 6.4% and 1.4% respectively; also, the rates of them resistant to linezolid were 1.2%, 0 and 1.6% respectively; in addition, the rates of them resistant to teicoplanin were 2.8%, 14.3% and 8.0% respectively. Furthermore, MRSA accounted for 39.15% (83/212) .@*Conclusions@#Pathogens were mainly gram-negative bacteria. CRE accounted for 6.68%. The rates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia resistant to carbapenems were lower compared with other antibacterial agents. The rates of gram-positive bacteria resistant to vancomycin, linezolid and teicoplanin were still low. MRSA accounted for 39.15%.

5.
Springerplus ; 5(1): 1117, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27478734

RESUMEN

Reperfusion therapy is the most crucial strategy for rescuing ischemic myocardium and reducing infarction size. Cyclosporine A (CsA) can protect against reperfusion-induced myocardial necrosis. However, the clinical effects of CsA on myocardial infarction (MI) remain uncertain. This study investigated the effects of CsA on reperfusion injury (RI) in MI. We searched for and included articles regarding randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of CsA in patients with MI from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for an analysis. We then performed quality assessment, subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses. Of the 277 potentially relevant articles retrieved from the databases, only five were eligible for our meta-analysis. Compared with the placebos used in these studies, CsA did not reduce all-cause mortality [rate ratio (RR) 1.10, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.61; P = 0.533; I (2) = 0 %) or adverse clinical events (RR 1.0, 95 % CI 0.89-1.13; P = 0.381; I (2) = 6.5 %). In the CsA treatment groups, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (weighted mean difference = 1.91; 95 % CI 0.89, 2.92; P = 0.064) and reduction in MI size (standard mean difference = -0.41, 95 % CI -0.84 to 0.02; P = 0.519; I (2) = 0.0 %) were minimal. The current meta-analysis indicates that CsA treatment does not reduce all-cause mortality and adverse clinical events in MI and that CsA may not have significant clinical effects on RI in MI.

6.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 9-11, 2016.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-493687

RESUMEN

Objective To study of zoledronic acid in the treatment of multiple myeloma bone dis-ease clinical effect and detection of serum macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)changes of primary mye-loma (mm)in patients with serum macrophage inflammatory protein levels and multiple myeloma bone dis-ease curative effect.Methods 48 cases of multiple myeloma bone disease patients were treated with VTD regimen chemotherapy were randomly and equally divided into two groups,one group (group A)chemother-apy intermission applied zoledronic acid 4 mg per month 1 time,treatment 2 course of treatment,observa-tion of curative effect and adverse reaction,another group (B group)declined to azole phosphonic acid treatment.Results Group of pain Solution of 16 cases were markedly effective,effective in 4 cases,4 ca-ses were ineffective,efficiency 83.3%.B group bone pain relieved markedly effective in 12 cases,effective in 4 cases,8 cases were ineffective,have efficiency 66.7%.A compared to the B,the curative effect was obvious (P <0.05).By enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of the patients with a,levels of peripheral serum MIP-1a and MIP-1 beta B two groups before and after treatment.Conclusions zole-dronic acid in the treatment of multiple myeloma bone disease effectively,can significantly improve the qual-ity of life in patients with MM patients serum MIP-1a and MIP-1 beta level and multiple myeloma tumor bone disease curative effect is negative correlation,used for evaluating the effect The reference index.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA