Patients' Acceptability and Satisfaction With Teleconsultation for Pelvic Floor Exercises for Stress Urinary Incontinence During COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: This was the first urogynaecology specialty nurse teleconsultation offered by a public hospital during COVID-19 for learning pelvic floor exercises. This study assessed patients' perception, acceptance, and satisfaction using 2 validated questionnaires. METHODS: In total, 25 patients with stress urinary incontinence attended the teleconsultation via videoconferencing in April 2022, and completed the Telemedicine Perception Questionnaire (TMPQ) and Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ). The TMPQ was a 17-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire for assessing the acceptability of telemedicine. The TSQ was a 14-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire for assessing satisfaction with teleconsultation. The higher the score, the greater the acceptance and satisfaction. Information on demographics, symptom severity by Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7, internet access, and transport arrangements were included. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 54.6 ± 7.37 years. Their mean Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 score was 40.60/100 (SD = 17.83) and Impact Questionnaire-7 was 27.90/100 (SD = 19.83). Pre-teleconsultation mean TMPQ score was 59.16 ± 5.78/85. Post-teleconsultation mean score was 64.92 ± 5.21/85, which was 3.64 higher (t = 3.642, df = 24, P = 0.001), indicating a significant increase in positive perception and acceptability. There were fewer concerns with the usage (P = 0.017) and reliability (P = 0.003) of technology, while there was increased agreement that teleconsultation is cost-saving for the health care system (P = 0.003) and offers easier access to health care providers (P = 0.006) after the teleconsultation. Mean TSQ score was 59.85 ± 9.46/70. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study demonstrated positive perception, high acceptability, and satisfaction from patients' first teleconsultation experience. Further multi-centre studies with the inclusion of a control group would help in understanding patients' needs and for service planning.

Telemedicine in urogynaecology during COVID-19 in Hong Kong: An assessment of Chinese patients' acceptability using a validated questionnaire.

AIMS: There is no urogynaecology teleconsultation services available in Hong Kong's public health system. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess Chinese womens' acceptance of teleconsultations during the COVID-19 pandemic using the validated Telemedicine Perception Questionnaire (TMPQ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one patients attending our urogynaecology clinic between February and March 2021 were recruited for an in-person interview. Patients who could not comprehend the questionnaire due to neurological or psychiatric conditions were excluded. TMPQ is a 17-item, five-point Likert scale questionnaire developed to assess the acceptability of telemedicine. Scores range from 17 to 85; a higher score reflects a more positive overall perception of telemedicine. Additional questions on demographics, medical history, Internet access and transport arrangements were included. RESULTS: Mean age was 67.5 ± 11.3 years. Mean TMPQ score was 53.93 ± 8.49. Younger age, higher education, employment, prior telecommunication platform usage, lower travelling costs and interest in telemedicine were associated with a higher TMPQ score (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis found age (ß = -0.132, 95% CI (confidence interval): -0.225 to -0.04), interest in telemedicine (ß = 10.169, 95% CI: 8.073-12.266) and post-operative status (ß = 4.743, 95% CI: 1.172-8.314) significantly predicted TMPQ score (adjusted R2  = 0.427). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the acceptability of telemedicine in Hong Kong was weak and identified patient groups that showed favourable attitudes. Future research directions would be to perform pilot studies to assess any change in perception after using telemedicine so that this service can be provided to patient groups who would benefit most, ensuring effective use of public resources.

Impact of suspending labour companionship during the COVID-19 pandemic on intrapartum care and delivery outcomes.

BACKGROUND: As part of infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, labour companionship was suspended intermittently at public hospitals across Hong Kong. AIMS: The aim was to assess the impact of restricting labour companionship on intrapartum care and maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing patients admitted for vaginal delivery with and without a labour companion. Deliveries during 1 February to 20 May and 17 July to 11 September 2020 ('alone group') were compared to deliveries during the same periods one year earlier when companionship was unrestricted ('accompanied group'). Outcomes were controlled for age, parity, body mass index, birth weight, education level and induction of labour. RESULTS: There were 651 and 491 deliveries in the accompanied and alone groups, respectively. Overall, physiological maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. Neonates in the alone group were more likely to have skin-to-skin contact delayed beyond 60 min after delivery (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.45-1.51). None of these infants were exclusively breastfed at the time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a labour companion may encourage earlier initiation of skin-to-skin contact, which has been shown to improve bonding experience. However, families that have already been affected by previous restrictions can be provided some reassurance that physiological outcomes do not appear to be significantly different. In addition, interventions that encourage companion involvement, such as breathing exercises and massages, were not hindered, as midwives took on a greater role in supporting the parturient.

Use of music in reducing pain during outpatient hysteroscopy: Prospective randomized trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of music in reducing pain during outpatient hysteroscopy under no anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial From June 2019 to December 2019 in Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital in Hong Kong. A total of 107 patients were randomized to music group (n = 54) or non-music group (n = 53). Music was played during outpatient hysteroscopy in the music group. Patients in the non-music group had the procedure done in the same setting without music. Primary outcome was the level of pain measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) score before and during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were vital parameters that reflect the level of pain including blood pressure and heart rate. RESULTS: Patients in the music group experienced significantly less pain during outpatient hysteroscopy (VAS score 4.54 ± 2.89 vs 5.88 ± 2.90; P = 0.02). The anticipated pain level was similar in both groups (VAS score 5.59 ± 2.27 vs 6.11 ± 2.43; P = 0.27). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in all the vital parameters. CONCLUSION: Listening to music during outpatient hysteroscopy under no anesthesia significantly reduces pain in a well-matched Chinese population. Music is easy to provide with low-cost equipment and manpower. We recommend the routine use of music during outpatient hysteroscopy to improve patient care.