RESUMEN
AIMS: Cardiovascular health is acknowledged as a crucial concern among cancer survivors. Socioeconomic status (SES) is an essential but often neglected risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted this study to identify the relationship between SES and CVD mortality in cancer survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Examinee database, we identified cancer survivors diagnosed and surviving beyond 5 years post-diagnosis. SES was assessed based on insurance premiums and classified into 5 groups. The primary outcome was overall CVD mortality. This study analyzed 170 555 individuals (mean age 60.7 ± 11.9 years, 57.8% female). A gradual increase in risk was observed across SES groups: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for overall CVD mortality were 1.15 (1.04-1.26), 1.28 (1.15-1.44), 1.31 (1.18-1.46), and 2.13 (1.30-3.49) for the second, third, and fourth quartile, and medical aid group (the lowest SES group) compared to the highest SES group, respectively (p for trend < 0.001). The lowest SES group with hypertension exhibited a 3.4-fold higher risk of CVD mortality compared to the highest SES group without hypertension. Interaction analyses revealed that low SES synergistically interacts with hypertension, heightening the risk of CVD mortality (synergy index 1.62). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant correlation between low SES and increased CVD mortality among cancer survivors. Particularly, the lowest SES group, when combined with hypertension, significantly escalates CVD mortality. Our findings underscore the critical importance of recognizing SES as a significant risk factor for CVD mortality in this population of cancer survivors.
Our population-based cohort study, involving over 170 000 cancer survivors, demonstrates a significant association between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
RESUMEN
Cardio-oncology is a critical field due to the escalating significance of cardiovascular toxicity as a side effect of anticancer treatments. Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a prevalent condition associated with cardiovascular toxicity, necessitating effective strategies for prediction, monitoring, management, and tracking. This comprehensive review examines the definition and risk stratification of CTRCD, explores monitoring approaches during anticancer therapy, and highlights specific cardiovascular toxicities linked to various cancer treatments. These include anthracyclines, HER2-targeted agents, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes therapies. Incorporating the Korean data, this review offers insights into the regional nuances in managing CTRCD. Using systematic follow-up incorporating cardiovascular imaging and biomarkers, a better understanding and management of CTRCD can be achieved, optimizing the cardiovascular health of both cancer patients and survivors.
RESUMEN
The prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) have become increasingly important. Recent studies have revealed the crucial role of genetics in determining the susceptibility to development of CTRCD. We present a case of a 65-year-old woman with breast cancer who developed recurrent CTRCD following low-dose chemotherapy, despite lacking conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Her medical history included anthracycline-associated cardiomyopathy, and her condition deteriorated significantly after treatment with HER2-targeted therapies. Through the use of multimodal imaging, we detected severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Further investigation with genetic testing revealed a likely pathogenic variant in the TNNT2 gene, suggesting a genetic predisposition to CTRCD. This case implies the potential role of genetic screening in identifying patients at risk for CTRCD and advocates for personalized chemotherapy and cardioprotective strategies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Cardiomiopatías , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Cardiomiopatías/inducido químicamente , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatías/genética , Ecocardiografía , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Troponina T/genéticaRESUMEN
A few studies have reported comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between balloon-expandable valve (BEV) and self-expandable valve (SEV) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis using newer-generation devices. However, those reports were mostly limited to short-term outcomes and Western populations. In the present study, data of patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR between March 2016 and December 2018 were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service in Korea. The primary end point, defined as all-cause mortality, was compared in BEV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) and SEV (Evolut R, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) groups using a propensity-score matching analysis. Cumulative event rates of ischemic stroke, repeat procedures, and permanent pacemaker insertion (PPI) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. All events were followed up to a maximum of 3 years. A total of 1,172 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR, of whom 707 (60.3%) were treated with BEV and 452 (38.6%) with SEV. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, the BEV group showed lower all-cause mortality after a median follow-up of 12.0 months (mean: 13.1 ± 9.3 months) based on Cox proportional hazard model analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.99, p = 0.04). Cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was not statistically different between the 2 groups (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.59, p = 0.37). PPI occurred less frequently in the BEV group (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.64, p < 0.01). Repeat procedures were rare (1 patient in BEV and 2 patients in SEV group). In conclusion, Korean nation-wide data analysis showed that BEV was associated with less all-cause death and incidence of PPI after TAVR than was SEV using a newer-generation device.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Incidencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Diseño de PrótesisRESUMEN
Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) has been shown to have a significant predictive value for cardiovascular disease. In some cases, it has a superior predictive value for future cardiovascular outcomes than daytime BP. As efficacy of BP medications wanes during nighttime and early morning, control of nocturnal hypertension and morning hypertension can be difficult. As such, chronotherapy, the dosing of BP medication in the evening, has been an ongoing topic of interest in the field of hypertension. Some studies have shown that chronotherapy is effective in reducing nocturnal BP, improving non dipping and rising patterns to dipping patterns, and improving cardiovascular prognosis. However, criticism and concerns have been raised regarding the design of these studies, such as the Hygia study, and the implausible clinical benefits in cardiovascular outcomes considering the degree of BP lowering from bedtime dosing. Studies have shown that there is no consistent evidence to suggest that routine administration of antihypertensive medications at bedtime can improve nocturnal BP and early morning BP control. However, in some cases of uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension and morning hypertension, such as in those with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea, bedtime dosing has shown efficacy in reducing evening and early morning BP. The recently published the Treatment in Morning versus Evening (TIME) study failed to demonstrate benefit of bedtime dosing in reducing cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension. With issues of the Hygia study and negative results from the TIME study, it is unclear at this time whether routine bedtime dosing is beneficial for reducing cardiovascular outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-NaF PET/CT) has been proven to be useful in identification of microcalcifications, which are stimulated by inflammation. Blood speckle imaging (BSI) is a new imaging technology used for tracking the flow of blood cells using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We evaluated the relationship between turbulent flow identified by BSI and inflammatory activity of the aortic valve (AV) as indicated by the 18F-NaF uptake index in moderate aortic stenosis (AS) patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 18 moderate AS patients diagnosed within the past 6 months. BSI within the aortic root was acquired using long-axis view TEE. The duration of laminar flow and the turbulent flow area ratio were calculated by BSI to demonstrate the degree of turbulence. The maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean) and the total microcalcification burden (TMB) as measured by 18F-NaF PET/CT were used to demonstrate the degree of inflammatory activity in the AV region. RESULTS: The mean SUVmean, SUVmax, and TMB were 1.90 ± 0.79, 2.60 ± 0.98, and 4.20 ± 2.18 mL, respectively. The mean laminar flow period and the turbulent area ratio were 116.1 ± 61.5 msec and 0.48 ± 0.32. The correlation between SUVmax and turbulent flow area ratio showed the most positive and statistically significant correlation, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient (R²) of 0.658 and a p-value of 0.014. CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of trans-aortic turbulence measured by BSI was correlated with severe AV inflammation.
RESUMEN
Background Hypertension is an important cause of morbidity, which predisposes patients to major cardiovascular events and mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the association between adherence to antihypertensive medication and clinical outcomes in adult patients with cancer. Methods and Results Using the 2002 to 2013 Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, we extracted adult patients with cancer treated with antihypertensive medications. Based on the medication possession ratio value, participants were divided into 3 groups: good (medication possession ratio ≥0.8), moderate (0.5≤ medication possession ratio <0.8), and poor (medication possession ratio <0.5) adherence groups. The primary outcomes were overall and cardiovascular mortality. The secondary outcome was cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization due to major cardiovascular diseases. Among 19 246 patients with cancer with concomitant hypertension, 66.4% were in the nonadherence group (26.3% were moderate and 40.0% were poor adherence group). Over a median of 8.4 years of follow-up, 2752 deaths and 6057 cardiovascular events occurred. Compared with the good adherence group, the moderate and poor adherence groups had a 1.85-fold and 2.19-fold increased risk for overall mortality, and 1.72-fold and 1.71-fold elevated risk for cardiovascular mortality, respectively, after adjustment for possible confounders. Furthermore, the moderate and poor adherence groups had a 1.33-fold and 1.34-fold elevated risk of new-onset cardiovascular events, respectively. These trends were consistent across cardiovascular event subtypes. Conclusions Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication was common in patients with cancer and was associated with worse clinical outcomes in adult patients with cancer with hypertension. More attention should be paid to improving adherence to antihypertensive medication among patients with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Few studies have reported comparisons of out-of-hospital clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in the era of current-generation valves that reflect the real-world situation. Data on patients with severe AS aged 65 years or older who underwent TAVR or SAVR between 2015 and 2018 were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service in Korea and clinical event rate was analyzed. The primary endpoint was all-cause death at 1 year. The cohort included a total of 4623 patients over 65 years of age, of whom 1269 (27.4%) were treated with TAVR. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 2120 patients were included in the study. TAVR was associated with reduced 1-year mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42−0.70; p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of ischemic stroke (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.43−1.20; p = 0.21) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 1.10; p = 0.74). Permanent pacemaker insertion was observed more frequently in the TAVR cohort (9.4% vs. 2.5%, HR: 3.95, 95% CI: 2.57−6.09; p < 0.001), whereas repeat procedures were rare in both treatments (0.5% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.499). In the nation-wide real-world data analysis, TAVR with current-generation devices showed significantly lower 1-year mortality compared to SAVR in severe AS patients.
RESUMEN
The relationship between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) and cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear. Our study assessed the prognostic implications of visit-to-visit BPV in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study enrolled 7,375 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI and at least five measurements of blood pressure after hospital discharge. Visit-to-visit BPV was estimated as variability independent of mean. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were major cardiovascular events (the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) and hospitalization for heart failure. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, adjusted risks of all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, and hospitalization for heart failure continuously increased as systolic BPV and diastolic BPV increased. Patients in the highest quartile of systolic BPV (versus lowest) had increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.85]), major cardiovascular events (aHR 1.31 [95% CI 1.1-1.55]), and hospitalization for heart failure (aHR 2.15 [95% CI 1.49-3.1]). Patients in the highest quartile of diastolic BPV was also associated with all-cause mortality (aHR 1.39 [95% CI 1.14-1.7]), major cardiovascular events (aHR 1.29 [95% CI 1.08-1.53]), and hospitalization for heart failure (aHR 2.01[95% CI 1.4-2.87]). Both systolic and diastolic BPV improved the predictive ability of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score for both all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events. Higher visit-to-visit BPV was associated with increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular events in patients after AMI.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no proven primary preventive strategy for doxorubicin-induced subclinical cardiotoxicity (DISC), especially among patients without a cardiovascular (CV) risk. We investigated the primary preventive effect on DISC of the concomitant use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or beta-blockers (BBs), especially among breast cancer patients without a CV risk. METHODS: A total of 385 patients who were scheduled for doxorubicin chemotherapy were screened. Among them, 195 patients of the study populations were included and were randomly divided into two groups [candesartan 4 mg q.d. vs. carvedilol 3.125 mg q.d.] and patients who were unwilling to take one of the medications were evaluated as controls. The primary outcomes were the incidence of early DISC (DISC developing within 6 months after chemotherapy), and late DISC (DISC developing only at least 12 months after chemotherapy). RESULT: Compared with the control group (8 out of 43 patients (18.6%)), only the candesartan group (4 out of 82 patients (4.9%)) showed a significantly lower incidence of early DISC (p = 0.022). Compared with the control group, the candesartan group demonstrated a significantly reduced decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) throughout the study period [-1.0% vs. -3.00 (p < 0.001) at the first follow-up, -1.10% vs. -3.40(p = 0.009) at the second follow-up]. CONCLUSIONS: Among breast cancer patients without a CV risk treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, subclinical cardiotoxicity is prevalent and concomitant administration of low-dose candesartan might be effective to prevent an early decrease in LVEF. Further large-scale, randomized controlled trials will be needed to confirm our findings.
Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiotoxicidad/prevención & control , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bifenilo/administración & dosificación , Cardiotoxicidad/epidemiología , Carvedilol/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of the clinical application of non-invasive transthoracic echocardiography for diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension induced by dasatinib (D-PAH) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: A total of 451 CML patients who were examined by 2D-echocardiography at least once at baseline and/or during dasatinib therapy as frontline (n = 196) and subsequent line (n = 255) therapies were included in this study. D-PAH was defined as right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) >40 mm Hg with relevant symptoms and the absence of other specific etiologies. RESULTS: A total of 847 echocardiographies were performed including at baseline (n = 255) and during dasatinib treatment (n = 592). During the median of 36.2 (0.1-181.8) months of dasatinib therapy, the level of RVSP gradually increased (Spearman's r = 0.2819, p < 0.001) and the mean RVSP was significantly increased after taking dasatinib therapy compared with baseline. During dasatinib therapy, 56 (12.4%) patients had RVSP >40 mm Hg without (asymptomatic, n = 27, 48.2%) or with symptoms (D-PAH, n = 29, 51.8%). All asymptomatic patients maintained dasatinib therapy without further symptoms and the D-PAH patients ultimately switched to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. After dasatinib discontinuation, 13 (45%) and 15 (52%) patients showed RVSP normalization and gradual decrease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our large cohort study demonstrated that the gradual increment of RVSP might be induced by dasatinib and non-invasive echocardiography can be fast way for early diagnosis as well as for monitoring of D-PAH.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Dasatinib/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/inducido químicamente , Función Ventricular Derecha/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Sístole/fisiología , Función Ventricular Derecha/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although the role of high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy in cardiovascular protection has broadened, concerns still exist about new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), especially in vulnerable patients. This study aimed to compare the effect of high-dose (4 mg/d) and usual dose (2 mg/d) pitavastatin on glucose metabolism in patients with hyperlipidemia and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). METHODS: In this 12-month study, glucose tolerance and lipid-lowering efficacy of high-dose pitavastatin (4 mg [study group]) was compared with that of usual dose pitavastatin (2 mg [control group]) in patients with hyperlipidemia and IFG. The primary end point was the change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) after 24 weeks of treatment. The secondary end points were as follows: (1) NODM within 1 year after treatment, (2) change of lipid parameters, (3) changes of adiponectin, and (4) change of blood glucose and insulin levels. FINDINGS: Of the total 417 patients screened, 313 patients with hypercholesterolemia and IFG were randomly assigned into groups. The mean (SD) change in HbA1c was 0.06% (0.20%) in the study group and 0.03% (0.22%) in the control group (P = 0.27). Within 1 year, 27 patients (12.3%) developed NODM, including 12 (10.6%) of 113 patients in the study group and 15 (14.2%) of 106 in the control group (P = 0.43). The study group had a significantly higher reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-C levels and a higher increase in apolipoprotein A1/apolipoprotein B ratio (0.68 [0.40] vs 0.51 [0.35], P < 0.01). IMPLICATIONS: The high-dose pitavastatin therapy did not aggravate glucose metabolism compared with the usual dose therapy. Moreover, it had a better effect on cholesterol-lowering and apolipoprotein distribution in the patients with hyperlipidemia and IFG.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Apolipoproteína A-I/sangre , Apolipoproteínas B/sangre , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Colesterol/sangre , Ayuno , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins are known to effectively reduce not only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level but also death and nonfatal myocardial infarction due to coronary heart disease. The risk for CVD from atherogenic dyslipidemia persists when elevated triglyceride (TG) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are not controlled with statin therapy. Therefore, statin/fenofibrate combination therapy is more effective in reducing CVD risk. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and a high risk for CVD. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, therapeutic-confirmatory clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combination therapy with pitavastatin/fenofibrate 2/160 mg in Korean patients with a high risk for CVD and a controlled LDL-C level (<100 mg/dL) and a TG level of 150-500 mg/dL after a run-in period with pitavastatin 2 mg alone. In the 8-week main study, 347 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive pitavastatin 2 mg with or without fenofibrate 160 mg after a run-in period. In the extension study, patients with controlled LDL-C and non-HDL-C (<130 mg/dL) levels were included after the completion of the main study. All participants in the extension study received the pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy for 16 weeks for the assessment of the tolerability of long-term treatment. FINDINGS: The difference in the mean percentage change in non-HDL-C from baseline to week 8 between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups was -12.45% (95% CI, -17.18 to -7.72), and the combination therapy was associated with a greater reduction in non-HDL-C. The changes in lipid profile, including apolipoproteins, fibrinogen, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein from baseline to weeks 4 and 8 were statistically significant with combination therapy compared to monotherapy at all time points. Furthermore, the rates of achievement of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B targets at week 8 in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups were 88.30% versus 77.98% (P = 0.0110) and 78.94% versus 68.45% (P = 0.0021), respectively. The combination therapy was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of statin monotherapy. IMPLICATIONS: In these Korean patients with mixed dyslipidemia and a high risk for CVD, combination therapy with pitavastatin/fenofibrate was associated with a greater reduction in non-HDL-C compared with that with pitavastatin monotherapy, and a significantly improvement in other lipid levels. Moreover, the combination therapy was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of statin monotherapy. Therefore, pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy could be effective and well tolerated in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03618797.
Asunto(s)
Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Fenofibrato/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Apolipoproteínas B/sangre , Colesterol/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Triglicéridos/sangreRESUMEN
Many novel anti-cancer therapies have dramatically improved outcomes of various cancer patients. However, it also poses a risk for cardiovascular complications as well. For the novel anti-cancer agent with which physicians does not have enough clinical experiences to determine the characteristics of cardiovascular complications, it is important to assess risk factors for cardiotoxicity before starting anti-cancer therapy. High-risk patient should be consulted to cardiologist before initiating anti-cancer therapy and pre-emptive cardiac function monitoring plan might be prepared in advance. The biomarkers, electrocardiography and echocardiography are useful tools for the detection of subclinical cardiotoxicity during anti-cancer therapy. This review article tried to suggest the cardiac function monitoring strategies for newly encountered potential cardiotoxic anti-cancer agents and to summarize the cardiovascular complications of novel anti-cancer immunotherapies including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. ICIs can cause fatal myocarditis, which usually occurs early after initiation, and prompt treatment with high-dose corticosteroid is necessary. CAR T-cell therapy can cause cytokine release syndrome, which may result in circulatory collapse. Supportive treatment as well as tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody are cornerstones of treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. However, the real-world CVD burden of adult cancer patients has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and mortality of pre-existing and new-onset CVD in patients with cancers. METHODS: We analysed the prevalence and mortality of pre-existing and new-onset CVD in 41,034 adult patients with ten common solid cancers in a single payer system using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort from 2002 to 2013. RESULTS: When all types of cancer were included, 11.3% (n = 4647) of patients had pre-existing CVD when they were diagnosed with cancer. After excluding patients with pre-existing CVD, 15.7% of cancer patients (n = 5703) were newly diagnosed with CVD during the follow-up period (median 68 months). Both pre-existing and new-onset CVD were associated with increased risk of overall mortality and 5-year mortality. Multivariate analysis to predict all-cause mortality indicated both pre-existing and new-onset CVD, male sex, old age, prior history of diabetes or chronic kidney disease, suburban residential area, and low-income status as significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven percent of cancer patients had pre-existing CVD at the time of cancer diagnosis, and about 16% of cancer patients without pre-existing CVD were newly diagnosed with CVD, mostly within 5 years after the cancer diagnosis. Proper management of pre-existing CVD is necessary and pre-emptive prevention of new-onset CVD may alter treatment options and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasias , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Head-to-head comparison of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of fimasartan versus valsartan, with olmesartan as a reference, on office blood pressure and ambulatory BP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 369 randomly assigned patients in this study, 365 hypertensive patients were referred as the full analysis set and divided into 3 groups with a 3:3:1 ratio (fimasartan group: 155, valsartan group: 157, olmesartan group: 53). After the 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, initial standard doses of 60-mg fimasartan, 80-mg valsartan, and 10-mg olmesartan were administered for 2 weeks, then forcibly up-titrated higher doses (fimasartan 120 mg, valsartan 160 mg, olmesartan 20 mg) were given for 4 weeks. ABP was measured before and after the 6-week treatment. Primary endpoint was reduction of sitting office systolic BP (SiSBP) of fimasartan compared to valsartan after 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were reduction of sitting office diastolic BP (SiDBP) and 24 hrs, day-time, and night-time mean systolic and diastolic ABP (ASBP, ADBP) after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 58.34±7.68 years, and 289 patients were male (79.18%). After the 6-week treatment, SiSBP reduction of fimasartan and valsartan were -16.26±15.07 and -12.81±13.87 (p=0.0298) and SiDBP were -7.63±9.67 and -5.14±8.52 (p=0.0211). Reductions in 24 hrs mean ASBP were -15.22±13.33 and -9.45±12.37 (p=0.0009), and ADBPs were -8.74±7.55 and -5.98±7.85 (p=0.0140). Reductions of night-time ASBPs were -16.80±15.81 and -10.32±14.88 (p=0.0012), and those of night-time ADBPs were -8.89±9.93 and -5.55±9.70 (p=0.0152). Reduction of BP in olmesartan group did not demonstrate significant difference with fimasartan group in all end-points. CONCLUSION: Fimasartan 120-mg treatment demonstrated superior efficacy in reduction of SiSBP, SiDBP, and 24 hrs ASBP and ADBP compared to valsartan 160 mg. Reduction of night-time ASBP from baseline was largest in fimasartan group, suggesting that fimasartan may be effective for recovering dipping pattern. NCT NUMBER: NCT02495324 (Fimasartan Achieving SBP Target (FAST) study).
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Compuestos de Bifenilo/farmacología , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Hipertensión Esencial/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/farmacología , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Tetrazoles/farmacología , Valsartán/farmacología , Adulto , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bifenilo/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , República de Corea , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Valsartán/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH) is a progressive and refractory vascular disease in the lung. Pulmonary hypertension is frequently combined with PCH when capillary proliferation invades to nearby pulmonary vascular systems. It is difficult to differentiate PCH from other diseases such as pulmonary venoocclusive disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension that cause pulmonary hypertension as they frequently overlap. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old female who had worked at a bathtub factory presented with progressive exertional dyspnea for the past 2 years. Computed tomography revealed centrilobular, diffusely spreading ground-glass opacities sparing subpleural parenchyma with some cystic lesions and air-trapping in both lungs, suggesting a peculiar pattern of interstitial lung disease with airway involvement. There was not any evidence of right heart failure or pulmonary hypertension on echocardiogram, as well as radiography. Microscopic examination of the lung by thoracoscopic resection showed atypical proliferation of capillary channels within alveolar walls and interlobar septa, without invasion of large vessels. CONCLUSION: We experienced a pathologically diagnosed PCH in a young female complaining progressive dyspnea with prior exposure to occupational silica or organic solvent without elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) who showed atypical pattern of radiologic findings.