Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e13784, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510667

RESUMEN

The differential diagnosis between lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) and lichen planus (LP) is difficult due to similar clinical and histological signs but important for treatment and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to propose the new diagnosis method for differentiate LDE from LP. During 2015-2018, 20 patients with confirmed LDE, 13 patients with LP and 134 controls were examined and treated at the Lenoblcenter. All enrolled patients were underwent the injection of 0.5 mL of the 2% lidocaine solution by insulin syringe into the papule with following histological examination. The formation of a blister (bulla) at the site of injection was considered a positive test result. Among LDE, 18 of 20 patients were found positive for developing blister (bulla) and two results were questionable. In 12 of 13 LP patents, bulla on the site of injection was not identified and the result of one patient was nonspecific. All control patients were negative for the proposed test. The histological sections showed that the bulla has corresponded to the separation of the epidermis from the dermis. Intracutaneous injection of 0.5 mL of lidocaine into the papule is an easy highly specific and sensitive method to differentiate LDE from LP.


Asunto(s)
Erupciones por Medicamentos , Liquen Plano , Erupciones Liquenoides , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Humanos , Liquen Plano/inducido químicamente , Liquen Plano/diagnóstico , Erupciones Liquenoides/inducido químicamente , Erupciones Liquenoides/diagnóstico
2.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 268: 97-112, 2020 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32141882

RESUMEN

Maintain Your Brain (MYB)i is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of multiple online interventions designed to target modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Traditional clinical trial management systems (CTMS) requirements consist of features such as management of the study, site, subject (participant), clinical outcomes, external and internal requests, education, data extraction and reporting, security, and privacy. In addition to fulfilling these traditional requirements, MYB has a specific set of features that needs to be fulfilled. These specific requirements include: (i) support for multiple interventions within a study, (ii) flexible interoperability options with third-party software providers, (iii) study participants being able to engage in online activities via web-based interfaces throughout the trial (from screening to follow-up), (iv) ability to algorithmically personalize trial activities based on the needs of the participant, and (v) the ability to handle large volumes of data over a long period. This paper outlines how the existing CTMSs fall short in meeting these specific requirements. The presented system architecture, development approach and lessons learned in the implementation of the MYB digital platform will inform researchers attempting to implement CTMSs for trials comparable to MYB in the future.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Mantenimiento , Investigación , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Int J Dermatol ; 56(4): 400-404, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28191631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Erythroderma is a serious medical condition characterized by inflamed red skin involving over 90% of the body. It can be the common presentation of different diseases, therefore clinical diagnosis can be problematic. Controversial data are reported regarding the diagnostic value of histological examination in erythroderma subjects. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, investigating histological skin specimens of patients with a clinical diagnosis of erythroderma admitted to the Department of Dermatology of State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, from 2001 to 2014. Histopathology examination was performed in each case by a pathologist with a special interest in the skin disease who was blind to any clinical information as well as to final diagnosis. RESULTS: Blinded histopathology examination alone was able to give the correct diagnosis in 61% (n = 50/82) of cases when compared to final diagnosis. A diagnosis of psoriasis was made in 23.2% (n = 19/82) of subjects, spongiotic dermatitis/eczema in 20.7% (n = 17/82), mycosis fungoides in 8.5% (n = 7/82), and drug eruption in 8.5%; histological diagnosis was inconclusive or not matching the final diagnosis when available in the remaining 39.1% of cases (n = 32/82). CONCLUSION: Erythroderma remains a condition difficult to study and treat. We showed that a correct judgment about its cause can be based on objective histopathological criteria in up to 60% of cases. More studies are needed to try to find out further histological and/or immunohistochemical markers that could help the clinician with the erythroderma etiology diagnostic process.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Exfoliativa/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Exfoliativa/patología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Eccema/diagnóstico , Micosis Fungoide/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Erupciones por Medicamentos/patología , Eccema/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micosis Fungoide/patología , Psoriasis/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA