The development of a current events and dialogue forum at a large U.S. academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: The Vanderbilt Community Circle (VC2) was designed to provide all faculty, staff, and students within the entire Vanderbilt University Medical Center community a dedicated venue to discuss current events and ongoing societal issues. APPROACH: During the 2017-18 academic year, four VC2 events were held on: "Race, identity, and conflict in America," "Gun violence in America," "Gender in the workplace," and "Immigration in America." Facilitators guided participants to share their views and perspectives on these matters with pre-developed open-ended questions. Attendees started discussions in small groups and then eventually combined into a large one. Pre- and post-event surveys were administered to measure the program's effectiveness. EVALUATION: One-hundred and twenty-four participants were included, 75 of whom completed both the pre- and post-event surveys. Sixty-four of the 75 (85%) agreed or strongly agreed that "multiple perspectives and opinions were represented" and 73% felt that their "own perspective was broadened on the issue." Most (89%) believed that the format and setting of the event was conducive to dialogue and discussion, and almost all (91%) reported that they would attend a similar event in the future. Groningen Reflection Ability Scale scores were high before (94 [25th-75th: 88-99]) and remained high after the events (93 [25th-75th: 88-93.3], p > 0.05). REFLECTION: We successfully implemented a medical center-wide, recurring current events and dialogue forum in hopes of increasing reflection, unity, and understanding across our own community.

Disparities and Inequities in Youth Sports.

ABSTRACT: Participation in youth sports can have a positive, lasting impact on a child's general health and physical well-being. Unfortunately, some youth populations are unable to participate and/or reap the benefits of sports because of existing inequities. Youth from lower socioeconomic status and ethnic minority children have been found to participate in sports less. These disparities are unfortunately pervasive and likely the result of multiple barriers, including financial and time constraints, limited resources and the inability to access facilities both in and out of school, and lack of familial support. There also exist inequities with regard to sports injury management, including knowledge, access to athletic trainers, and care. This article provides a review of the numerous disparities and inequities in youth sports. Compiling and understanding these data may help develop a framework to make youth sports more equitable and beneficial for all.

A Call for LGBTQ Content in Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements.

A well-developed body of literature demonstrates that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals experience poorer health outcomes and report worse health care experiences than straight/cisgender individuals. Many reforms since 2010 have addressed the LGBTQ-related education of future health care professionals at the undergraduate medical education (UME) level; however, reforms at the graduate medical education (GME) level are lagging, and new literature suggests that didactic education at the UME level is not enough to prepare future physicians to properly and compassionately care for LGBTQ patients. Recently, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented a major revision of its Common Program Requirements that requires residents to demonstrate, as a competence, respect and responsiveness to diverse populations. Given these revisions and the ongoing failure of many GME training programs to adequately prepare future physicians to care for LGBTQ patients, the authors argue that now is the time for the ACGME to develop and implement LGBTQ health-related residency requirements. In addition, the authors outline a path by which the academic medical community may develop and implement these requirements.

Evaluation of Racial Microaggressions Experienced During Medical School Training and the Effect on Medical Student Education and Burnout: A Validation Study.

INTRODUCTION: Microaggressions in the learning environment have been documented at various levels of medical training. However, there is lack of data detailing the prevalence and effects of racial microaggressions in medical school. This limits interventions that might improve the learning environment for underrepresented minority medical students (URMMS). This study describes the creation and validation of a survey instrument characterizing the experience of microaggressions in medical school and their impact on medical student education and burnout. METHODS: An anonymous survey instrument was adapted for medical students from the validated Racial and Ethnic Microaggressions Scale (REMS) and distributed to the national listservs of the Student National Medical Association (SNMA), Latino Medical Student Association (LMSA), and the Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association. Responses were categorized into two cohorts: under-represented minority (URM) and non-URM based on self-reported race or ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 217 responses were collected from medical students across the United States, with 148 (68.2%) students identifying as URM. URM respondents were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to report experiencing race-related microaggressions during medical school (55% vs 31%), and to report that these microaggressions contributed to feelings of burnout (62% vs 29%) and compromised learning (64% vs 49%). URM students were significantly less likely to feel that adequate resources were available to address microaggressions (26% vs 39%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that microaggressions experienced by URMMS can be evaluated using an adapted REMS. Additionally, the experience of microaggressions negatively impact the learning environment, and students feel the availability of sufficient resources to address microaggressions and their effects are lacking. Further research is needed to evaluate microaggressions and their impact on a larger scale. This should be followed by interventions to minimize the frequency and impact of these microaggressions.

Clinical Immersion and Biomedical Engineering Design Education: "Engineering Grand Rounds".

Grand Rounds is a ritual of medical education and inpatient care comprised of presenting the medical problems and treatment of a patient to an audience of physicians, residents, and medical students. Traditionally, the patient would be in attendance for the presentation and would answer questions. Grand Rounds has evolved considerably over the years with most sessions being didactic-rarely having a patient present (although, in some instances, an actor will portray the patient). Other members of the team, such as nurses, nurse practitioners, and biomedical engineers, are not traditionally involved in the formal teaching process. In this study we examine the rapid ideation in a clinical setting to forge a system of cross talk between engineers and physicians as a steady state at the praxis of ideation and implementation.