Effects of rivastigmine on cognitive function in dementia with lewy bodies: a randomised placebo-controlled international study using the cognitive drug research computerised assessment system.

This study was designed to assess the effects of rivastigmine (Exelon) on the cognitive functioning of patients suffering from dementia with Lewy bodies. This was a prospective, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study conducted at sites in the UK, Spain and Italy. The treatment period was 20 weeks with a 3-week posttreatment follow-up. The primary outcome measures were the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised assessment system and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Testing was conducted prior to dosing and then again at weeks 12, 20 and 23. Analysis of the data from the 92 patients who completed the study identified a significant pattern of benefits of rivastigmine over placebo on the CDR system. These benefits were seen on tests of attention, working memory and episodic secondary memory. Taking attention for example, patients given placebo showed a significant deterioration from predosing scores at 12 and 20 weeks, whereas patients on rivastigmine performed significantly above their predosing levels. These effects were also large in magnitude, the decline under placebo at week 12 being 19%, while the improvement under rivastigmine was 23%. The clinical relevance of this 23% improvement was that it took the patients 33% towards being normal for their age on this assessment of attention. These benefits to cognitive function were accompanied by a significant improvement of the other primary outcome measure, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Three weeks after discontinuation of rivastigmine, most parameters of cognitive performance returned to predrug levels.

Dementia with lewy bodies: findings from an international multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the baseline demographic, neuropsychiatric and neurological data of a large selected clinical sample of patients with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) from an international multicentre trial with rivastigmine. To examine the usefulness of the Consensus Criteria for the diagnosis of DLB in different countries. METHODS: Seventeen centres from Spain, the UK and Italy recruited patients diagnosed clinically as probable DLB according to recent Consensus Criteria (McKeith et al., 1996). A standard clinical protocol including inclusion/exclusion criteria, collection of demographic and medical data, cognitive (Mini Mental State Examination: MMSE), motor (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale: UPDRS) and neuropsychiatric (Neuropsychiatric Inventory: NPI) examinations, was applied after obtaining informed consent. Data were summarised and compared across countries with uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were recruited: 56.7% males, mean (SD) age 73.9 (6.4) years, range 57 - 87 years. Sixty percent fulfilled all three core diagnostic features of DLB, and 40% only two ('parkinsonism' 92.4%, 'cognitive fluctuations' 89.1%, 'visual hallucinations' 77.3%). 'Systematised delusions' (46%) and 'repeated falls' (42%) were the most frequent supportive diagnostic features. There were no differences across countries in demographic, diagnostic or clinical features. Patients showed a wide range of psychopathology which was weakly correlated with cognitive impairment. Some mild extrapyramidal signs (EPS) were observed in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Consensus Criteria for DLB can be consistently applied across many different sites for multicentre studies. 'Parkinsonism' and 'cognitive fluctuations' as core features and 'systematised delusions' and 'repeated falls' as supportive features are the most frequent diagnostic clues. Neuropsychiatric disturbances, in particular apathy, delusions, hallucinations and anxiety, and mild symmetric EPS are frequent in DLB and are only related weakly to cognitive impairment.

Efficacy of rivastigmine in dementia with Lewy bodies: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled international study.

BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies is a common form of dementia in the elderly, characterised clinically by fluctuating cognitive impairment, attention deficits, visual hallucinations, parkinsonism, and other neuropsychiatric features. Neuroleptic medication can provoke severe sensitivity reactions in patients with dementia of this type. Many deficits in cholinergic neurotransmission are seen in the brain of patients with Lewy-body dementia; therefore, drugs enhancing central cholinergic function represent a rationally-based therapeutic approach to this disorder. Rivastigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, was tested in a group of clinically characterised patients with Lewy-body dementia. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre study was done in 120 patients with Lewy-body dementia from the UK, Spain, and Italy. Individuals were given up to 12 mg rivastigmine daily or placebo for 20 weeks, followed by 3 weeks rest. Assessment by means of the neuropsychiatric inventory was made at baseline, and again at weeks 12, 20, and 23. A computerised cognitive assessment system and neuropsychological tests were also used, and patients underwent close medical and laboratory safety analysis. FINDINGS: Patients taking rivastigmine were significantly less apathetic and anxious, and had fewer delusions and hallucinations while on treatment than controls. Almost twice as many patients on rivastigmine (37, 63%), than on placebo (18, 30%), showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline. In the computerised cognitive assessment system and the neuropsychological tests, patients were significantly faster and better than those on placebo, particularly on tasks with a substantial attentional component. Both predefined primary efficacy measures differed significantly between rivastigmine and placebo. After drug discontinuation differences between rivastigmine and placebo tended to disappear. Known adverse events of cholinesterase inhibitors (nausea, vomiting, anorexia) were seen more frequently with rivastigmine than with placebo, but safety and tolerability of the drug in these mostly multimorbid patients were judged acceptable. INTERPRETATION: Rivastigmine 6-12 mg daily produces statistically and clinically significant behavioural effects in patients with Lewy-body dementia, and seems safe and well tolerated if titrated individually.

Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: international randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of rivastigmine on the core domains of Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, multicentre, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group trial. Patients received either placebo, 1-4 mg/day (lower dose) rivastigmine, or 6-12 mg/day (higher dose) rivastigmine. Doses were increased in one of two fixed dose ranges (1-4 mg/day or 6-12 mg/day) over the first 12 weeks with a subsequent assessment period of 14 weeks. SETTING: 45 centres in Europe and North America. PARTICIPANTS: 725 patients with mild to moderately severe probable Alzheimer's disease diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, and the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, rating on the clinician interview based impression of change incorporating caregiver information scale, and the progressive deterioration scale. RESULTS: At the end of the study cognitive function had deteriorated among those in the placebo group. Scores on the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale improved in patients in the higher dose group when compared with patients taking placebo (P<0.05). Significantly more patients in the higher dose group had improved by 4 points or more than had improved in the placebo group (24% (57/242) v 16% (39/238)). Global function as rated by the clinician interview scale had significantly improved among those in the higher dose group compared with those taking placebo (P<0.001), and significantly more patients in the higher dose group showed improvement than did in the placebo group (37% (80/219) v 20% (46/230)). Mean scores on the progressive deterioration scale improved from baseline in patients in the higher dose group but fell in the placebo group. Adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal, of mild to moderate severity, transient, and occurred mainly during escalation of the dose. 23% (55/242) of those in the higher dose group, 7% (18/242) of those in the lower dose group, and 7% (16/239) of those in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Rivastigmine is well tolerated and effective. It improves cognition, participation in activities of daily living, and global evaluation ratings in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. This is the first treatment to show compelling evidence of efficacy in a predominantly European population.

[Analysis of justifications for prescribing drugs which must be obtained abroad]. / Analiza opravdanosti propisivanja lijekova nabavljenih u inozemstvu.

Clinical Pharmacological Expertises issued between 1986 and 1990 by the Outpatient Clinic for Pharmacotherapy at the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Center, Zagreb were analysed. The expertises evaluated the rationale of pharmacotherapy for patients claiming the need to obtain the drug from abroad. Basis for this evaluation was the patients' medical documentation, or more rarely, physical examination of the patient. For the decision various sources were consulted. The aim of this analysis was to obtain yet another insight into the rationale of the pharmacotherapy in Croatia, and a partial overview of the quality and lack of approved drugs. Among 1293 analysed expertises, in only 46% of the patients the prescription of the drug was evaluated as rational. The administration of approved drugs was more often correct than the administration of nonapproved ones. The approved drugs whose prescription was always evaluated as unnecessary are listed, what could be of use for the renewal of the drug approval in Croatia. Among all the drugs, antineoplastic drugs were mostly appropriately prescribed, while the expertises concerning drugs for cardiovascular and nervous system were mostly negative. Expertises on certain drugs are more thoroughly discussed. Since we cannot claim that we had a representative sample of drug prescriptions; this analysis is not providing a real picture of the pharmacotherapy in Croatia, but the results may stimulate further, more systematic, evaluations.

Immunochemical identification of the alpha 1- and alpha 3-subunits of the GABAA-receptor in rat brain.

To identify subunit variants of the GABAA-receptor antisera were developed against specific cDNA-derived peptide sequences of the alpha 1- and alpha 3-subunits of rat brain. The alpha 1-subunit antiserum selectively recognized a protein of 50 +/- 1 kDa in rat and bovine GABAA-receptor preparations, while the alpha 3-subunit antiserum interacted with a protein doublet of 59 +/- 2 kDa and 61 +/- 3 kDa. The alpha 1-subunit immunoreactivity resides in a large population of GABAA-receptors as shown by immunoprecipitation of 63 +/- 6% of [3H]flumazenil binding sites with the alpha 1-subunit antiserum. In contrast, only 24 +/- 3% of receptor binding sites were precipitated with the alpha 3-subunit antiserum. Co-precipitation studies suggest that the alpha 1- and alpha 3-subunit immunoreactivities do not share the same receptor population while the gamma 2-subunit immunoreactivity is associated with the alpha 1-subunit immunoreactivity.